Originally posted by Doubting Thomas:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Faith alone:
Do you see where I''m going with this? And can you explain your thinking regarding why the believer's faith must be ongoing?
Thx,
FA
Faith must be ongoing because we stand (
present tense) by faith (see Romans 11:19-23). If we don't continue in the faith we'll be cut off from the vine.
So, yeah, faith-which-works-through-love (see Gal 5:6) is something we must
do. Sure, none of us can do it without God's enabling power and grace, but it is
we who still must be faithful. The Bible is full of exhortations to "stand firm", "hold fast", "abide", "keep", etc. While we need God's grace to have the power to do all these things, we're the ones that are commanded to
do all the "holding" and "standing" and "abiding". It's completely unbiblical to teach that we are completely passive in the salvation process. (In other words, while Pelagianism is obviously wrong, so is monergism.) </font>[/QUOTE]DT,
I'm not saying that we are completely passive in the sense that we merely believe something to be fact. We are relying on Christ's death in our behalf to save us. Hope that's clear.
Pelagianism merely is to say that sin has not so tainted our natures that we need not be enabled by God IOT respond to the gospel. I'm not saying that. The general Baptist view of free agency does not say that.
Monergism teaches that God alone saves, so I see that you have some balance here - good. I'm trying to do the same.
But Romans 11:19ff is speaking corporately of the nation of Israel and the church in Rome full of Gentile believers, which was mostly Gentile in nature. In general, the nation of Israel had been "broken off" from the vine. They had a position of favored stance. But this does not mean that some specific Jew had stopped believing and was cut off from Christ. Similarly, it does not mean that a Christian is secure as long as he continues to believe.
The moment, the very moment, that a person believes the gospel - trusts in Christ - he is a new creature. He is born from above, God does it. And once done, it cannot be undone.
BTW, the present tense merely indicates, when not in the indicative mood, that something is linear in type of action, it says absolutely nothing about the duration of the action. It merely points out that in the present, it was a linear kind of action (not "continuous" - different idea - that's the extremely rare habitual present).
But in Romans 11:20 "stands" is ESTHKAS - which is not present tense but perfect tense... "you have stood and remain standing by faith," or something like that. IOW, it speaks of something which happened at a point-in-time in the past (it is not linear), but which has a state continuing into the present... a state of having stood by faith. It doesn't say that we continue to believe or that if we stop believing that we no longer stand. (The Young's literal has "...thou hast stood by faith...") Most translations emphasized the present state rather than the past action.
Paul's point is that we are in a position of standing in our position in Christ based on a point-in-time kind of action in the past (when we trusted in Christ) and that the effects remain in the present. It speaks of the security we have in Christ. Paul was warning thse Gentiles not to get proud, because the church was becoming mainly Gentile in nature, but that was based ONLY on their faith. If the Jews, as a nation - enmass - turned in faith to Christ, they would be grafted in.
Thx,
FA