Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
New Covenant theology?He is saying we only have to keep 2 laws and in their keeping the law is kept.
Again, if Andy Stanley denied the Christ’s resurrection, you’d race to defend him.No. The point is that he has not denied anything.
He hasn't. His ministry audience has changed. He is mainly evangelizing post modern indoctrinated college students and recent graduates. He is still very fundamental in his beliefs. He has changed his mode to a baby steps approach. His approach is that you do not hAve to believe in Genesis creation to be saved. You don't have to believe the flood to be saved. You don't have to believe the Old Testament to be saved. Once you are saved, as you mature, you will grow to a point you believe all them. He is targeting an audience that believes there is no truth much less absolute truth. His approach is very effective but easily misunderstood.
Why 'The Bible Says So' Is Not Enough AnymoreEasy believism. He did say that when science contradicts Scripture, then you set Scripture aside and thus he believes in Big Bang, which does contradict Scripture. His video has been reviewed in detail by expert theologians.
He believes the Bible is infallible(w/o error) in everything it affirms. That’s a rather ambiguous statement. Because he said the creation myth in Genesis.Why 'The Bible Says So' Is Not Enough Anymore
What you say Stanley believes is not what he believes.
He believes the literal creation in Genesis. It would be nice if you knew what he said instead of snippets.He believes the Bible is infallible(w/o error) in everything it affirms. That’s a rather ambiguous statement. Because he said the creation myth in Genesis.
Again, if he openly denied the resurrection of the Christ, you would defend the man.
He believes the literal creation in Genesis. It would be nice if you knew what he said instead of snippets.
Why 'The Bible Says So' Is Not Enough Anymore
What you say Stanley believes is not what he believes.
And it seems as if other saw Stanley blowing his nose they’d charge him with heresy..Again, if Andy Stanley denied the Christ’s resurrection, you’d race to defend him.
He does nothing wrong in your eyes.
And it seems as if other saw Stanley blowing his nose they’d charge him with heresy..
I think their is a large middle ground.
I haven’t listened to many sermons by Andy Stanley but I’ve heard a few.
They are well crafted. Listening to a sound bite just doesn’t get his pint across.
I’m very willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, particularly observing his successful ministry, evangelism and discipleship.
On the other hand I’m quite wary of Ken Ham and his organization.
He is pointedly aggressive and antagonistic toward those who disagree with his particular brand of young earth creationism.
Rob
I’ve listened to 4-5 of his speeches and he spends more time deconstructing the Bible than expounding upon it.
Stanley believes in the flood.Unfortunately, that statement says very little. Times have not changed except we are getting near the end. To say that you believe Scripture but then preach whatever you please is what is going on. For the record, Geisler also rejects young earth and calls Ham a presuppositionalist. He is joined in that viewpoint by Dr. Land.
If you say that Jesus is Lord but you don't believe in the flood, then how do you dismiss the fact that Jesus said there was a flood? Matthew 24:38-39 and Luke 17:27.