Forget the KJB. Is there any version that you believe is perfect?

[Van]

Says a man who doesn't believe his "go to" Bible is inspired, to a man who does.

Yet another you, you, you post from the false teacher who denies 1 Timothy 3:16.

 

[George Antonios]

2) Our bibles contain errors introduced by copiers and translators.

The question, brother, is, is there a version today that I could buy, that doesn't contain any such error? Yes, or no? Will you answer clearly as some others have?

 

[Reformed1689]

The question, brother, is, is there a version today that I could buy, that doesn't contain any such error? Yes, or no? Will you answer clearly as some others have?

Do you know about the copy/printing errors of your "perfect" KJV?

 

[George Antonios]

Yet another you, you, you post from the false teacher who denies 1 Timothy 3:16.

The thread is about answering a question. You're the one on my personal case.

 

[George Antonios]

Do you know about the copy/printing errors of your "perfect" KJV?

Thanks for yet again proving the OP. You won't leave the KJB alone because you know you lose face once you do.
This thread is not about the KJB. No matter how hard you try to make it so.

 

[Van]

The thread is about answering a question. You're the one on my personal case.

False teachers always charge those pointing to truth with whatever malfeasance the false teacher has engaged in. You could set your watch by it.

 

[Logos1560]

The thread is about what Bible version could I buy that is 100% given by inspiration.

Perhaps this thread is showing how you may choose to deceive yourself by believing something that is true, how you try to mislead and deceive others, and how you try to accuse others falsely. You have exposed your own erroneous, non-scriptural, human reasoning.

The Scriptures do not state nor teach that any Bible translation [made after the completion of the giving of the New Testament by inspiration] is given by process of inspiration of God.

 

[George Antonios]

False teachers always charge those pointing to truth with whatever malfeasance the false teacher has engaged in. You could set your watch by it.

Right. So you gonna answer the question or not?

 

[Reformed1689]

Thanks for yet again proving the OP. You won't leave the KJB alone because you know you lose face once you do.
This thread is not about the KJB. No matter how hard you try to make it so.

No George that is not the case. The KJV IS a BIBLE YOU CAN PURCHASE TODAY. You have claimed that it is perfect without proof. The KJV is not perfect. It's not. The translators said so. History has proven so. Yet, you are trying to make the Bibles we use today to hold up to a standard that doesn't exist.

 

[George Antonios]

The Scriptures do not state nor teach that any Bible translation [made after the completion of the giving of the New Testament by inspiration] is given by process of inspiration of God.

Woohoo! Finally, the man mans-up to answer relatively clearly. Good job @Logos1560

 

[Reformed1689]

So George, you say you dealt with the KJV Translator issue of them saying they were not inspired or infallible by quoting this verse. How does this support your case?

@George Antonios you ignored this.

 

[Reformed1689]

Woohoo! Finally, the man mans-up to answer relatively clearly. Good job @Logos1560

Like all of us have.

 

[George Antonios]

@George Antonios you ignored this.

Once more, you prove the OP's claim. Once more, thank you.

It's amazing this obsession with the KJB on your part, a phenomenon to watch.

 

[George Antonios]

Like all of us have.

You did, and a few others that I listed, not all, no. And even then it took labour.

 

[Reformed1689]

Once more, you prove the OP's claim. Once more, thank you.

It's amazing this obsession with the KJB on your part, a phenomenon to watch.

It's not an obsession with the KJV. It's trying to understand your position but you won't explain you deflect, mock, lie, and who knows what else.

 

[Reformed1689]

You did, and a few others that I listed, not all, no. And even then it took labour.

It takes labor because you move the goalposts and don't understand basic terms.

 

[George Antonios]

It's not an obsession with the KJV. It's trying to understand your position but you won't explain you deflect, mock, lie, and who knows what else.

The thread is not about the KJB yet you keep going back to the KJB. You're deflecting, exactly as stated in the OP.

 

[George Antonios]

It takes labor because you move the goalposts and don't understand basic terms.

No, because every time someone answered clearly, I acknowledged it, like I acknowledged your answer. You know that.

 

[Van]

Right. So you gonna answer the question or not?

Yet another you, you, you post to avoid these facts:
1) Our bibles are trustworthy and reliable, and this includes the KJV, the NKJV, the NASB, and many others.
2) Our bibles contain errors introduced by copiers and translators.

The conclusion is even though some corruptions exist, our bibles are still profitable for instruction, reproof, correction and training in righteousness. They can lead the lost to Christ. (2 Timothy 3:15-16),

 

[Reformed1689]

The thread is not about the KJB yet you keep going back to the KJB. You're deflecting, exactly as stated in the OP.

I'm trying to understand your position. You are the one deflecting George. You have been dishonest this entire thread about what people have said, what people believe, and what people have done. That is bearing false witness against your neighbors. You have been in active sin this entire thread. You owe all of us an apology and need to repent for your sin.