Forget the KJB. Is there any version that you believe is perfect?

[George Antonios]

No need, your false claims are obvious.

Right.

 

[George Antonios]

Pay no attention to this non-stop false teacher, I answered the question and he even acknowledged that I did.

Show us where, Van.
The question wasn't about your "go to" and "reliable" Bible. You know it.

 

[George Antonios]

I did not disparage you until you disparaged me. I am trying to teach you to follow Christ, and not your fleshly desires.

You don't believe any version that I could buy today is given by inspiration. Correct? Yes or No?

 

[Logos1560]

you read it that way because you hastened to judge me.

You hastened to misjudge and condemn believers based on your own straw man misrepresentation of what they believe.

 

[George Antonios]

You hastened to misjudge and condemn believers based on your own straw man misrepresentation of what they believe.

Still avoiding to answer the question I see.

 

[Logos1560]

I believe the King James Bible is given by inspiration.

Because you choose to believe something does not make it true and scriptural.

You could choose to deceive yourself and believe something that is not true and that is not stated in the Scriptures.

 

[Logos1560]

Still avoiding to answer the question I see.

It is sound and proper not to answer an invalid question that assumes an unproven premise.

Your question has in effect been soundly answered by pointing out that it is invalid and by pointing out the erroneous reasoning behind it.

 

[George Antonios]

Because you choose to believe something does not make it true and scriptural.

You could choose to deceive yourself and believe something that is not true and that is not stated in the Scriptures.

Beside the point of the thread. The question, can I buy a version today that is 100% given by inspiration.
I didn't ask anyone to defend their choice, just to answer.
You gonna answer? I did.

 

[George Antonios]

It is sound and proper not to answer an invalid question that assumes an unproven premise.

Your question has in effect been soundly answered by pointing out that it is invalid and by pointing out the erroneous reasoning behind it.

Yep, still won't answer.

 

[Van]

Show us where, Van.
The question wasn't about your "go to" and "reliable" Bible. You know it.

No need to show you anything as you deny truth.

 

[Reformed1689]

Neither did Paul sometimes!

2Co 7:8 For though I made you sorry with a letter, I do not repent, though I did repent: for I perceive that the same epistle hath made you sorry, though it were but for a season.

So George, you say you dealt with the KJV Translator issue of them saying they were not inspired or infallible by quoting this verse. How does this support your case?

 

[George Antonios]

No need to show you anything as you deny truth.

Won't answer, to the bitter end. Victimhood, of course, is naught but the throes of death in this case.

 

[George Antonios]

So George, you say you dealt with the KJV Translator issue of them saying they were not inspired or infallible by quoting this verse. How does this support your case?

Open the thread.

 

[Reformed1689]

You don't believe any version that I could buy today is given by inspiration. Correct? Yes or No?

It depends what you mean by that. If you mean the the English words on the page were given by inspiration then no. If you mean the message contained within, then yes.

 

[Reformed1689]

Open the thread.

It's open here and is important to the current topic. Stop deflecting.

 

[Logos1560]

Beside the point of the thread. .

It is not beside the point of the thread to expose the erroneous reasoning in your so-called point.

Your so-called point is wrong. You show that you cannot defend your point as being true and scriptural.

You choose to believe something that you do not prove to be true and scriptural, suggesting that you may be deceiving yourself.

 

[George Antonios]

you deny truth

Says a man who doesn't believe his "go to" Bible is inspired, to a man who does.

 

[George Antonios]

It is not beside the point of the thread to expose the erroneous reasoning in your so-called point.

Your so-called point is wrong.

You choose to believe something that you do not prove to be true and scriptural, suggesting that you may be deceiving yourself.

The thread is about what Bible version could I buy that is 100% given by inspiration.
You don't like that? Open a thread.

 

[Van]

You don't believe any version that I could buy today is given by inspiration. Correct? Yes or No?

Yet another you, you, you post to avoid these facts:
1) Our bibles are trustworthy and reliable, and this includes the KJV, the NKJV, the NASB, and many others.
2) Our bibles contain errors introduced by copiers and translators.

The conclusion is even though some corruptions exist, our bibles are still profitable for instruction, reproof, correction and training in righteousness. They can lead the lost to Christ.

 

[Reformed1689]

The thread is about what Bible version could I buy that is 100% given by inspiration.

If you are looking for a Bible where the English Words are inspired, you will not find one. Does not exist. If you are looking for a Bible where the MESSAGE of the words contained within are inspired then you can look to any number of translations which include, but are not limited to, the KJV, NASB, ESV, CSB, and more.