• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Forget the KJB. Is there any version that you believe is perfect?

Status
Not open for further replies.

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
How dare you change the subject to me, you phony false teacher. The KJV is not perfect, it is riddled with errors.
Since the LXX differs from the KJV, which you claim is perfect, then the LXX contained errors.

How dishonest. The OP said this is not about the KJB. This thread is not about the KJB. Stop trying.
You keep proving the assertion in the OP.
You guys always deflect to the KJB to hide the fact that you believe no Bible period.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
How dishonest. The OP said this is not about the KJB. This thread is not about the KJB. Stop trying.
You keep proving the assertion in the OP.
You guys always deflect to the KJB to hide the fact that you believe no Bible period.
So which Bible is "perfect" George? That's your claim isn't it? That there is a Bible today that is 100% pure? Otherwise we don't believe the Word of God?
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
How dare you change the subject to me, you phony false teacher. The KJV is not perfect, it is riddled with errors.
Since the LXX differs from the KJV, which you claim is perfect, then the LXX contained errors.

Christ and the apostles never quoted an LXX ( a post-NT work) a day in their life. But a topic for another thread.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
by definition a negation of an 100% inspired Bible = not believing the word of God.

I believe the King James Bible is given by inspiration.
No, again, you misrepresent. Here are some problems.

1. I never said I didn't believe the Bible was 100% inspired. It was.
2. The KJV translators TOLD YOU they were not inspired, nor infallible. So you are insane if you claim that they were. They were not.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
2. The KJV translators TOLD YOU they were not inspired, nor infallible. So you are insane if you claim that they were. They were not.

Again, was already addressed in the thread.

1. I never said I didn't believe the Bible was 100% inspired. It was.

You're playing semantical games. You already answered the OP, remember?

No translation is given by 100% inspiration

And that's what the OP question was about. Not "was" but "is".
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Says the man who still hasn't answered the OP and pretended it was about what is your go to version that you think is reliable.
Pay no attention to this non-stop false teacher, I answered the question and he even acknowledged that I did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top