How can there be four fingers pointing back? I only count three (unless I am doing a double point, then I count six).
I just assumed you were shaking your fist...:laugh: :wavey:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How can there be four fingers pointing back? I only count three (unless I am doing a double point, then I count six).
I just assumed you were shaking your fist...:laugh: :wavey:
Someone appealed to mystery as an explanation for the fact that divine sovereignty and human free will coincide. Michael said that it was like Jesus being fully man and fully God.
This is a debate forum. Everyone on the board has the right to put forth their arguments. The forum (or even the thread) does not belong to you. Why are you so arrogant? Is it intimidating to answer his question?Because you are not the debate nazi around here. This is not an inquisition- it is a debate. I don't just answer questions.
I make arguments and answer arguments.
This is a debate forum. Everyone on the board has the right to put forth their arguments. The forum (or even the thread) does not belong to you. Why are you so arrogant? Is it intimidating to answer his question?
I make the arguments and I answer the arguments.
Yes your Lordship!
Do you expect all the BB to bow down before you?
We have the choice to serve one of two masters, God or Satan.
If we choose ourselves at any point, it is choosing Satan.
If we deny ourselves at every point to follow Him, He will provide.
Jesus shed His godly authority to become man, to walk as one of us, yet without sin.
Jesus was fully man, in perfect relationship with the Father.:thumbs:
It doesn't change the meaning any does it:Your intentional adding of the article "the" to twist my words to suit your relentless hateful onslaught against me is duly noted.
Hope your proud
Yep- we have choice. Every Calvinist on earth agrees with this.
We keep having to say the same things over and over again.
We have choice but without the Holy Ghost we choose evil every time.
The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God neither can he...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHK
This is a debate forum. Everyone on the board has the right to put forth their arguments. The forum (or even the thread) does not belong to you. Why are you so arrogant? Is it intimidating to answer his question?
I make the arguments and I answer the arguments.
Yes your Lordship!
Do you expect all the BB to bow down before you?
Your intentional adding of the article "the" to twist my words to suit your relentless hateful onslaught against me is duly noted.
Hope your proud
It doesn't change the meaning any does it:
"I make arguments and answer arguments."
We all know what you mean, especially in the light of having just personally insulted Webdog by saying to him:
"Because you are not the debate nazi around here. This is not an inquisition- it is a debate."
And then you arrogantly say:
I don't just answer questions.
Well, what do you do???
I make arguments and answer arguments.
You don't get the respect of the people here that way.
I was saying I don't answer frivolous questions. What I do, rather is answer arguments put to me and make arguments and put them to others.
That is what I was saying- I think it is simple for any thinking person to see that.
What you did because you are frustrated by so many young people smashing you in so many debates in spite of your elderly state is twist my words to fuel your hatefulness toward me.
Adding the two articles TOTALLY changed the tone of my words and took them COMPLETELY out of context.
If you did this on purpose, you have a anger problem. You need to deal with it. If not, then just apologize to me and everybody else on here and we can move on.
BTW, calling me arrogant is a personal attack and against the rules. I think if you are going to continue to pick fights with me you ought to resign your station as a moderator- it is not very upstanding behavior and beneath what we should expect of one who occupies this position.
We all should expect more of someone who is so advanced in years.
Luke are you serious? You are the one who seems frustrated because you are getting smashed in debates. You are the one who picks fights with anyone who disagrees with you. You are the one who whines when someone resorts to name calling or even insinuates your lack of intelligence. (You seem to take the attitude that you are the only one who is justified to call names and be arrogant)
Now you call for the BB to be run the way that you demand? Surely the main reason you come here is just stirr up whatever you can. If you are indeed a pastor, I really wonder if you act this way to your congregation? If you do ----------- never mind you don't. There can not be that many people in one place who are lacking enough mentally to put up with the actions you have displayed on this board.
I kinda thought at first you were over enthusiastic but I am starting to see that you are a little kid just trying to bully those who will not be bullied and this frustrates you.
Get over your anger or all you will continue to be is a Legend in your own mind.
I am praying for you and will continue to pray for you even if I end up putting you on ignore for a while.
If you think someone offended you, forgive them. If you think they continually offend you, turn your cheek, and forgive them all the more. Give grace. Jesus was never offended in anything they did to Him, He said forgive them Father, they don't know what they are doing. The Christ in you is bigger than any offense, if you can deny yourself.:godisgood:
...and you claim you are not arrogant.I think the Arminian has a lower view of God.
I never claimed to be the debate nazi, but you sure try to play the role, don't you?Because you are not the debate nazi around here. This is not an inquisition- it is a debate. I don't just answer questions.
I make arguments and answer arguments.
1- Luke needs to chill and not be so defensive and aggressive. He has good points but he comes off bad some times and taints his good arguments with the way he makes them.
2- DHK and John Toppass have a personal problem with luke. It is obvious he sets them off and they lack the restraint to behave appropriately when engaging him. John pursues Luke over a few different threads and has said some pretty rotten things about him. DHK has done so lately as well.
3- Luke is not dumb. He is probably not at ALL intimidated by the intellect of DHK and John Toppass. Whether I agree with his position or not he is certainly making the better arguments.
4- As a moderator, DHK needs to be less personal in his assaults. Better is expected of him because of the position he holds.
You forgot to talk in the third person :laugh::laugh: :laugh:
Tell me you really don't want my HONEST opinion on this, Luke. Cause ^^that^^ ain't it.
:laugh: