DrJamesAch
New Member
If the will is always bound by nature, and even Christians were by nature children of wrath, then nobody would ever be saved because the believer would have always been bound to his sinful nature.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have been on your side--your not seeing what im saying because you are putting it in the mold of what others teach about free will--I am not doing so.
your mindset is already set in stone and you cant see but 1 meaning of free will and truly that is the wrong meaning --but that's not the meaning I am bringing forth friend--if what you say is correct--then man is not responsible for his actions because he is bound and can do nothing--but the fact of the matter is man chooses with his will to do evil because he is evil--that is using his free will to choose--and he will choose evil everytime--my friend it is man's fault and not God's for man's condition--man has the ability to choose but he chooses evil--therefore God has to intervene on man's account or he will NEVER be saved in this life. I think its clear as mud myself--sorry you cant see it yet.:love2::love2:
If the will is always bound by nature, and even Christians were by nature children of wrath, then nobody would ever be saved because the believer would have always been bound to his sinful nature.
If the will is always bound by nature, and even Christians were by nature children of wrath, then nobody would ever be saved because the believer would have always been bound to his sinful nature.
You seem to miss one very important aspect.
Man chooses to do evil not because he has "free" will, but because his will is bound to choose evil.
For instance, when the Scriptures state that evil folks know how to give good gifts, it is not saying that the evil people have the capacity to choose what is righteous. It is merely stating that humankind know right from wrong and that they can discern right giving from wrong giving. The same as one can choose healthy or unhealthy, what is wrong with a car or right with a car, what is appropriate and what is inappropriate, what is modest and immodest... On a side, all that the natural man chooses will eventually decay and be worthless - which speaks clearly that the natural man receives nothing of the Spirit of God (in particular the fruit of the Spirit).
However, the point being made by you is valid, in that one cannot nor do they have the "free will" / "free choice" ability to seek salvation. It must be under the direct and purposed work of God in a person that brings that person to Christ. That is rudimentary to election.
also what you teach is--man is bound to do evil...his will is not bound--he chooses evil because he is evil and that is what he loves--hes using his free will to choose that that he loves and will do so everytime he is givin the choice to do so.
im sorry but if he is bound to choose evil then it is not his choice at all he has no say so in the matter--and will have an excuse before God to offer up
Truth is he does have a say so just like adam did--and he chooses according to his will to do evil not because hes bound to do so--but because he loves Sin and pleasure of the flesh more than God--PERIOD--
and the only thing to break him free of his own free choosing is the Grace of God--making him willing and causing him to love God instead of evil
sorry friend I can no longer give man an excuse that he might present before God--But I will make man totally responsible for his own actions by his free will choosing.:love2::love2:
his will is not bound--he chooses evil because he is evil and that is what he loves--hes using his free will to choose that that he loves and will do so everytime he is givin the choice to do so.
im sorry but if he is bound to choose evil then it is not his choice at all he has no say so in the matter--and will have an excuse before God to offer up
Truth is he does have a say so just like adam did--and he chooses according to his will to do evil not because hes bound to do so--but because he loves Sin and pleasure of the flesh more than God--PERIOD--
and the only thing to break him free of his own free choosing is the Grace of God--making him willing and causing him to love God instead of evil
sorry friend I can no longer give man an excuse that he might present before God--But I will make man totally responsible for his own actions by his free will choosing.:love2::love2:
also what you teach is--man is bound to do evil...
what that is really saying is man cant choose God nor can he choose evil--because he is bound to do evil and he has no choice at all--my friends that is kinda like man is a robot and doesn't have a choice at all to do anything he just does evil because hes programmed to do so--utter foolishness!!!
Yes! I have heard that many times and I swallowed it because I was new to Bible study and assumed these people knew more than me. I even heard a man at my church say that recently.For decades the typical SBC was feed by preachers who were schooled by those who taught that inside each humankind is a God like void. That the person seeks to fill that void with the world, until such a time as they see the real void filler is God.
There are many variations on that theme, but it all comes down to basically a heretical doctrine that man has the innate ability and is capable of willing to choose to be saved, irregardless of the call of God through the work of the Holy Spirit.
Be careful what you call "utter foolishness."
You are not arguing against me in this matter, but the apostle Paul:
2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death.
3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
4 that the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
5 For they that are after the flesh mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
6 For the mind of the flesh is death; but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace:
7 because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can it be:
8 and they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
9 But ye are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
10 And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the spirit is life because of righteousness.
11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall give life also to your mortal bodies through his Spirit that dwells in you.
--where is it taught in scripture that man's will has been bound to evil ?
yes those scriptures are true friend--describing man as totally evil--no where does that scripture say of man being bound--but saying man is totally evil and corrupt in his ways--because man loves sin and evil and chooses with his will do go in that direction and will do so unless God intervenes.Man is bound in all his being and enslaved to sin, including his will -- see John 8:30ff.
When we are described as under this indictment 'the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint, from the sole of the foot even to the head there is no soundness in it but bruises and sores and raw wounds, they are not pressed out or bound up or softened with oil.' Isaih 1:5-6
This was not written of the physical body, but of the whole spirit and being of lost man. Yet now we have one (and others) coming along and saying we aren't altogether in such a state.
There is where the fallacy comes from -- disagreeing with Gods testimony concerning the state of lost man.
If the will is always bound by nature, and even Christians were by nature children of wrath, then nobody would ever be saved because the believer would have always been bound to his sinful nature.
The nature of God is now tarnished imho.
yes those scriptures are true friend--describing man as totally evil--no where does that scripture say of man being bound--but saying man is totally evil and corrupt in his ways--because man loves sin and evil and chooses with his will do go in that direction and will do so unless God intervenes.
And thus you have it. God in a box and He must succomb to your desires, and fit your mold, or He is not God.
Leave your ad hominems at the door. Saying God is tarnished by the Idea that God only loves some, does not make any mold, it is what scripture reveals to me and many scholars. So unless you have a proper response... 2 words... puh lease.
:applause::thumbsup:
I like this, from here the response was "Gods Grace changes that" paraphrasing obviously
The question then is why doesn't God move His 'Irresistable Grace' On all? Does God love everyone or some people? If you are to say that God loves only those whom He has predestined to love. The nature of God is now tarnished imho.
Not at all. You've been found out, it's up to you to face it or not. I couldn't care less about your hypothetical scholars who remain unquoted. Nothing in what I said was ad hominen, it was merely a reflection of what you've done with the Godhead. If He happens to be other than what you make Him out to be or desire Him to be, to you He is tarnished.
In fact, what you said is actually the ad hominem, and projected at God if not fitting into your box.