• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Generational Failure

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Your not referencing Karma (what goes around comes around) methodology are you? Frankly its not Christian & little more than a scare tactic. He is a young man yet so I would have preferred direct dialogs to correct him, even if you have to take him to the wood shed.... not veiled threats. What are you thinking?!? PM the guy or something if you think he needs straighting out.
If you read my post carefully, you will find nothing whatever resembling karma.
 

Zenas

Active Member
If you were an adult in the early sixties to late seventies, you should know that your generation LOST this nation.

The way you did church FAILED.

. . . .

Stop. Let it die. It needs to. Pass the torch that you have let dwindle to a faint flicker before it goes out altogether.

Thanks.
Luke, I'm glad you got that off your chest. :rolleyes:
 

Gregory Perry Sr.

Active Member
I Will....!

I believe we are right on target in our generation as far as God is concerned according to His purposes in His "plan for the ages".

We may well be and maybe Luke's generational church is the beginning of;

Rev. 3:14-22

I won't copy and paste.

Percho...I WILL copy and paste that....it is worth putting here for ALL to see!
Rev. 3:14-22 -
14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;
15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.
21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
22 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

Percho...Thanks for sharing your thoughts and that important passage of scripture. Time is getting short...we need to humble ourselves and get busy about our Master's work.

Bro.Greg:saint:
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ah, the true face of PELAGIANISM! :laugh:
Don't pretend for one second that you know a thing about "Pelagianism"...or what is was..or what Pelagius himself believed...you don't..

And almost NO ONE on this board is even "Pelagian" anyway...

You mock yourself. :laugh:
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If you were an adult in the early sixties to late seventies, you should know that your generation LOST this nation.

The way you did church FAILED.

Now that does not apply to EVERY SINGLE church and Christian of that generation, but it does apply to the generation by and large.

It's time for you to take responsibility and to pass the torch and let the younger generation get started cleaning up the mess you left us.

I know that's going to make some of you angry, but it may be the fact that you GET angry over this rebuke that is INDICATIVE of the problem within you that CAUSED you to be the failure you have been.

You inherited a largely Christian nation and you left to us a largely APOSTATE nation.

You failed. Admit it and get out of our way.

Calvinism's resurgence in the last decade is CERTAINLY not the problem.

Christian contemporary music, though I dislike MOST of it, is not the problem.

The problem with this nation is not the homosexuals or the liberals and democrats- it is YOU. Judgment begins at the house of God. YOU are the problem.

Fundamentalists in that era became weird isolationists, almost cultic in nature failing miserably in the fulfillment of the great commission.

Academics in that area became theologically liberal.

And the few who did not go to either extreme did tremendously well with what they had. W. A. Criswell, Adrian Rogers, D. James Kennedy and others CONDEMNED their "Christian" generation and rightly so- because those few had to carry the torch to us with little help from MOST of the Christian adults of their era.

Now it is time for you to admit your failure, humble yourselves and be willing to acknowledge that the ideals you promoted should rapidly be replaced with fresh biblical ideas.

When we younger folks hear you talk about Still Standing for the Old Paths, we cringe. Because we know that you know very little about the Old Paths. What you mean by Old Paths is what you liked when you were a kid.

You are not trying to preserve the Old Biblical Paths- you are trying to preserve a culture THAT LOST THIS NATION.

Stop. Let it die. It needs to. Pass the torch that you have let dwindle to a faint flicker before it goes out altogether.

Thanks.

Take either the US or Great Britain....BOTH of them are shadows of the possible glory they both once might have had....Folks...you may like Luke's assessment or not: It's a "generalization"...yes... But "generalizations" exist ony because they are "generally" true...and truth is, Luke is "generally" correct.

On the whole: "Generally" the onus of this OP is absolutely true...and you may deny it as you will (of course you will but what's new?)

The OP is right-on:thumbs::thumbs::wavey:
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Don't pretend for one second that you know a thing about "Pelagianism"...or what is was..or what Pelagius himself believed...you don't..

And almost NO ONE on this board is even "Pelagian" anyway...

You mock yourself. :laugh:

Only you know eveerything oh great and almighty oz...:laugh:
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Take either the US or Great Britain....BOTH of them are shadows of the possible glory they both once might have had....Folks...you may like Luke's assessment or not: It's a "generalization"...yes... But "generalizations" exist ony because they are "generally" true...and truth is, Luke is "generally" correct.

On the whole: "Generally" the onus of this OP is absolutely true...and you may deny it as you will (of course you will but what's new?)

The OP is right-on:thumbs::thumbs::wavey:

Well I will give you this...your a consistant lunatic :thumbs:
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Only you know eveerything oh great and almighty oz...:laugh:

I don't know "everything"....I know the difference between "Arminianism" and
"Pelagianism" and you don't...if that makes me "OZ"....than, I accept the nomination..if it doesn't than I don't..But, you are "wrong" and I remain "right" about my definitions...That isn't arrogance, my friend..it's knowledge which is only bestowed by God's pre-determined Grace.:wavey:
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well I will give you this...your a consistant lunatic :thumbs:
And you are "inconsistent". History shall be the judge: You are patently not trying to debate but, merely insult at this point:
And it bores me. You win, ok how about that. And I think you meant to say: "'you're' a consistent lunatic" not "your" a consistent lunatic." Because that makes no sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And you are "inconsistent". History shall be the judge: You are patently not trying to debate but, merely insult at this point:
And it bores me. You win, ok how about that.

Why in Gods name would I ever want to debate you.....but hang around ....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why in Gods name would I ever want to debate you.....but hang around ...
I have no idea why you would...I wouldn't...

I would NEVER debate me, and yet YOU DO! Only you can answer that question, and similarly, it appears that only YOU can prevent forest fires.:wavey:
And yes, I am quite entertaining...thank you for noticing..and guess what...Luke's OP was right...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have no idea why you would...I wouldn't...

I would NEVER debate me, and yet YOU DO! Only you can answer that question, and similarly, it appears that only YOU can prevent forest fires.:wavey:
And yes, I am quite entertaining...thank you for noticing..and guess what...Luke's OP was right...

Funny stuff..when is your next act??:laugh:
 

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
Knew this thread would go nowhere . . fast. And it is living down to my first evaluation.

Maybe I should close it on general principles . . .:tonofbricks:
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Knew this thread would go nowhere . . fast. And it is living down to my first evaluation.

Maybe I should close it on general principles . . .:tonofbricks:

Yes, let's not dare challenge anyone's thinking and declare it to be wrong and dangerous and that it needs to be replaced or we lose this nation.

Let's just visit and pet each other's ego.

That's a much better use of our time.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
While there are some truths there in the post, we cannot simply blame our elders while we do very little to make a difference ourselves.

The scriptures remind us to "reject foolish and ignorant disputes, knowing that they breed quarrels." (2 Tim 2:23 HCSB)

Our mandate is not to point the finger of blame; it lies elsewhere - and the Word leaves little doubt as to what it is.

I don't mean this as an attack- I really don't. But this wrong and I'll tell you why.

You have to confront the current paradigm if you are going to build a better one. God told Jeremiah to tear down before he built up.

You cannot present right thinking in an age anchored to wrong thinking if you don't address the wrong thinking.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Who are you to offer such a rebuke? Your pleading ignorance would be comical if it were not for the shame it reflects upon you. If you knew the scriptures you would have either re-phrased your post or kept your keys silent:



You are the one in need of rebuke for the sin of casting those older than you in negative light. I suggest you acquaint yourself with the 9th commandment.

This is the problem.

A very BASIC law of hermeneutics is that you don't force passages to apply universally when they have a specific context they are supposed to apply to.

If you think this one verse condemns ANYONE from ever rebuking an elder then you don't know enough about how to interpret the Bible to speak about it.

But, just for the record, I did point out that D. James Kennedy, Adrian Rogers and W. A. Criswell condemned their own generation as well.

How many witnesses do you need??
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Nah. If God has anything to do with you, you find out how little you know, how great is your own failure, and you will think back to my post, and you will say, He was right.

You're about to enter the School of Hard Knocks. Tuition due and extracted throughout the lesson.

Empty rhetoric. I am amazed at the lack of character and courage of those who can throw stones from a safe distance and run for the hills if the person they bloody comes to confront them.

You do this drive-by posting mess because you cannot make a case for what you purport.

Any coward can throw stones from a safe distance and run and hide.

If you made a case for what you are saying, you know I would dismantle it and show how shallow your thinking is.

That's why you hit and run.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
"History is the story of events, with praise or blame." Cotton Mather

Certainly things have changed, not all for the better. Certainly the previous generation of church goers weren't perfect.

But in a bigger picture, I can see both society and the church evolving over the past centuries - in both good/productive ways and bad. I'm sure that my parents' generation probably looked back at my grandparents'/great-grandparents' church conduct and Christian walk and could point the finger to both blame and praise.

King Solomon said that there was nothing new under the sun.

Couldn't the new generation of Christians who are struggling with maturity be doing so because they are so blasted busy all the time with things that really don't matter?

Hasn't technology - which was supposed to have freed up our time for us to lead better lives - merely caused us to waste our time?

I think it's really and terribly harsh to say that my parents' generation is the reason that my students' generation is struggling with spiritual issues.


There are these pesky little things called facts that detractors on here seem to want to avoid like the plague.

Facts like:

1- Prayer was not taken out of school in the 90's- it was the 60's

2- Drugs did not become an epidemic with generation x. This happened on the previous generation's watch.

3- Divorce became common place- not in the 80's and 90's- but in the 60's and 70's.

4- AIDS became an epidemic in the 60's and 70's.

5- Roe v. wade passed in the early 70's.

6- Kids today are not gathering by the tens of thousands and having mass sex orgies on the White house lawn. No. That happened in the 60's.


And we could go on and on...

Facts are what matter.

not feelings.

Facts.
 

Herald

New Member
This is the problem.

A very BASIC law of hermeneutics is that you don't force passages to apply universally when they have a specific context they are supposed to apply to.

If you think this one verse condemns ANYONE from ever rebuking an elder then you don't know enough about how to interpret the Bible to speak about it.

But, just for the record, I did point out that D. James Kennedy, Adrian Rogers and W. A. Criswell condemned their own generation as well.

How many witnesses do you need??

Mr. Brown, I never mentioned rebuking an elder (as in the office of elder). I am and elder, and I was lovingly rebuked by a member a few years ago. The result? I repented of a sinful attitude and my friendship with this brother deepened because of the love he displayed towards me. Your post is devoid of love or compassion. You assume the role of a railing prophet. There may be a time for that, but not on an Internet discussion board.

I am part of a generation that has produced some faithful men of God, who proclaim the truth. It is a fallacy that the Norman Rockwell generation was better or somehow more godly. Just do a study of the patristic age and you will see a society bent on sin. Righteousness has always been fighting an uphill battle. It will continue to do so until the Lord returns.

I generally appreciate your defense of the truth in your posts, but are you willing to accept some pastoral counsel provided in love? Even though you may have added a "legal" caveat to your OP, the acerbic nature of your post did produce a sweeping indictment. There are many faithful men in that same generation, and somehow your post served only to trivialize their contribution to the faith. I urge you to consider that.
 
Top