• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Generational Failure

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There are these pesky little things called facts that detractors on here seem to want to avoid like the plague.

Facts like:

1- Prayer was not taken out of school in the 90's- it was the 60's


Prayer has not been taken out of prayer. There is prayer before every examination. What the Supreme Court ruled was no one can write a prayer and say everyone must say this prayer. It was a good ruling.

2- Drugs did not become an epidemic with generation x. This happened on the previous generation's watch.

There were drugs around since long before the previous generation you speak of, alcohol for instance has been abused since before Columbus. Do you have any knowledge of the Opium Wars?

3- Divorce became common place- not in the 80's and 90's- but in the 60's and 70's.

Especially back when it was impossible for a woman to be granted a divorce or to own property, or to vote, etc.

4- AIDS became an epidemic in the 60's and 70's.

What about syphilis, gonorrhea, and other STDs etc. ?

5- Roe v. wade passed in the early 70's.

1973 to be exact ... and how many young women lost their lives in the back room abortion mills prior to that?

6- Kids today are not gathering by the tens of thousands and having mass sex orgies on the White house lawn. No. That happened in the 60's.

Nor are the kids today demonstration for justice for all, for doing away with discrimination? Just what is it they stand for today? And, are you saying they no longer have premarital sex?


And we could go on and on...

Facts are what matter.

not feelings.

Facts.

And you are very selective in your facts.

Again, why do you attack other Christians?
 

12strings

Active Member
I don't mean this as an attack- I really don't. But this wrong and I'll tell you why.

You have to confront the current paradigm if you are going to build a better one. God told Jeremiah to tear down before he built up.

You cannot present right thinking in an age anchored to wrong thinking if you don't address the wrong thinking.

1. I refer you to Harold's post #40

2. I re-read the OP, and I fail to see EXACTLY what your average 65-year-old Christian is supposed to get out of it. Here's the central specifics you give:

Fundamentalists in that era became weird isolationists...Academics in that area became theologically liberal.

Now it is time for you to admit your failure, humble yourselves and be willing to acknowledge that the ideals you promoted should rapidly be replaced with fresh biblical ideas...

...You are not trying to preserve the Old Biblical Paths- you are trying to preserve a culture THAT LOST THIS NATION.

Assuming I were a 65 year-old baby boomer (I'm not, I'm about half that old), trying hard to read your post with humility and learn from it, what exactly does repentance look like? I don't think your post tells me, unless it is simply to stop trying be involved in your church and let the young people do everything. It just says, you failed, let somebody else do it.

Especially assuming I was niether an isolationist fundamentalist, or a Liberal...what's my take-away? What exactly should I do differently now in order to better please God?

Assuming I am your average 65 year old church-goer, what paradigm have you broken down? Perhaps you have helped me see that my generation's time was not as full of roses as I dreamed, but that could apply to ANY generation.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
1. I refer you to Harold's post #40

2. I re-read the OP, and I fail to see EXACTLY what your average 65-year-old Christian is supposed to get out of it. Here's the central specifics you give:



Assuming I were a 65 year-old baby boomer (I'm not, I'm about half that old), trying hard to read your post with humility and learn from it, what exactly does repentance look like? I don't think your post tells me, unless it is simply to stop trying be involved in your church and let the young people do everything. It just says, you failed, let somebody else do it.

Especially assuming I was niether an isolationist fundamentalist, or a Liberal...what's my take-away? What exactly should I do differently now in order to better please God?

Assuming I am your average 65 year old church-goer, what paradigm have you broken down? Perhaps you have helped me see that my generation's time was not as full of roses as I dreamed, but that could apply to ANY generation.

Now this is a very fair and thoughtful critique of the op. it is refreshing and I thank you.

What I want baby boomers to do is examine their ideals, find the errors in them that have cost the church so dearly on their watch and correct them.

Humility ITSELF is a goal as well. Many of these folks seem to think quite pompously and clearly erroneously that they led the golden age of Christianity. They need to humble way down and stop that nonsense.

Along the same vein they are so critical of the upcoming generations. An OUNCE of real introspection would silence that drivel.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Mr. Brown, I never mentioned rebuking an elder (as in the office of elder). I am and elder, and I was lovingly rebuked by a member a few years ago. The result? I repented of a sinful attitude and my friendship with this brother deepened because of the love he displayed towards me. Your post is devoid of love or compassion. You assume the role of a railing prophet. There may be a time for that, but not on an Internet discussion board.

I am part of a generation that has produced some faithful men of God, who proclaim the truth. It is a fallacy that the Norman Rockwell generation was better or somehow more godly. Just do a study of the patristic age and you will see a society bent on sin. Righteousness has always been fighting an uphill battle. It will continue to do so until the Lord returns.

I generally appreciate your defense of the truth in your posts, but are you willing to accept some pastoral counsel provided in love? Even though you may have added a "legal" caveat to your OP, the acerbic nature of your post did produce a sweeping indictment. There are many faithful men in that same generation, and somehow your post served only to trivialize their contribution to the faith. I urge you to consider that.

I could not have been more clear that wonderful people of God came out of Ross above their generation. I even named some. But what I think you may not like about the op is the very thing I think we should be aiming for in arguments of this import. They SHOULD BE STINGING.

That is one of the main things these generations dropped the ball on.

But I don't honestly think your rebuke has merit seeing as how I was very clear about the exceptions.

What you may want me to do is take the stinger out of the post- when you take the punch out it becomes worthless. That is what a lot of sermons and arguments are today- so focused on congeniality that they lose the ability to to impact.

I think this is a common error today left us by, yes, the hippy generation.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Empty rhetoric. I am amazed at the lack of character and courage of those who can throw stones from a safe distance and run for the hills if the person they bloody comes to confront them.

You do this drive-by posting mess because you cannot make a case for what you purport.

Any coward can throw stones from a safe distance and run and hide.

If you made a case for what you are saying, you know I would dismantle it and show how shallow your thinking is.

That's why you hit and run.
You'll see. :type:
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
What I want baby boomers to do is examine their ideals, find the errors in them that have cost the church so dearly on their watch and correct them.

Humility ITSELF is a goal as well. Many of these folks seem to think quite pompously and clearly erroneously that they led the golden age of Christianity. They need to humble way down and stop that nonsense.

Along the same vein they are so critical of the upcoming generations. An OUNCE of real introspection would silence that drivel.
You start with "I Want."
Then TEN times you point the figure at another generation, perhaps for things you are not doing yourself. Do you ever think of taking some responsibility?

Rebuke not an elder except in the presence of two or three witnesses.
Your opinions are not validated facts; just opinions.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Luke2427- If you don't mind me asking, what is your age? Your avatar is fuzzy just enough to show you as either a 25 year old or a 55 year old.
 

Herald

New Member
Okay, Luke. I will take you point by point.

If you were an adult in the early sixties to late seventies, you should know that your generation LOST this nation.

I should? Why? Did I miss the memo?


Luke2427 said:
The way you did church FAILED.

How did we "do church"?

Luke2427 said:
Now that does not apply to EVERY SINGLE church and Christian of that generation, but it does apply to the generation by and large.

I still have no idea what you are referring to. I am still stuck on the "doing church" part. The part that my Baby Boomer generation apparently got wrong.

Luke2427 said:
It's time for you to take responsibility and to pass the torch and let the younger generation get started cleaning up the mess you left us.

Mess? What mess are you referring to? Details, please.

Luke2427 said:
I know that's going to make some of you angry, but it may be the fact that you GET angry over this rebuke that is INDICATIVE of the problem within you that CAUSED you to be the failure you have been.

It is your your accusation without details that is upsetting me.

Luke2427 said:
You inherited a largely Christian nation and you left to us a largely APOSTATE nation.

Really? You mean the pre-Baby Boomer America was largely Christian? I am sure you are serious about this, so I am sure you have empirical data to back up your claim. Do share.

Luke2427 said:
You failed. Admit it and get out of our way.

Failed? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Luke2427 said:
Calvinism's resurgence in the last decade is CERTAINLY not the problem.

As a Calvinist I am interested in knowing what it is my soteriology is not the problem of. You still have not told me.

Luke2427 said:
Christian contemporary music, though I dislike MOST of it, is not the problem.

Great. I do not listen to much CCM. I am glad to know it is not the problem. But what is it not the problem of?

Luke2427 said:
The problem with this nation is not the homosexuals or the liberals and democrats- it is YOU. Judgment begins at the house of God. YOU are the problem.

I am the problem? *sniff* *sniff* Yep. I took a bath. What is it that I did wrong, or am I one of those exceptions you mentioned. If I am, that is great news. I STILL have no idea what it is I have not done.

Luke2427 said:
Fundamentalists in that era became weird isolationists, almost cultic in nature failing miserably in the fulfillment of the great commission.

Where are those examples? You know, the hard data to support your claim.

Luke2427 said:
Academics in that area became theologically liberal.

You are a few decades too late. John Murray left Princeton Seminary decades before the Baby Boomer generation because it went liberal.

Luke2427 said:
And the few who did not go to either extreme did tremendously well with what they had. W. A. Criswell, Adrian Rogers, D. James Kennedy and others CONDEMNED their "Christian" generation and rightly so- because those few had to carry the torch to us with little help from MOST of the Christian adults of their era.

You must have forgot those quotes from the men you mentioned.

Luke2427 said:
Now it is time for you to admit your failure, humble yourselves and be willing to acknowledge that the ideals you promoted should rapidly be replaced with fresh biblical ideas.

Which ideals?

Luke2427 said:
When we younger folks hear you talk about Still Standing for the Old Paths, we cringe. Because we know that you know very little about the Old Paths. What you mean by Old Paths is what you liked when you were a kid.

Which old paths (Proverbs 22:28 )?

Luke2427 said:
You are not trying to preserve the Old Biblical Paths- you are trying to preserve a culture THAT LOST THIS NATION.

What culture are we trying to preserve?

Luke2427 said:
Stop. Let it die. It needs to. Pass the torch that you have let dwindle to a faint flicker before it goes out altogether.

Let what die? You have not told us anything yet.
 

12strings

Active Member
Okay, Luke. I will take you point by point.



I should? Why? Did I miss the memo?




How did we "do church"?



I still have no idea what you are referring to. I am still stuck on the "doing church" part. The part that my Baby Boomer generation apparently got wrong.



Mess? What mess are you referring to? Details, please.



It is your your accusation without details that is upsetting me.



Really? You mean the pre-Baby Boomer America was largely Christian? I am sure you are serious about this, so I am sure you have empirical data to back up your claim. Do share.



Failed? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.



As a Calvinist I am interested in knowing what it is my soteriology is not the problem of. You still have not told me.



Great. I do not listen to much CCM. I am glad to know it is not the problem. But what is it not the problem of?



I am the problem? *sniff* *sniff* Yep. I took a bath. What is it that I did wrong, or am I one of those exceptions you mentioned. If I am, that is great news. I STILL have no idea what it is I have not done.



Where are those examples? You know, the hard data to support your claim.



You are a few decades too late. John Murray left Princeton Seminary decades before the Baby Boomer generation because it went liberal.



You must have forgot those quotes from the men you mentioned.



Which ideals?



Which old paths (Proverbs 22:28 )?



What culture are we trying to preserve?



Let what die? You have not told us anything yet.

My point exactly...Luke hasn't "demolished" any "paradigms" yet.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
You start with "I Want."
Then TEN times you point the figure at another generation, perhaps for things you are not doing yourself. Do you ever think of taking some responsibility?

Rebuke not an elder except in the presence of two or three witnesses.
Your opinions are not validated facts; just opinions.

It is typically acceptable to say "I want" in answer to the question "What do you want?"

:rolleyes:
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Okay, Luke. I will take you point by point.



I should? Why? Did I miss the memo?

Do you require a memo to do anything?


How did we "do church"?

Conservatives were largely isolationists who did not engage culture and became almost monastic.

Liberals were... well... liberal.

Then, when some moved away from isolationism man-centeredness became the damnable characteristic. Still there are those backward isolationist type churches that glorify the music and culture of the period that lost this nation. Many of them are IFB.

I still have no idea what you are referring to. I am still stuck on the "doing church" part. The part that my Baby Boomer generation apparently got wrong.

Hopefully it is clear to you now.



Mess? What mess are you referring to? Details, please.

Now, I think this is a silly, silly question.

I could not have been clearer. There are not words in mortal tongue that could have been clearer.

Divorce, broken homes, children raised without their fathers in the home, declining church numbers, AIDS, godlessness and atheism rampant in our schools, abortion, etc...

Is this not a mess to you??

Do you not know that these things exploded in the 60's and 70's??

Really?

It is your your accusation without details that is upsetting me.

Do I need to cite sources to prove to you that water is wet???

Do you really need that?


Really? You mean the pre-Baby Boomer America was largely Christian? I am sure you are serious about this, so I am sure you have empirical data to back up your claim. Do share.

The generation that was adult well before the 60's and 70's did have prayer in schools and the Bible was a school text book and abortion was illegal and AIDS was not an epidemic and drugs, yes, include alcohol if you wish, did not COMPARE to that of the 60s and 70s.

I thought everybody knew that.

I did not realize I was speaking to someone that uninformed.

Yes, I could go back and do the citing, but most of us know this is not necessary.

Most of us are very familiar with the year 1963 when sanctioned prayer was taken out of our schools.

Most of us are very familiar with what happened in 1973.

But if you still require education about these things, yes, I will do the research work for you. Just let me know.

Failed? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Then you prefer Great Awakening?

Or do you prefer "extraordinary success of Christianity in the culture during the 60's and 70's"?

As a Calvinist I am interested in knowing what it is my soteriology is not the problem of. You still have not told me.

It is resurging in our culture TODAY. Most folks recognize that it waned greatly in this culture during the middle of the last century.

Therefore, Arminians cannot justify the witch hunt, especially prevalent in the SBC, that they have launched against Calvinists. It was not Calvinists who lost this nation.

Calvinists largely founded this nation. But this nation became a moral cesspool in the last century under largely Arminian reign.



Great. I do not listen to much CCM. I am glad to know it is not the problem. But what is it not the problem of?


It is not what has caused the church to lose this nation. I don't like it. But it is not even part of the problem because this nation was largely lost during the days of Southern Gospel styled convention music in churches.

I am the problem? *sniff* *sniff* Yep. I took a bath. What is it that I did wrong, or am I one of those exceptions you mentioned. If I am, that is great news. I STILL have no idea what it is I have not done.

I don't know you from Adam. I don;t know how old you are. But I also think it is pretty obvious that I am talking about a generation as a whole- not any specific individual.


Where are those examples? You know, the hard data to support your claim.

Let me know if I need to do the research for you. I will.

You are a few decades too late. John Murray left Princeton Seminary decades before the Baby Boomer generation because it went liberal.

And?

You must have forgot those quotes from the men you mentioned.

I'm not writing a research paper. I am pointing out things that I thought most people already knew and did not need them cited.

You did not know that Adrian Rogers said, for example, that he estimated that 85% of SBC church members were unconverted??

I thought everybody on baptistboard would know that.

Which old paths (Proverbs 22:28 )?

Take, for example, Gregory's statement in a previous thread that he preferred the "old hymns of the faith.... like 'I'd Rather Have Jesus'"

He thinks the old faith is the faith that existed in the 50's, 60's and 70's. Any one who has ever been to an "old fashioned camp meeting" like I grew up going to has heard countless morons talk about the "old paths" in reference to the way the church was in the days of their youth.

I contend that that is the LAST place we need to get back to because it was during those years that we lost our culture.


What culture are we trying to preserve?

I'm not trying to preserve it- I am trying to conquer it with the Gospel of Christ.

We certainly did not gain ground in the 60's and 70's. We lost it- tremendously.


Let what die? You have not told us anything yet.

The mentalities that the church had that caused the church to lose this nation.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
I want you to take the same responsibility you accuse others of not taking.
Open your eyes.

Fine.

I want you to take some too.

Arent you old. Shouldn't you lead the way?

Do you take any responsibility?

Or are you under the delusion that your generation was wonderful?
 

Luke2427

Active Member
You'll see. :type:

When, O Prophet, should I expect these terrible, terrible judgments to overtake me?

If you get cancer in the next six months, should I conclude it is the judgment of God on you for the way you speak to me?

If your church throws you out in the street should I conclude that it is God's lesson for you?

What judgments should I be looking for, seer, and when should they come?

And do you anticipate any coming your way?
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
O.K....I'll bite...only because I know History as well as you do, and you use it as a bludgeon in the most un-godly sort of ways:
Prayer has not been taken out of prayer.
You meant "prayer has not been taken out of schools"...
There is prayer before every examination. What the Supreme Court ruled was no one can write a prayer and say everyone must say this prayer. It was a good ruling.
Negative....it was abyssmal actually, I must assume you refer to O'hare's ruling...the angry Atheist took her case to EVERY court known to man over the course of YEARS!!!...Every state court shut her down, every single Federal District Court shut her down...There was no appreciation for the concept of Stare Decesis in that SCOTUS ruling...
Nor was there in Griswold vs. Connecticut...the landmark case used byJustice Black to justify child murder in Roe v. Wade.
Truth is...Maryland had EVERY right (Constitutionally) to DEMAND that every one sound off to the Virgin Mary if they felt like it. It was a Catholic Colony. (hence the name..get it?) The Constitution ABSOLUTELY permits any given state to impose any religious requirements it sees fit!!! If Alabama wants to pass a law that ONLY Presbyterians may hold public office...it is WELL within Alabama's right to do so...."CONGRESS" sir...."CONGRESS" (that is not the Commonwealth of Maryland in case you didn't get the memo) may "pass NO LAW RESPECTING"...establishment of religion...nor restricting the free excercise thereof...
There were drugs around since long before the previous generation you speak of, alcohol for instance has been abused since before Columbus. Do you have any knowledge of the Opium Wars?
Cute....You mention alcohol, which resulted in some weirdness I'd prefer not to debate between Noah and his son Ham and Lot's being the "victim" of "incest" (he should insist on abortion here I assume)...and then ignore the patent level of OBVIOUS over-abuse relevant to the last few decades by equivocating....and.....
Yes....I know about the "OPIUM WARS"....What's your point?
So....Great Britain (not the US generally assumed in this forum)...in the 19th century fought a negligibly signifigant war respecting the international trade of Opium (used in perfectly LEGAL Laudanum, at the time in order to protect their international trade interests....So what????

Uh, ok..so I assume this is relevant to the pot-smoking hippies of the United States in the 60's??? This is what Philosophers call a "Red-Herring"...(You are attempting to make Luke chase an irrelevancy)....sorry...not stupid enough to follow, try again.
Especially back when it was impossible for a woman to be granted a divorce or to own property, or to vote, etc.
Actually, Divorce since the 80's (but ONLY amongst younger people) has stabilized and become LESS COMMON Than it was amongst people of the same age-group (20's and 30's) as it was in the previous generation 60's-80's... YOUR Generation, not Luke's was more likely to get a divorce between the ages of 20-35 than his is, but let's not let facts stand in our way :smilewinkgrin:

This is CLASSIC equivocation... do you mean in the US or Britain?...Do you mean POST-Constitution or Prior?...To Which SPECIFIC State or Commonwealth do you refer??? In Pennsylvania (for instance) ALL of those were legal from Day UNO, day ONE!!!! You are over-generalizing. Different STATES=Different RULES...And it's perfectly consistent with the Constitution BTW.....
What about syphilis, gonorrhea, and other STDs etc. ?
Dunno...Answer your OWN question...What about them???? They are in fact curable, and not particullarly specific to homosexuality in the way that AIDS is...so what? Syphillis is as old as Blackbeard the Pirate (William Tell) demanding Syphillis-treating medical supplies from the City of Charlesfort S.C. in ransom for the kid-napped governor's daughter...SO what? We get it....You have suggested that certain venereal diseases exist...You have already proven that certain forms of drug-abuse exist and always have...What's YOUR POINT though? answer your OWN QUESTION FIRST...SO WHAT??
1973 to be exact ... and how many young women lost their lives in the back room abortion mills prior to that?
I'll say this as clearly as I can....I DON'T CARE what the fate of any woman who would murder her own baby's fate is...She got...the "Death Penalty"...She deserved it, and She got what was coming to her...Take it to the bank and love it. :thumbs: I defend the life of the INNOCENT! not the GUILTY...The un-born child is the innocent one the murderous harlot who tried to slaughter it in cold-blood is the "guilty"...Decisions have consequences :1_grouphug:
And, are you saying they no longer have premarital sex?
No...he is saying they no longer have sex orgies on the White-House Lawn...did you read his post??
And you are very selective in your facts.
Possibly...So am I...Guess what .....so are YOU!!!!!
Again, why do you attack other Christians?[/size][/color]
Faithful are the wounds of a friend...he isn't "attacking" them....he loves them. And...he is cutt-throat about it. Yes, it's a little "Take no prisoners"...But ya know what?? You NEED it, and you have it coming. I know plenty a Godly Christian from the very generation who has been spoken to in THIS PRECISE MANNER (Luke's, and it is harsh)...who will come in tears and say "Thank-You"...for finally giving it to them straight....Seen it myself.:godisgood:
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
When, O Prophet, should I expect these terrible, terrible judgments to overtake me?

If you get cancer in the next six months, should I conclude it is the judgment of God on you for the way you speak to me?

If your church throws you out in the street should I conclude that it is God's lesson for you?

What judgments should I be looking for, seer, and when should they come?

And do you anticipate any coming your way?
Your main error is in the presumption that any human individual, generation or collective, Christian or non-, can sustain the church. Your lessons will come in the form of your illusions meeting reality. You will learn what it means to be broken. That's assuming, of course, that God has anything to do with you.

Give you younger ones a chance? To do what? Fail? Okay. :type:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Luke2427

Active Member
Your main error is in the presumption that any human individual, generation or collective, Christian or non-, can sustain the church.

How silly. God uses means.

God has ordained all things that come to pass but he brings them to pass through means. Through "human individuals, generations, etc..."


This sit-back-on-your-laurels-cause-God-only-revives-cultures is not biblical Christianity nor is it true Calvinism.

What you need is a good dose of true Calvinistic evangelical fervor.

Your lessons will come in the form of your illusions meeting reality. You will learn what it means to be broken.

You have no idea what I have been through. You don't know how broken I am.

Being broken doesn't abate boldness- it fuels it. Consider Peter's denial of Christ and his preaching at Pentecost and for the rest of his days.

That's assuming, of course, that God has anything to do with you.

Do you assume he has anything to do with you?

Give you younger ones a chance? To do what? Fail? Okay. :type:
I don't even know what this is referring to.
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What you need is a good dose of true Calvinistic evangelical fervor.
As a non-Calvinist, is it weird that I think that I PERFECTLY understand what "true Calvinistic evangelical fervor" is?...and I agree actually. It does.
Perhaps something like "True Arminianist Evangelistic fervor"...leads to certain absurd errors...and I understand that "True Calvinistic Evangelistic Fervor" is also a good thing...and yes, the church needs "True Fervor" whether it comes from some Arms or Cals...Yes, let the best man win.
You have no idea what I have been through. You don't know how broken I am.
Being broken doesn't abate boldness- it fuels it. Consider Peter's denial of Christ and his preaching at Pentecost and for the rest of his days.
Peter got his humiliation...and Jesus told him in no uncertain terms what would happen to him if he proclaimed the gospel see:
Jhn 21:18 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry [thee] whither thou wouldest not.
Jhn 21:19 This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.

Peter knew EXACTLY what he had coming...and he was AFRAID of it..But he had courage. Courage accepts the fact that Jesus himself has told you you would die horribly for the faith, and that you wet yourself somewhat when thinking about it...and then you preach and "feed my sheep" as Christ asked you knowing the penalty....
Some of you guys will get it. :jesus:

As Baptists...(Paul idolaters) we sometimes miss exactly how great an apostle Peter really was:

Peter KNEW without a doubt that he would die for the faith
Peter had denied Christ once......
He wept bitterly......
Christ confronted him on it..
He NEVER did it AGAIN.....

I really LOVE that guy...lots to learn from Peter. He spent his ENTIRE ministry KNOWING what was gonna happen :) My, how much awe there is in a God who can change such a man as he.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
As a non-Calvinist, is it weird that I think that I PERFECTLY understand what "true Calvinistic evangelical fervor" is?...and I agree actually. It does.
Perhaps something like "True Arminianist Evangelistic fervor"...leads to certain absurd errors...and I understand that "True Calvinistic Evangelistic Fervor" is also a good thing...and yes, the church needs "True Fervor" whether it comes from some Arms or Cals...Yes, let the best man win.

I repudiate ANY theology that quells evangelistic fervor.

I had much, MUCH rather yoke up with a thorough Arminian who believes fervently in the Great Commission than with a thorough Calvinist who thinks that since God will save who he wills then nobody needs to be aggressive about reaching the lost.

I have NO respect for the Calvinist who thinks that way.
 
Top