1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

God and TIME

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Jarthur001, Jul 20, 2006.

  1. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob,


    This is the verse...

    This is your words....


    Notice foreknow is not in the verse.
    Notice predestined is not in the verse.

    But..being that you bring this up a lot...lets look at it.

    [to be] conformed 4832... summorphos...having the same form as another

    lets write it out as we go.

    so not changing the context we can write..."predestined to have the same form as" ...

    to the image 1504...eikon.....Image

    so not changing the context we can write...predestined to have the same form as the image

    of his 846...autos....His

    so not changing the context we can write...predestined to have the same form as the image of God

    Son 5207, ....huios..son of man..

    so not changing the context we can write...predestined to have the same form as the image of God's Son

    Therefore not changing the context we can write...We are "predestined to have the same form as the image of God's Son".

    Who can be just like ....in the same form.....be the very likeness of Gods Son?
    The elect or the non elect?

    Now that addresses your line from romans 8. I now need to support this view if I can from other verse. Notice the context above is not changed..and the following verses will support the context.

    "My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you..." (Gal. 4:19)...in this verse it is the elect.

    "are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory" (2 Cor. 3:18)...in this verse it is the elect.

    Therefore..it is fair to read..and not change the context

    "The elect was predestined to have the same form as the image of God's Son"

    Now when was this done? Again..lets look at context.

    The full context is verse 29 of romans 8

    according to this verse...it was in the past..."Foreknow". God does not work in time. Well...He wants us to believe this is in the past, or He would not have said it. Do you believe God wanted "fore" to be in the Bible to show us ...or even make us think it was in the past? Or..do you think God made a mistake here and is trying to confuse us?

    But why did God predestinate us? Does Know in foreknow mean He choose us because He knew we would believe..or does it mean He knows all things? Well...again...lets look at the context. Notice it never says anything about believeing here. This is about election. Now in other places where it talks about faith..it does say one must believe. In those places..it says nothing about election..does it? So...why?

    Notice the 1st one in verse 29. "For"
    You have heard this a 1000 times. When you see the word for...look back to see what its there for. :) Anytime you see "for" at the start of a verse...it is linked to the verse right before it. Lets look at verse 28 to see why.


    So..going by context...the meaning is now clear and can be read...

    And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

    and your verse...
    is talking about the faith that the elect must have to be saved and not about foreknowing. The word is not even in the verse.
     
  2. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes He is God.
     
  3. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello Webdog...

    When God choose to use the word "Foreknow" in the Bible..what time frame do you feel He wanted us to believe this took place?

    NOW?

    The future?

    The past?

    Was He trying to trick us into thinking this took place in the past...or do you think He really wanted us to believe it took place in the past, because it did?
    Do you think the tense "fore" the closes He could come to our understanding?...or should God have used another word?
     
  4. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    LOL. I think that sums up the problem pretty well.
     
  5. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    aw, thank you James for writing that out as we go. Reminds me of the old school days when the teachers all had an 8th grade education.

    No but "HOPE" is in the Chapter just before this foreknew starts and HOPE is (Faith is the substance) in other words what something is, (Faith is the substance of things HOPED for) So we see our HOPE is made up of our FAITH of which you so conveintly want to leave out of all the Scriptures and I don't know why if you want the truth.

    Now "FOREKNEW" God sees us believe so HE FOREKNOWS who the believers are you do understand that is FOREKNEW before Salvation don't you? If He see us BELIEVE that is FOREKNEW before He predestinates us to be conformed to the image of His Son, If He saw us BELIEVE you do know that is FOREKNEW before predestination don't you? Then, He calls us, of course you know He FOREKNEW us beleive before He calls us don't you, then He GLORIFIES us and even you have to say "well that is yet to come" so again, He FOREKNEW us before He GLORIFIES us.

    Again, Calvinist have to leave out BELIEF/FAITH or HOPE in this case which is made up of FAITH.

    We don't have to leave out nothing.

    If I saw you praying and shedding tears and crying to God before you came to me and said you felt God had forgive you. Then I think you could call it I FOREKNEW that you were in trouble over your sins.

    If God see us BELIEVE in Him, then I think we could say he FOREKNEW us before Salvation, so He knew who to make Christ like, or predestinate.

    But, God also sees all, FORE, NOW, and even you say in Glorified AFTER. You want to use AFTER when it comes to GLORIFIED, but not the FORE when it comes to BELIEF.

    As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
     
    #65 Brother Bob, Jul 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 22, 2006
  6. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    How could He learn something "new" when He sees from the beginning who believes, He sees now who believes and He sees in the end who believes. How could it be knew to Him? Do you believe God sees how you will die and when?

    So, you apparently saying that God Foreknew who believes.
    If you believe that God Foreknew the saved then why is it so hard to believe that God Foreknew who believes that Jesus is the Son of God, then calls, predestinates, justifies, glorifies. What is the problem? Why do the Calvinist want to leave out "believe"? Calvinist sure must have a huge problem reading all the rest of the Bible outside of a few verses in Romans and Ephesians when they read all about "thy faith hath saved thee", "thy faith hath made thee whole", "believe in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved". "preach the gospel to every creature and he that believeth shall be saved" on and on through the whole Bible. What must bother them the most is when Jesus says it for "Salvation belongs to Jesus" and he says "you must believe to be saved". amazing :)
     
    #66 Brother Bob, Jul 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 22, 2006
  7. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no backward or forward with God.

    You say and want us to believe that God looked in the future and saw His Son die but He sees Him as slain before the world then why could He not see Him slain now? What would be the difference. You want a FORE but not an AFTER. That is foolish. You want a timeless God before but you don't want a timeless God AFTER. lol

    Matter of fact, You have to have a timeless God FORE but when it comes to AFTER you find fault. ha

    Do you believe in a non all knowing God James? Do you think God works in the blind?

    Did God see His son slain before the foundation of the world James? Must of been timeless then but not now? :)
     
    #67 Brother Bob, Jul 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 22, 2006
  8. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are wrong. I say God is not bound just to time. But when God WORKS with man, He also works in time. Notice I always say God or Christ work can not be changed, for it is locked in time. God works in time when He works with Man, for man is matter and is part of time. God can also go beyond time.

    God elected in the past...and in each context where election is talked about...it always...each and every time...talks that God does this because of His pleasure. Even though you hate it Bob, fore is placed there to show it was done before you were born.

    If God did not want us to think it was in the past, why would he say past?

    In other words...the verse could have said..

    In whom he knew.....He also elected.

    In Romans 9, This is why God choose the 2nd son over the 1st son. It would have been easy to choose the 1st son, for in all familys the 1st son got the blessings. Yet God choose the 2nd son....why? Because He wanted to prove election. This is what the context says. This is what each context says....when election is talked about. You can't change that, no matter how many times you try Bob.

    Did God know? Yes He knew, but this was not the reason for His choice. Each time...each and every time...it says it is because of His pleasure. Why do you want to deny God that? You picked your wife to marry.

    This is it Bob....

    Forget everything I said above.

    Forget months of verses posted..........just anwser this.


    Can God choose His own bride according to His own pleasure just as the Bible says? yes...no?

    I'm glad God choose me before I was born, other wise He would have never choose me. (J Vernon McGhee)

    Wrong..
    It has nothing to do with God looking...you can't seem to "see" this. Your saying...God only picks people that love Him. God picked Paul, who was killing believers.

    God picks not because we loved Him....He picked us even though we didn't love Him. This is grace. Gods decree made it happen and now it can not be changed for it is of God and by God. :)
     
    #68 Jarthur001, Jul 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 22, 2006
  9. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0

    Time is for man and God is not bound by it. You say it is locked in time but I say it is locked in everlasting to everlasting. Don’t you believe God is everlasting to everlasting or is He a time God and locked there. You do not grasp that God can see all in all. He said I am that I am. You will admit that God was not locked in time when He saw His Son die before the foundation of the world. You will admit that God is not locked in time when He foreknew you. You just fail to see that if He foreknew you He foreknew that you believed and chose Him. That is where you err James. You want Him to foreknow some things but not all.
    Sure it was to His pleasure when He sees us believe and choose Him. You say in the past and again I say He is everlasting to everlasting of which you seem to be changing God to fit your theory.
    The Scriptures were written for our learning, not Gods!! He already knows all things why would it have to be written past, now or future for God when He is everlasting to everlasting.
    Easy to choose the first son? Yes, but God sees and He sees Esau sell his birthright before he was born so He said the elder shall serve the younger. God knows all. The difference between you and me James is that I believe in an "all knowing God".
    It pleased Him to pick the one who did not sell his birthright, why can’t you see that James?
    Not only can He choose His bride He did choose His bride and He chose the believers. New Jerusalem is the believers in Christ.

    Oh, but Paul was one of the Apostles of whom Jesus chose them all to fulfill His plan. Paul was a chosen vessel to preach to the Gentile nation. God also chose Judas so His plan could be fulfilled, but He chose Judas because He sees what Judas is: the son of perdition.
    peace
     
    #69 Brother Bob, Jul 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 22, 2006
  10. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Without the concept of time, you cannot have anything new, because there would be nothing old. So no, God did not learn something new. Everything is as everything is.
     
  11. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    Arthur,
    You seem to have take great delight in word games. Bob is right. God is outside time. That is something He created. He sees it all at once. You asked, can Christ, God travel in time. He is God. If He needed to and was in His nature, I suppose He would.

    We all here know Christ died once. We all know He will not do it again. The senerio of Christ going back in time to watch Himself crucified is nonsense, and to tell you the truth, I fail to see the edification of the subject or teaching. Maybe you should tune in to the Sci-Fi Channel.
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Does the word foreknow mean the same thing to us as it does to God? To us it means "know something beforehand"...which is a human statement given within time. You say God is not bound by time. Can God foreknow something, in the sense of time as we know it? If you say yes, He's not omniscient. To branch off even further, how does foreknow fit into God's omniscience? Think about it.
     
  13. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,420
    Likes Received:
    1,770
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Foreknow" is referring to "relationship", not "information". Relationship is a legitimate understanding for this word.

    Look at all the "relationship" language of Romans 8.

    v.28 "we know all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose".

    v.29 "firstborn among many brethren"

    v.31 "If God is for us, who is against us"

    v.32 "freely gives us all things"

    v.33 "Who will bring a charge against God's elect"

    v.34 "Christ Jesus....intercedes for us."

    v.35 "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ"

    v.37 "But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us."

    v.38-39 nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing, can "separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."

    Over and over Paul emphasizes the believer's relationship with God. "Foreknew" is another example of that. God "foreknew" us in an intimate relationship before the foundation of the world, and then predestined, called, justified, etc.
    peace to you:wavey:
     
  14. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is timeless, or from our point of view (POV), He is outside of time.


     
  15. El_Guero

    El_Guero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, God's use of the word forknowledge was referring to His use of the word relationship, but how does that allow you to a legal 'understanding' of the word 'relationship'?

    I think that definition is 'Greek to me'.

     
  16. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thats the whole point, No He didn't learn anything new. He sees it all at once how could He learn anything new when its all at once.
     
  17. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,420
    Likes Received:
    1,770
    Faith:
    Baptist
    From my "lexical aids to the New Testament":

    "Thus, proginosko, foreknow,...essentially includes a self-determining on God's part to this fellowship of Himself with the believers (Rom. 8:29) with whom God had beforehand entered into fellowship."

    peace to you:praying:
     
  18. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,420
    Likes Received:
    1,770
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Of course it is BBob. But there are those who maintain that God "saw" who would accept Christ, and then determined to "elect" them to salvation based on what they will do.

    That makes God respond to the righteous acts of men, instead of men responding to the Grace of God revealed in Christ.

    peace to you:praying:
     
  19. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry Canady but you still misunderstand me for when I say He sees, I mean He sees you believe not looks ahead and sees you believe but He sees all at once so He sees you believe, He predestinates, He calls, He justifies, He glorifies. The whole Bible is about "believing".
     
  20. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,420
    Likes Received:
    1,770
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And I say that not only does He see us believe, but He is the cause of our belief through Holy Spirit changing our natures, convicting us of the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, leading us to repentence and faith, and preserving us in His power. All of this according to the kind intention of His will, and according to His having a relationship with us before the foundation of the world.

    peace to you:praying:
     
Loading...