37818
Well-Known Member
Not in any way.So it is OK to disobey God, as long as death is not the enemy?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not in any way.So it is OK to disobey God, as long as death is not the enemy?
Then do you think the Bible should conform to paganism that states death is good, until it is not?Not in any way.
No.Then do you think the Bible should conform to paganism that states death is good, until it is not?
God never stated there was death, before Adam disobeyed. That is you "putting words" in "God's mouth".No.
There was such thing of death before the fall of Adam and Eve. God didn't lie.
God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Genesis 3:3, . . . God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.God never stated there was death, before Adam disobeyed.
Would like your thoughts.God never stated there was death, before Adam disobeyed. That is you "putting words" in "God's mouth".
Death only resulted from one particular sin, and that was Adam's disobedience, and no one else.
The year on the Hebrew calendar is 5785. Which means it has
been 5785 years since creation.
Hello, David!The year on the Hebrew calendar is 5785. Which means it has
been 5785 years since creation. The JewishNew Year is on Rosh Hashanah.
Which falls in early fall. Messianic Rabbis believe Yeshua was born on or very near
to Rosh Hashanah the Jewish NewYear. December 25 is connected to a pagan holiday
which obviously isn't Messiah's time of birth.
Shalom
None of these commentaries find anything in the Scriptures that teach that the earth was created in six days
These concepts are a consequence of interpreting the Bible without a basic understanding of hermeneutics.
I wonder if the authors of these commentaries took notice of the fact that God Himself defined a day as equaling='morning and evening'=ONE day. Gen 1:5,8,13,19,23,31.I have here in my study 28 commentaries on Genesis, most of which are commentaries on the Hebrew text—and some of them are very extensive multi-volume works. None of these commentaries find anything in the Scriptures that teach that the earth was created in six days or about 6,000 years ago. These concepts are a consequence of interpreting the Bible without a basic understanding of hermeneutics.
Your post gives me the impression that you are assuming that Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of actual historical events. Nevertheless, how can that be in this age when information to the contrary is so readily available? The Jewish rabbis continued to believe until the 7th century that Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of actual historical events, but Christians began to observe and write at least as early as the 3rd century that what they could see with their eyes and touch with their hands proved a very different reality.I wonder if the authors of these commentaries took notice of the fact that God Himself defined a day as equaling='morning and evening'=ONE day. Gen 1:5,8,13,19,23,31.
God even gives cardinal numbers (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc.) to these days (to help out the confused 'theologians' writing commentaries).
So, I'm not surer how at least 28 authors of these commentaries missed this, unless their natural bias prevented them from seeing it or they are devoid of God's Spirit, in which case, I'd chuck all 28 volumes
Yes literal. If it's metaphorical, than any one can make anything say anything. Jesus quoted from Genesis 1-11, and took it as literal.Your post gives me the impression that you are assuming that Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of actual historical events. Nevertheless, how can that be in this age when information to the contrary is so readily available?
The Jewish rabbis also rejected Jesus. Not having the Holy Spirit they walk by sight and not by faith.The Jewish rabbis continued to believe until the 7th century that Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of actual historical events, but Christians began to observe and write at least as early as the 3rd century that what they could see with their eyes and touch with their hands proved a very different reality.
Yes. so that we Christians won't compromise our faith under the pressure of scholastic pagan scholarship which contradicts God's word.And, of course, we Christians know that God is not careless or clumsy and that He had a very good reason for giving us Genesis 1-11 in the genre of literature that He did.
Genesis 1-11 is written in a genre of literature that never uses metaphorical language but exclusively literal language. Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of non-historical events—that is, events that never occurred. Indeed, the “windows of heaven” in Gen. 7:11 and 8:2 are to be understood as real windows rather than metaphorical or poetical expressions as young earth creationists claim. The “dome” in Genesis 1:6-8 is to be understood as a real solid dome rather than a poetical expression or mistranslation as young earth creationists claim.Yes literal. If it's metaphorical, than any one can make anything say anything. Jesus quoted from Genesis 1-11, and took it as literal.
Which 'information to the contrary' do you think is readily available?
Believing the Bible and the truth that it teaches is not compromising our faith. Theologically conservative evangelical scholarship is not pagan scholarship, and it never contradicts the word of God—but does sometimes contradict what some Christians mistakenly believe about the Bible.The Jewish rabbis also rejected Jesus. Not having the Holy Spirit they walk by sight and not by faith.
Yes. so that we Christians won't compromise our faith under the pressure of scholastic pagan scholarship which contradicts God's word.
A literal interpretation of “there was evening and there was morning, the first day, which is the correct interpretation, expresses the concept of one day. However, God did NOT create a solid dome in the midst of the waters and therefore, the creation stories in Genesis 1-11 are not an accurate account of historical events—making your point irrelevant to Biblical reality.Now would you mind addressing my point that evening and morning equals one day?
So I guess sin and death never occured?Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of non-historical events—that is, events that never occurred.
So I guess sin and death never occurred?Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of non-historical events—that is, events that never occurred.
...Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of non-historical events—that is, events that never occurred.
...Genesis 1-11 is a literal account of non-historical events—that is, events that never occurred.
I fully believe there was no death until after Adam and Eve sinned. Sin brought forth death, as God stated. It affected all creation, which now groans and travails, waiting for the manifestation of the sons of God.