DeafPosttrib: //Isn't Jesus, OUR Messiah?//
Yes.
Jumped to conclusion #1a and #1b:
//Are you now telling me that the Son of God shall be turned
into darkness and the Church into blood? I thought that according
to dispensational error the Church had been raptured out.//
Me4Him trying to say "no":
//Obviously, you haven't read all the charts and posting.
//The church is rapture before the trib begins, Jesus has made
"Atonement" for the church is "HIS FLESH", (By his stripes)
however Israel will make "ATONEMENT" with Stripes in their
"FLESH", (being killed), this is the "Chastisement of God"
for rejecting Jesus, and the "ROD" God uses to inflict these
"STRIPES" is the AC.
//Since Jesus has already made atonement for the Church,
it will "LITERALLY, PASSOVER" the trib by the rapture.//
Jumped to conclusion #2a, #2b, and #2c:
//So you are saying that the Jews will make atonement
for their own sins? Now where in Scripture does
it teach that man can atone for his sins? If that be
true why was it necessary that Jesus Christ, God the Son
die on a Roman cross?
The answers are 2a: NO
3a: nowhere
3b: your false premesis makes the questions foolish.
Jumped to conclusion #3:
//[I can see it now. We will have a bunch of Jewish
flagellants running around flailing themselves
on the back with chains and stuff. They do that in some
countries now you know. In fact I saw some Muslims
doing that on TV]//
Strange image you lept to, nothing was said anthing about self
flagellation???
Somebody is jumping from strange conclusions to strange conclusion.
I know i'm not supposed to even consider the motive for doing such
strange things, but it sure looks a lot like Trolling to me.
Why else would a person misconstrue a Me4Hm's answer to
Jumped to conclusion #1.
Maybe i need to each Brother Me4Him to answer in kind
Jumped to conclusion #1a and #1b:
//Are you now telling me that the Son of God shall be turned
into darkness and the Church into blood?//
Suggested answer:
SIMILE - n. - 1. a figure of speach in which two unlike
things are explicitly compared
example: "she is like a rose"
METAPHOR - n. - a figure of speach in which two unlike
things are inxplicitly compared
example: "she is a rose
Me4Him:
//Israel will make "ATONEMENT" with Stripes in their "FLESH", (being killed)
Boycotted person:
//No I ask both you and Me4Him, are you saying that the Jews
cam make atinement for their sins? All you have to do
is give a simple Yes or No.//
Your question is invalid. The question is not adequately described
by your statement. Your 'lawyer question' cannot be answered by
a simple yes or no. What Me4Him means by 'atonement' may not mean
what i mean by 'atonement'. I don't see how the statement of Me4Him
can be understood outside the Dispensational frame of reference.