• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Hate And Haters

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The fact remains that the majority of SP justices that supported R vs. Wade were appointed by Republicans. Therefore it was a Republican decision. You can try to talk around that b ut that's the historical truth.

David Souter was actually Gorge HW Bush's appointment. You voted for GHWB. I didn't.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And even hypocrites could gain forgiveness if they repented and believe. But this is true of all of us. We all have to repent.

But if you support murder, and refuse to repent, how can you call yourself a follower of Christ? Do you not believe in repentance?
How many times do I have to state my position on abortion? Al;so, I do not support gay marriage because I believe that marriage between a man and a woman and sacred in His sight. The law of the land is to not discriminate and the government can perform a civil union. I don't equate that with marriage. Why do you support murdering hundreds of thousands of Americans by taking away their health insurance and the murder of combatants and civilians in meaningless wars of aggression? The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq actually made terrorism worse by making it easy for extremists to attract more terrorists who hate America.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But that's not what you said, was it? What you first said was that it was Republicans that formed the majority on RvW (wrong), and that Republicans were the abortion party (wrong) - that award goes to the Democrat Party, follow the PP trail.

Ancient history, kind of like they were the slavery party - DRED SCOTT was a DEMOCRAT decision, they are still for slavery! You can try to talk around that but that's the historical truth

1. Marshall, White and Douglas were Democrats appoints by Democratic presidents.

2. Chief Justice Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Stewart, and Blackman were Republicans appointed by Republican presidents.

3. Brennan was a Democrat appointed by a Republican president for political reasons.

4. The vote was 7 in favor and 2 (White-R and Rehnquist-D).

5. Even though Brennen was a Democrat it was Eisenhower’s decision that put him on the court because Presidential advisers thought the appointment of a Roman Catholic Democrat from the Northeast would woo critical voters in the upcoming re-election campaign for Eisenhower, a Republican.[10] Therefore, I would conclude that his vote was due to a decision by a Republican and therefore his vote should be counted as a Republican vote. Besides that, only one Republican voted against Roe vs. Wade. Therefore it was clearly a Republican decision to bring about legal abortion in the U.S.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How many times do I have to state my position on abortion? Al;so, I do not support gay marriage because I believe that marriage between a man and a woman and sacred in His sight. The law of the land is to not discriminate and the government can perform a civil union. I don't equate that with marriage. Why do you support murdering hundreds of thousands of Americans by taking away their health insurance and the murder of combatants and civilians in meaningless wars of aggression? The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq actually made terrorism worse by making it easy for extremists to attract more terrorists who hate America.

Still refusing to answer how you can support Jimmy Carter.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I answered your question about abortion yesterday. Do you support murder by taking away health care from the needy? I know 2 deserving people (both actually former millionaires who have had prolonged bouts with cancer) who would have died if Obamacare hadn't passed. Do you support murdering retirees who depend on Medicare. The GOP does. Do you support murdering our "enemies and non-combatants in meaningless wars like Viet Nam, Afghanistan and Iraq?

By your reasoning, hundred of millions of people throughout history-- including Jesus himself-- are murderers because they did nothing to begin or sustain socialist healthcare. As to the war efforts you mentioned, there is a lot of value in killing communists and radical muzzlumms, by Revelation 18:6 as well as the logic of kill or be killed.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
By your reasoning, hundred of millions of people throughout history-- including Jesus himself-- are murderers because they did nothing to begin or sustain socialist healthcare.

Pretty sure he said "take away health insurance" and not "begin" or "sustain" it. Yep. Twice.





Sent from my Moto Droid Turbo.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Who took it away and how? I felt that mine was 'taken away' for this year when I discovered my premiums were to be 3 times as much as for last year, thanx to the BO. So I just scrapped the company plan and searched and found one with the premiums close to the same as for the year before. Tell me who has been forbidden to get their own health insurance.
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Therefore, I would conclude that his vote was due to a decision by a Republican and therefore his vote should be counted as a Republican vote. Besides that, only one Republican voted against Roe vs. Wade. Therefore it was clearly a Republican decision to bring about legal abortion in the U.S.

Your conclusion, last sentence, was inevitably rationalized. A Democrat appointee by a Republican does not make the appointee a Republican, but whatever. Even if you were right and you're not, still, what is your argument? That a Republican appointed a Democrat sixty years ago and therefore, abortion was a Republican concept? So now nobody should be a Republican because they caused abortion and that it's okay to be a Democrat thereofre?

Actually, RvW just nationalized what some of the LIBERAL states were already doing at the time - you can be a Democrat if you wish, but if you are against abortion, you are against the beliefs of 99%+ of your fellow party members.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your conclusion, last sentence, was inevitably rationalized. A Democrat appointee by a Republican does not make the appointee a Republican, but whatever. Even if you were right and you're not, still, what is your argument? That a Republican appointed a Democrat sixty years ago and therefore, abortion was a Republican concept? So now nobody should be a Republican because they caused abortion and that it's okay to be a Democrat thereofre?

Actually, RvW just nationalized what some of the LIBERAL states were already doing at the time - you can be a Democrat if you wish, but if you are against abortion, you are against the beliefs of 99%+ of your fellow party members.
Yes, I'm making the point that the Republicans were responsible for making abortion legal in the U.S. Your point about 60 years ago (actually about 50) reinforces my statement that the republican Party hasn't done anything about their mistake for 50 years because they don't want to change it. It hol;ds on to right wing evangelical Christians' votes. Otherwise don't you think SOMETHING would have been done in 50 years? BTW, I really don't identify with the Democratic Party in the sense that you do with the Republican Party. I'd rather just be called a Christian who votes his conscience. (I've voted for the person who I believe is the best qualified from both parties). Have youn ever voted for a Democrat? I doubt it.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Don't you know that in the liberal/non conservative mindset any disagreement equals hate. That has been true for decades now and since now so many people here are openly supporting a non conservative president (per Carpo) it makes sense to see the liberal/non conservative idea take root here.

I figure the hate card will go well with the collection of racist cards I collected during the Obama administration.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Any statement which characterizes a large group of people whether they have the same race, religion or political philosophy as being the same is inherently discriminatory an anti-Christian.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Credible evidence please.
How about - He does not hate these groups of people. He is doing his job to protect the nation from evil no matter the form or the cunning it takes.
All of humanity is capable of extreme evil.

HankD
You don't accept a video of him saying that in his own words? What do you count as credible, quotes from Breitbart?"
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, there are many republicans that are not Christians also. But if you're pro abortion and pro gay marriage? I think it's at least fair to doubt it. I'm not going to say point blank, you're not a Christian, but I do wonder how a Christian can support things like that.
Read my posts. I provided my position on abortion and have said nothing about gay rights.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Still refusing to answer how you can support Jimmy Carter.
Do you support murder by taking away healthcare from the needy and by murdering people in useless wars of aggression? jimmy Carter is a good, Godly man. But you worship the disciple of the devil, Trump, so youi can't recognize that.
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Still refusing to answer how you can support Jimmy Carter.

don't hold your breath, Jimmuh is a Democrat, that's why. But Trump is the epitome of evil and there is no such video. He's on ignore, troll fatigue.
 
Top