• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Have/would you take the Covid vaccine? PT 2

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thanks for thinking of me but I will not give money to these misinformation for profit merchants by clicking on their links. If you have a specific question I can try to look it up for you to see if there is any truth. Or you can learn to fact check things yourself.

If you havent clicked on the link to see the info how han you know its misinformation (a propagandist term).? Fact is you cant more reason why you cant be taken seriously.
 

Stratton7

Member
Thanks for thinking of me but I will not give money to these misinformation for profit merchants by clicking on their links. If you have a specific question I can try to look it up for you to see if there is any truth. Or you can learn to fact check things yourself.
I could be wrong as I’m not in your mind to know your intentions, but this comment does seem like a cop out in avoidance of information you may disagree with. If willing, I’d be interested in your responses to these links so far.
 

Gold Dragon

Well-Known Member
Post what you think the problem is on here in words and I can address the misinformation. Ask a question. Put names of the people making the claims and what their claims are.

I’m not clicking on that trash.
 

Gold Dragon

Well-Known Member

I’m assuming it has something to do with his HCQ paper that he was the author for that he published in his own journal with nothing resembling legitimate peer review?


Melbourne doctors under review for promoting discredited Covid treatment

Trust the experts, we are told. Believe the science. But what happens when it is a group of eminent doctors who are behind the misinformation – and they back their claims with a superficially convincing bevy of peer-reviewed academic journal articles?

....

The key reference providing support to this assertion is this article, the lead author of which is Dr Peter McCullough, vice-chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Centre in Dallas, Texas. Zelenko is one of his 56 co-authors.

The article should be taken seriously, says Mathieson, because it is “peer reviewed”. The evidence is “now virtually beyond dispute,” he says.

But a check of the credentials of the journal in which it appeared – Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine – reveals that McCullough himself is the editor-in-chief of the journal in which he has published.

On top of that, the peer review process was astonishingly quick. The paper was submitted on 28 November, accepted after revisions on 15 December and published just a fortnight later.

Baylor Scott and White Health, which runs the medical centre where McCullough holds his position, told me that the article “does not reflect the views of Baylor Scott and White Health”.
 

Gold Dragon

Well-Known Member

I’ve already addressed Shawn Skelton in another thread. This is the same thing. Another single case of something that may or may not have been due to the vaccine out of millions that did not have anything like it. These cases get reported to VAERS if she really did get the vaccine and they are investigated for any causal links or patterns.

PolitiFact - The ‘shaking’ COVID-19 vaccine side-effect videos and what we know about them

 

Gold Dragon

Well-Known Member
There is this cool new website called Google that lets you search this totally rad thing called the World Wide Web. Check it out. It might come in handy with all this misinformation you are reading.
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Top