“...assumed it must have come from there.”
They’re still calling it a name for where they believe it to have come from.
They don't like the French, so they made the assumption that bad stuff comes from France.
It’s not labeling anyone in a derogatory way or a personal attack.
Sure it is.
If you want to use something different, by all means.
Let's call it the "Trump virus," since it occurred when he was President, he claimed it would go away, "like a miracle," and we have 500,000 dead on his watch.
And as a Christian, you should know the left is not more respectful as you’ve said.
Frankly, I have found them MUCH more respectful than many people in "conservative" religious circles here or in person.
They want to remove God. Plain and simple.
That's quite a foolish accusation. I would love to hear your reasoning that led you to make that statement, but that would be off-topic.
Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years,
Dr. Mike Yeadon..."
You can tell that everything that comes past this introduction is suspect, since Mike Yeadon was NOT the "Chief Science Officer for Pfizer" (that's actually
Mikael Dolsten), although he did work for the UK-based allergy and respiratory unit of the firm that shut down in 2011. He has no experience in infectious disease or vaccines.
This stuff is EASY to check, if you actually want to know what it true.
[the fraudulent scientist, Dr. Mike Yeadon allegedly] says:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.”
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects,”
That's rubbish.
If the pandemic is over, why is it raging in populations that are not vaccinated?
Just thought this was interesting. Here’s the link if anyone wants to see more about what they believe may happen.
You actually didn't create a link. I had to chase down that nonsense myself. It is hosted on a fringe website, and there's not much there to begin with, just a reference back to a study that was allegedly done in the 1960s on animals. It's not the 1960s and we know a lot more about the science than we did then, so even that reference is irrelevant.
*I am not endorsing this info or agreeing or disagreeing w/ it. It just caught my eye when doing research.*
Do you think you can actually do legitimate research if you don't check out the basics (Mike Yeadon's former position) or have the medical/science knowledge necessary to separate the truth from propaganda?
I know quite a bit about medicine for a layman, but I reach out to real experts when I want to check things out. My brother is a research chemist (organic chemistry) for medical research and stays on the cutting edge of drugs and treatment, so I reach out to him about some of these things. I also have friends and family that are doctors and nurses, and I check in with them as well.
Do you have those resources?