SINCE YOU ASKED <G>
>So are you saying you reject Christianity?
NO! I don't think orthodox Christianity was what Jesus had in mind.
>Or that you remain agnostic about whether we can actually know truth?
We can't be sure we know the truth as long as we "see through a glass, darkly." And could we understand it if we could see it clearly? I don't know. My pastor says God talks to us in baby talk because that is all we can understand.
>>The wording of the thread title and posts illustrates the ambiguity in the Bible and the gnostic characteristic of Christianity e.g. several conflicting words to define one spiritual state and arguments over what the words mean.
>Can you please further explain in clear words and specifics, if possible, what you are stressing in your said post,
"Believe in," "invite Jesus," "Be born again," regeneration," "sanctification," "being save," "following Jesus," "repenting," "being elect" are all different ways of describing the same end result.
One characteristic of gnosticism is having levels of understanding like the Masonic "degrees." Most of you are to polite, to civilized, to plainly say that anyone who disagrees with you is going to hell, but clear most believe that anyone who disagrees has a lower level of understanding thus is less sanctified, less holy.
You all quote scripture and use theological words as if everything is clear and understood by every other person. The big technical words are not a problem. Anyone can grab a dictionary or use wiki. When someone asks, "Do you mean A or B?" that is a an honest question. When someone asks a question that would be easier to look up they are trying to start some kind of trouble.
Evangelical Protestants use some popular verses as a gnostic password. The meaning is assumed, never discussed, and I don't know what it "really" means. The problem is the small words. For example, "Greater is he who is in you than he who is in the world." It should be obvious that this sentence has two meanings for "in."
I like listening to Catholic Radio (except for the "Hail Marys") because they have very qualified personnel who speak in clear standard English, not "insider" jargon.
A friend (85 years old) gave me a book written by his old friend whom he says is the most intelligent person he has known. I turned a few pages and it was obvious the author was a pharisee. First hint, all the pronouns for Jesus or God are capitalized. That is NOT standard English or standard theological practice. Not even the KJV does that! Second, it is clear he thinks the moral problems in the US would be solved by indoctrinating the young people with the Ten Commandments. Many Christians are pharisees without realizing it.