While it's a "sound calvinist interpretation" it's not a sound biblical interpretation.I would always point people to Gill if they want a sound Calvinist interpretation of a Scripture verse.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
While it's a "sound calvinist interpretation" it's not a sound biblical interpretation.I would always point people to Gill if they want a sound Calvinist interpretation of a Scripture verse.
webdog said:While it's a "sound calvinist interpretation" it's not a sound biblical interpretation.
Oh, there is nothing wrong with seeking the teaching of others, but they do not know everything. If they did we could just throw away our Bibles and read the works of Calvin or Spurgeon or whoever. No matter how we revere teachers of the word, they are human and everything they teach should be compared to scripture and sometimes it will line up and sometimes it won't. Mormons are Mormons because they put their faith in the works of Joseph Smith instead of the truth of God's word. If I lived on a deserted island with only a Bible to read, I could still know the truth in His word because He is with me and in me. He is theRippon said:Amy , you are wrong . The following was intended chiefly for preachers , but has application to laymen ( laypeople ) as well . It's from the pen of Charles Spurgeon .
In order to expound the Scriptures , and as an aid to your pulpit studies , you will need to be familiar with the commentators : a glorious army , let me tell you , whose aquaintance will be your delight and profit . Of course , you are not such wiseacres to think or say that you can expound Scripture without assistance from the works of divines and learned men who have labored before you in the field of exposition . If you are of that opinion , pray remain so , for you are not worth the trouble of conversion , and like a little coterie who think with you , would resent the attempt as an insult to your infallibility . It seems odd , that certain men who talk so much of what the Holy Spirit reveals to themselves , should think so little of what He has revealed to others .
What's the hang-up with this verse?Amy.G said:Are you serious? Why would anyone who has the indwelling of God Himself need to consult any human commentator?
What is the typical understanding of John 3:16? How about just believe what it says? For God so loved the WORLD. The WORLD..meaning PEOPLE, not the 3rd rock from the sun.
Before you say that God doesn't love the world, but only the elect, let me remind you that the same God commands US to love our enemies. We are to love the WORLD and take the gospel to them. Taking the gospel to the world is an act of LOVE. Will the whole world accept the gospel? No. But, we are to love them anyway. Not love their ways, but love them as God's creation.
For while we were YET sinners, Christ died for us. While we were still nasty, disgusting God rejecters (part of the world), Christ gave His perfect, sinless life for us that we might be saved.
I pesonally don't have any hangups with John 3:16.Isaiah40:28 said:What's the hang-up with this verse?
It simply says that to show God's love for mankind He sent His Son.
And those who believe in Jesus will not die, but will have eternal life.
No one needs to insert "the elect" into the verse, nor "free will" to make this verse work for any theological system.
It just sums up the message of the gospel.
I don't base my Calvinistic beliefs on this verse.
my 2 cents.
It's the Calvinists that insist Christ didn't die for the world, just the elect.
When did I say that?johnp. said:Amy.G. Your debt is paid not because you accepted salvation but because Jesus paid it for you.
john.
Did Jesus taste death for all men, or not johnp? You say He didn't...the author of Hebrews says He did. Who do I believe?johnp. said:I'll spell it out for you webdog. If Christ died for the sins of the every man ever born then every man ever born has had his sins forgiven him as you well know.Doesn't take any Pelagianism on our part.
Was our debt of sin paid for by Christ or not? If it was then we owe God nothing because the debt has been discharged. Once a debt has been cancelled it has been cancelled. Did Jesus cancel the debt for us or not webdog? What charge can be brought against those that have their sins atoned for? Jesus died for my sins because He loved me and He gave Himself for me, Gal 2:20.
Your debt is paid not because you accepted salvation but because Jesus paid it for you.
By the way, I know what I owe God.
My answer.
john.
John, don't you suppose that Jesus knew the difference between "the world" and "the elect"?
John, don't you suppose that Jesus knew the difference between "the world" and "the elect"?
Jesus said "for God so loved the world"... (John 3:16)
When He said "God so loved the world" that's what He meant.
Did Jesus taste death for all men, or not johnp? You say He didn't...the author of Hebrews says He did. Who do I believe?
Who do I believe?
Learn what "atonement" means and come back, johnp, otherwise conversation with you is fruitless.