RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
Not so long ago, the universe was considered eternal by many non-Christian scientists. What really raised their hackles was the discovery that the universe is expanding. Why? Because it implies a beginning, suggesting that the Bible was right all along: ”In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”There is still not a clear question. Which age? The one in the Bible or the one scientist think? Neither have much importance whatsoever. Some have argued that humanism has taken over the church and that if there is only nature, how did humans come to believe in a God to begin with? So the Bible was set aside to figure out where God came from. In the meantime science figured out an age for the earth and universe. Then when the church found out, they lost both God and God's Word. It has been a fight to get back to any original position. The church itself, in modern terms, had to be told by an outsider that the Bible did indeed declare God was transcendent, and outside of creation itself. Thus God is not a product of creation. Why does anyone want to know why God did what God did? If God is outside of creation, and created the world as finite, the only importance is that God is about to shake things up and turn the world upside down again. That is why time and dates are important to the church. The world only does their research as environmental conditions direct the course of human life. Then folks on all sides pass the time debating about the facts.
They were desperate to come up with an explanation that avoided a beginning. Every attempt has failed. Now they postulate, metaphysically not scientifically mind you, an eternal Multiverse.
If instead of focusing on the age of the earth, Christians apologists would focus on the fact of the beginning and the metaphysical cop-out of a multiverse, perhaps they would make more headway in getting a hearing.