I've never sat down with it and actually compared it to the KJV.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am a KJBO Independent Fundamental Dispesationlist Baptist
- Thread starter KJB1611reader
- Start date
I've never sat down with it and actually compared it to the KJV.
37818
Well-Known Member
I advocate using the KJV. But I can't be a KJVO for reasons.
A side KJV question.
What are the two primary differences between 1 John 5:7 KJV1611 and KJV? To answer simply quote the KJV1611. Not a major issue. But there is a difference.
3 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem?
5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
Do you hold to those things, or have you began to find pos
Do you hold to those things, or have you began to find positions that are more biblical?
KJB1611reader
Member
KJB1611reader
Member
Yes.
KJB1611reader
Member
I don't know much of Scofield but I believe dispensationlism according to Robert Breaker, Gene Kim and Roy Bell.
I am not familiar with those men. are you a new Christian? is this the only teaching you have considered so far? have you compared it to other views?
Baptizo
Active Member
I used to follow these guys too. Their mentor was Peter Ruckman, who was wrong about so many things, like saying the book of James is only applicable to Jews during the millennium.
I am not a Kjvo, nor holding to Scofieldism
Glad you are not Kjvo, what reasons keep you from being that though?
Baptizo
Active Member
Scofield has influenced the majority of Evangelical’s eschatology.
Why are you holding to such a view then?
Its off the very same textual sources used by the 1611 Translators
Peter Ruckman pretty much was clueless to textual criticism and what the Kjv really was, for IF he had actually agreed with the 1611 translators themselves, would not have been KJVO
37818
Well-Known Member
Cases where the KJB translation is inadequate.
Other explanations are needed beyond it's English text, both in the Old and New Testaments.
I know, as when first came over into Baptist circles, had my old scofield and ryrie study bibles to make sure was a "good dispy" but now came over to more of A Dr Macarthur view, as being one holding to Calvinism salvation, and premil eschatology as he does, just without a pretrib rapture
So your view would be while its best translation , not perfect?
Dost thou always speak as if thou hadst just arrived out of the Shakespearean era?
I am not bothered by it. I have had the most miserable of experiences with autocorrect even trying to imitate thy high and lofty Shakespearean grammar.
Not trying to pick a fight. I have met people who only speak this way. I just want to know if you do also.
37818
Well-Known Member
He was wrong, not clueless.