• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

I am a KJBO Independent Fundamental Dispesationlist Baptist

Baptizo

Active Member
Peter Ruckman pretty much was clueless to textual criticism and what the Kjv really was, for IF he had actually agreed with the 1611 translators themselves, would not have been KJVO

He was just a crazy person, like saying that women will get 33 year old male bodies at the rapture.
 

Baptizo

Active Member
Repenting is a change of mind.

Repenting of sins to be saved is a false gospel.

Seems like you’ve bought into the heresy of “easy believism,” which is common among the Ruckman school of thought. Yes, you change your mind from unbelief to belief, but that’s not the end of the story. If your belief is genuine, you receive the Holy Spirit and it is supposed to convict you to stop sinning. If you’re not being convicted of sin, then you don’t have the Holy Spirit.

Hebrews 12:8 - But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Now that may not matter to you if you follow guys like Kim and Breaker, who teach that the book of Hebrews is only applicable to Jews during Christ’s millennial reign.
 
Last edited:
Seems like you’ve bought into the heresy of “easy believism,” which is common among the Ruckman school of thought. Yes, you change your mind from unbelief to belief, but that’s not the end of the story. If your belief is genuine, you receive the Holy Spirit and it is supposed to convict you to stop sinning. If you’re not being convicted of sin, then you don’t have the Holy Spirit.

Hebrews 12:8 - But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Now that may not matter to you if you follow guys like Kim and Breaker, who teach that the book of Hebrews is only applicable to Jews during Christ’s millennial reign.
Actually, they say the salvation portion isn't but we can still get wisdom from there. Same idea with Old Testament.

So, no fruits, no saved?
 
I advocate using the KJV. But I can't be a KJVO for reasons.

A side KJV question.
What are the two primary differences between 1 John 5:7 KJV1611 and KJV? To answer simply quote the KJV1611. Not a major issue. But there is a difference.
There are issues in 1611.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I believe Bible (KJB) is perfect.

I believe in Dispensationalism.

I believe in the blood, the blood and the blessed hope.

I believe in the Godhead (Trinity.)
I agree, except perhaps in Dispensationalism (I believe there are covenants and dispensations, but have not found it necessary to be dogmatic about it).

The KJV is God's Word (as is the NASB, the NIV, and the ESV...to name a few more translations.
Along with you I'd admonish any Christian who denounces God's Word, regardless of translation.

I also believe in the Godhead and the hope we have in Christ.
 

Baptizo

Active Member
That's not an error, look at the semicolon

2 Kings 8:26 - Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.

2 Chronicles 22:2 - Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.

Ahaziah's father was 40 years old when he died, so it is impossible that Ahaziah was 2 years older than him when he took over. Also, there are ancient Arabic and Syriac manuscripts that have both accounts reading as 22. It is so obvious that it was a scribal error that made its way into the translation. And there is no such thing as a semicolon in the original languages, so that doesn't proves anything.
 
2 Kings 8:26 - Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.

2 Chronicles 22:2 - Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.

Ahaziah's father was 40 years old when he died, so it is impossible that Ahaziah was 2 years older than him when he took over. Also, there are ancient Arabic and Syriac manuscripts that have both accounts reading as 22. It is so obvious that it was a scribal error that made its way into the translation. And there is no such thing as a semicolon in the original languages, so that doesn't proves anything.
No, he started co-reigning at 22.
 

Baptizo

Active Member
The semicolon, as I said.

Stop doubting God's words. There are plenty of explainations online.

Yes, there are plenty of ways to make a square object fit into a round hold. If you're going to practice sola scriptura, you can't rely on outside sources or mere speculation. The modern translations have fixed this discrepancy and this one example is what lead me out of the KJVO movement.
 
Last edited:
Top