Would stand by clueless, based what his own so called study notes in his own study bibleHe was wrong, not clueless.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Would stand by clueless, based what his own so called study notes in his own study bibleHe was wrong, not clueless.
Yes. In it's way. Where the TR is mostly correct versus the CTSo your view would be while its best translation , not perfect?
How about MT/Bzt as many see them superior to either TR/CT?Yes. In it's way. Where the TR is mostly correct versus the CT
Yes. But it is still not cut and dry. It is a Bzyantine priority.How about MT/Bzt as many see them superior to either TR/CT?
Yes. But it is still not cut and dry. It is a Bzyantine priority.
Check out:
So your view would be while its best translation , not perfect?
Peter Ruckman pretty much was clueless to textual criticism and what the Kjv really was, for IF he had actually agreed with the 1611 translators themselves, would not have been KJVO
Repenting is a change of mind.
Repenting of sins to be saved is a false gospel.
Actually, they say the salvation portion isn't but we can still get wisdom from there. Same idea with Old Testament.Seems like you’ve bought into the heresy of “easy believism,” which is common among the Ruckman school of thought. Yes, you change your mind from unbelief to belief, but that’s not the end of the story. If your belief is genuine, you receive the Holy Spirit and it is supposed to convict you to stop sinning. If you’re not being convicted of sin, then you don’t have the Holy Spirit.
Hebrews 12:8 - But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
Now that may not matter to you if you follow guys like Kim and Breaker, who teach that the book of Hebrews is only applicable to Jews during Christ’s millennial reign.
There are issues in 1611.I advocate using the KJV. But I can't be a KJVO for reasons.
A side KJV question.
What are the two primary differences between 1 John 5:7 KJV1611 and KJV? To answer simply quote the KJV1611. Not a major issue. But there is a difference.
That's not an error, look at the semicolonI used to be KJVO until I discovered verses where scribal errors were carried over into the translation, such as the age discrepancy of King Ahaziah.
Actually, they say the salvation portion isn't but we can still get wisdom from there. Same idea with Old Testament.
So, no fruits, no saved?
I agree, except perhaps in Dispensationalism (I believe there are covenants and dispensations, but have not found it necessary to be dogmatic about it).I believe Bible (KJB) is perfect.
I believe in Dispensationalism.
I believe in the blood, the blood and the blessed hope.
I believe in the Godhead (Trinity.)
That's not an error, look at the semicolon
No, he started co-reigning at 22.2 Kings 8:26 - Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
2 Chronicles 22:2 - Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
Ahaziah's father was 40 years old when he died, so it is impossible that Ahaziah was 2 years older than him when he took over. Also, there are ancient Arabic and Syriac manuscripts that have both accounts reading as 22. It is so obvious that it was a scribal error that made its way into the translation. And there is no such thing as a semicolon in the original languages, so that doesn't proves anything.
No, he started co-reigning at 22.
The semicolon, as I said.Where in the text does it say that he co-reigned?
I got this info from a man named Matthew from bibleprotector. May email him and get a better response.Where in the text does it say that he co-reigned?
The semicolon, as I said.
Stop doubting God's words. There are plenty of explainations online.
I got this info from a man named Matthew from bibleprotector. May email him and get a better response.