1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

I have two questions for KJVOist.

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by David J, May 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Welcome Phatcat,

    None of your Scriptures teach or even infer KJVOism. The point continues to be made that we wait for one Scripture that teaches that the KJV is the only inspired english Bible. Especially since the Bible was already written in English prior to 1611. If you prefer the KJV, great, but don't come here with a man based religious faith in KJVOism and call it biblical. If it were biblical you could show us in the Bible.

    Bro Tony

    BTW--you claim to use the AV1611 KJB--yet you don't even quote from it when you refer to the Scripture, but to a revision of the 1611. :rolleyes:
     
  2. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    We need CSI to get the Kind of evidence that you want. Paul said as a looking glass darkly. not an "Electron Micrscope" Clearly. When we all get to heave what a day of rejoicing that will be! when we All see Jesus we will all Shout the "VICTORY"! The Isms belong with the False Doctorines! not the proven Heritage of the AV 1611! Some body say Amen! Stick with tradition and stay away from the teachings of man,(TCassidy,Robycop3, ransom, desaderio demonia,etc...) all of you I have "Marked" with a Big Sharpie! As the Word tells me to do!
     
  3. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    William,

    Is this an attack on their salvation or their walk in the Lord? If so you have just violated the BB rules that you agreed to abide by. I guess you are having trouble letting your "yeah be your Yeah"

    Bro Tony
     
  4. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still waiting for one example of my NKJV changing any doctrine found in the KJV or the manuscripts.

    Bro Tony
     
  5. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is like saying "Show me the truth about someone going to hell without Jesus, but I don't want a bunch of Scriptures concerning sin because that can be applied to any thing you do."

    Since I cannot lead anyone to the Lord who does not believe the Scriptures given, then I cannot show someone the truth about the KJB who does not believe the Scriptures given.

    It'll just have to be the Holy Spirit, just like it was for me, or else nothing.

    Psalm 12:6-7 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
    Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.


    How many times does God have to say it before it's true?

    1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

    Confusion (example):
    Isaiah 14:12 KJB- Lucifer (referring to Satan)
    Isaiah 14:12 NIV(and most MVs)- morning star (which is another name for Jesus)
    II Corinthians 2:15 KJB- are saved (finished work)
    II Corinthians 2:15 NIV (and most MVs)- are being saved (works)
    So which is it? Are you saved or being saved? If being, then how far along are you? 50%, 75%, 99%? How much before you can "get in"?

    No, my Bible, the Holy Bible AV1611 KJB (yes, with SPELLING and grammer NOT DOCTRINAL revisions through 1769) says that I am SAVED! And by the Morning Star Jesus Christ, not Lucifer.

    Those with baked clay hearts will not even care about this.

    Good day. [​IMG]
    </font>[/QUOTE]Amen I just wish I could get the entire AV 1611 with Apocrypha and all we are loosing that old time religion and thats all I want, not this new Stuff,this "feel good" stuff lets "hug a tree" stuff! All the MV's readers do is Grumble on a Mon. on a Tue. on a Wed.Grumble on a Thur too, .,Grumble on a Friday,Saturday,Sunday Grumble All the week thru!
     
  6. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    KJVOism is not God's Word the KJB IS Gods Word!
     
  7. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still waiting for one example of my NKJV changing any doctrine found in the KJV or the manuscripts.

    Bro Tony
    </font>[/QUOTE]2 Timohty 2:15
     
  8. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    You forget one sentence what most MVOists always SAID: "The KJV has 'ERRORS'." That is why these lax translators produced their "NEW" Bibles -- Modern Versions! When they produced them, this is very obvious to show that they REJECTED the KJV, but they always DENIED that they "reject" the KJV. If they did NOT reject the KJV, they would NOT produce modern versions. Please do not forget that the Roman Catholic system LOVES modern versions AGASINST the KJV.
     
  9. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    PhatCat, excellent comment! I second that. Amen!!! [​IMG]
     
  10. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    William,

    Once again no answer the NKJV does not change any doctrines in 2 Timothy 2: 15 simply because you dont like "be diligent" rather than "study". Again, no doctrine changed.

    Secondly, I agree the KJV or KJB if you prefer is the Word of God, I never said different. Try reading what I said a little closer, that way you won't mis-quote me. I said that KJVOism is not a biblical teaching and that believing in KJVOism is not biblical faith. BTW--not only is the KJV the Word of God, but so is the NKJV, NIV, NASB, ESV...

    Bro Tony
     
  11. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    William,

    Is this an attack on their salvation or their walk in the Lord? If so you have just violated the BB rules that you agreed to abide by. I guess you are having trouble letting your
    Bro Tony
    </font>[/QUOTE]Well they are men and they are teaching False Doctorines if they are teching from [attacks on named Modern Versions removed] and the new Gender friedly what ever it is! As far my
    "yeah be your Yeah" there are also nays and those folks are a big Nay in My book! They have said things that are completly un true and have tried to Slander my good name! Read the post!It Dosent matter what I beleive in the scriptures are Above us All but to try and get some one to beleive you by spreading Falsehoods are a complete disgrace! The AV 1611 is the proof that you asked for read and learn from it all you need is the WORD!

    [William you have been warned again and again about slandering Bibles. You have also been warned about questioning the salvation of those who don't believe you unbiblical doctrine. This will NOT be tolerated and if you insist on continuing you will not be allowed to continue to post. These are BB RULES, not mine and if you cannot abide by the owner of the BB's rules then you will not be allowed to post on HIS board. It is simple as that. You had better get with the program or there will be no more program for you. It is getting tired of editing your rule-breaking.]

    [ May 11, 2006, 12:09 AM: Message edited by: Phillip ]
     
  12. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Askjo,

    Don't change what I said, re-read it and respond. Again, in two years here no one has ever stated that the KJV is not God's Word, but several times, including you, the KJVOist have slandered the MV's by stating they were not God's Word.

    Bro Tony
     
  13. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    There is no such verse.
     
  14. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please tell me your not actually serious. [​IMG]
    False the Catholics I know would use a 1611 over the NIV because the 1611 would contain the apocrypha from which they get many of thier false teachings.
     
  15. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    God calls slander and libel a lie. He calls those who do such things a liar.
     
  16. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    NKJ 2 Timothy 2:15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

    We are not to be diligent to present ourself approved, but rather Study to show ourself approved unto God. The NKJV implies there is something man can do outside of studying the Word to please God by changing the word 'study' to 'be diligent'. One can be diligent in many things.


    But unto Cain and his sacrifice, God had not respect.
     
  17. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    DeclareHim,

    Now don't come in here and confuse Askjo with facts. :eek: :D

    Bro Tony
     
  18. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no such verse. </font>[/QUOTE]Sorry 2 Timothy 2 :15 the Only place the Bible tells us to "Study to show thyself approved unto God a Workman that needeth not to be ashamed rightly deviding the word of truth"
     
  19. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen
     
  20. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is like saying "Show me the truth about someone going to hell without Jesus, but I don't want a bunch of Scriptures concerning sin because that can be applied to any thing you do."</font>[/QUOTE] No it isn't. The scriptures explicitly teach that the lost will go to hell. It names the place. Describes it. And gives the characteristics of one who will go there.

    A skeptic can deny that it is true... but to deny that the Bible teaches that the lost go to hell because of sin is to deny the meanings of words.

    The Bible doesn't say nor imply anywhere that the KJV is perfectly worded.

    False argument. We believe the scriptures given. We simply do not believe the KJVO conjecture, expansion,... the writing between the lines if you will... that says that these scriptures apply to the KJV alone.

    KJVOnlyism is not based in scripture. To claim that the Holy Spirit gave you a truth not found in scripture is to claim latter day revelation... that you are the object of direct divine inspiration.

    Once... And nowhere does He say what KJVO's believe.

    Without even addressing the fallacies of this argument that have been demonstrated repeatedly... note that you say "most MVs yet you condemn all.
    Both and then some. I have been redeemed. I am being sanctified. I will be glorified.

    All three are aspects of salvation.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...