Welcome Phatcat,
None of your Scriptures teach or even infer KJVOism. The point continues to be made that we wait for one Scripture that teaches that the KJV is the only inspired english Bible. Especially since the Bible was already written in English prior to 1611. If you prefer the KJV, great, but don't come here with a man based religious faith in KJVOism and call it biblical. If it were biblical you could show us in the Bible.
Bro Tony
BTW--you claim to use the AV1611 KJB--yet you don't even quote from it when you refer to the Scripture, but to a revision of the 1611.
None of your Scriptures teach or even infer KJVOism. The point continues to be made that we wait for one Scripture that teaches that the KJV is the only inspired english Bible. Especially since the Bible was already written in English prior to 1611. If you prefer the KJV, great, but don't come here with a man based religious faith in KJVOism and call it biblical. If it were biblical you could show us in the Bible.
Bro Tony
BTW--you claim to use the AV1611 KJB--yet you don't even quote from it when you refer to the Scripture, but to a revision of the 1611.