-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have two questions for KJVOist.
- Thread starter David J
- Start date
- Status
Mr. Correa:Well they are men and they are teaching False Doctorines if they are teching from the NASB,NIV,NKJV and the new Gender friedly what ever it is!
SCRIPTURE, please?
As far my
"yeah be your Yeah" there are also nays and those folks are a big Nay in My book! They have said things that are completly un true and have tried to Slander my good name!
We know you only from your posts. And they haven't done much to win you a good name. You refuse to stick to topic and answer questions.
Read the post!It Dosent matter what I beleive in the scriptures are Above us All but to try and get some one to beleive you by spreading Falsehoods are a complete disgrace!
Then why do you try to spread the KJVO myth here? It's as false as it gets.
The AV 1611 is the proof that you asked for read and learn from it all you need is the WORD!
Then why don't you believe its translators where they wrote" "Variety of Translations Is Profitable for the Finding Out of the Sense of the Scriptures"? Before ya holler & say "That aint da TEXT", remember the same men who wrote the text wrote the preface.
SCRIPTURE, please?
As far my
"yeah be your Yeah" there are also nays and those folks are a big Nay in My book! They have said things that are completly un true and have tried to Slander my good name!
We know you only from your posts. And they haven't done much to win you a good name. You refuse to stick to topic and answer questions.
Read the post!It Dosent matter what I beleive in the scriptures are Above us All but to try and get some one to beleive you by spreading Falsehoods are a complete disgrace!
Then why do you try to spread the KJVO myth here? It's as false as it gets.
The AV 1611 is the proof that you asked for read and learn from it all you need is the WORD!
Then why don't you believe its translators where they wrote" "Variety of Translations Is Profitable for the Finding Out of the Sense of the Scriptures"? Before ya holler & say "That aint da TEXT", remember the same men who wrote the text wrote the preface.
william s. correa
New Member
I'm gald I was not there to judge! the questions in this thread have been answered thank you and you you have just answered them again for us by not Knowing what you are talking about! It is a Spiritual book not a Paper back Novel. Languages have their own Translations in their own Language but only One Word of God in any Language not Many VERSIONSSSSSSSSSS!
Mr. Correa:Sorry 2 Timothy 2 :15 the Only place the Bible tells us to "Study to show thyself approved unto God a Workman that needeth not to be ashamed rightly deviding the word of truth"
Mr. Correa, I thought you used the AV 1611!
My repro copy says "Study to SHEW..."
Anyway, please read my post above to Standing Firm & do the same as I asked him to do.
Mr. Correa, I thought you used the AV 1611!
My repro copy says "Study to SHEW..."
Anyway, please read my post above to Standing Firm & do the same as I asked him to do.
william s. correa
New Member
They have many times Over and over and over and over! sounds like a broken record!
william s. correa
New Member
what is that weird symbol in the NKJV anyways? it looks occultic!Originally posted by Dr. Bob:
The bibliolater crowd is sure alive and throwing on this thread. If it were up to me, I would ban them all for being schismatics. BTW, know what the Greek word for being divisive (like the onlies)and creating false teaching?
Study today means vastly different than what it did in 1611. Hence modern English translations use a variety of acceptable English words that shows it is NOT just "book learnin'" (which "study" today would indicate, like it's something we do to master a subject matter).
God's inspired Word was "spoudadzo" from the root "speedy". It's PRIMARY meaning - look it up in Strongs or any lexicon - is "to give diligence, be diligent, endeavour."
As this involves "work" (how foolish to say the other translation give a works-oriented version) it may also be translated as "labor" or "study". So the AV1611 is CORRECT, but our understanding of the word "study" is failing!
It is the EXACT SAME WORD translated "diligence" in the AV1611 in the same book! (2 Tim 4:9 & 21). How can it be "evil" or "sinful" to translate it as "diligence in 2 Tim 2:15? It is simply a choice the AV1611 men made from many equally-acceptable words, and the BEST in their day.
I'd encourage the bibliolaters to "study" a bit before showing gross ignorance of translations, logic and God's Word in public. It is embarrassing to many of us.
Have they ever been answered on any other forum in which we both participate? On every one of them, the KJVOs avoid the subject, trying to change it if possible. We even had one here who impugned the salvation of Doc Cassidy and myself. We see from his spelling, grammar, and groddy ideas, that he's not the roundest marble in the bag, but he still avoids the LACK OF SCRIPTURE question. And we have another, who, like "Peter AV" on Ezboard, keeps promising us Scriptural proof, and, also like Peter, has come up empty so far.
While I'm not gonna call those people outright liars, I don't hesitate to say they think more of a man-made doctrine than they do the TRUTH; otherwise they'd meet the problem of LACK OF SCRIPTURE head-on and admit THERE ISN'T ANY,and that the whole KJVO thingie is false.
That's the crux of the whole matter...that the KJVO myth is false, but its advocates just refuse to admit it due to reasons known only to themselves. As Christians, we have the D-U-T-Y to counter these false doctrines lest they lead a new Christian astray.
william s. correa
New Member
Ok but the only place in the "ENTIRE" book and they decided to change it Come on! Why? And the blood ommitted over 60 times that I can count, Why? What is that weird symbol in the front pages any ways ? I Know creatinists use that version but if it wasnt Broken why fix it? you notice that the devil only takes away from the Word for he Knows that if something is added a Scholar such as yourself will notice it right away so he Ommits, deletes, removes with out a reason cause he gave you something that looks good, reads well, feels good, and maybe is Ok but I 'm not taking any chances cause the Devil appears as an Angel of Light, but he was a murderer from the beggining, the Father of lies! So then I will not compramise my position I have gone too far to turn back now! Thanx and God bless
william s. correa
New Member
Why do you keep lying? You still have not answered either question. </font>[/QUOTE]"They" and you are the fibber
william s. correa
New Member
It is called a triquetra and is an ancient symbol of the Trinity.
Do you deny the Trinity? Do you think the Trinity is "occultic?" </font>[/QUOTE]Thats not what I heard
william s. correa
New Member
The reason for the occult logo probably has something to do with the fact that the NKJV was edited by a committee comprised largely of neo-evangelical leaders with ties to the occult. See Unholy Hands on the Bible and New King James Version: Counterfeit fhttp://www.centauri.com.br/ictus/greek.htm
9. Richard Kirby, The Mission of Mysticism, Society For Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1979, pp. 201-2.
or eye-openers on the NKJV.
9. Richard Kirby, The Mission of Mysticism, Society For Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1979, pp. 201-2.
or eye-openers on the NKJV.
william s. correa
New Member
Then whoever you have been listening to is a liar. Birds of a feather! </font>[/QUOTE]Let God be true and Every man a Liar
Attention all! Lets avoid these endless KJVO stall tactics. Please ignore them before this thread grows to 15 pages of spin and off topic post.
I truly think the most dishonest of the KJVO Camp tries to get threads like this off topic and shut down because it challenges KJVOism. So many times in the past I have seen threads hijacked in order to avoid answering direct questions.
My questions are not hard. I do not allow for KJVO spin and I'm sure that is why our KJVOist are avoiding the issues. If KJVOism is true then why will KJVOist not answer my two simple and direct questions?
If you can not provide the Scriptural support that can only be applied to the KJV then list your authority that is equal to Scriptural support for KJVOism.
Simply reading the KJV will never lead anyone to the KJVO position therefore there is another authority that is equal to Scriptural support for the KJVOist. After being a KJVO for 7 years and debating KJVOist for years I have yet to get an answer!
David J
I truly think the most dishonest of the KJVO Camp tries to get threads like this off topic and shut down because it challenges KJVOism. So many times in the past I have seen threads hijacked in order to avoid answering direct questions.
My questions are not hard. I do not allow for KJVO spin and I'm sure that is why our KJVOist are avoiding the issues. If KJVOism is true then why will KJVOist not answer my two simple and direct questions?
If you can not provide the Scriptural support that can only be applied to the KJV then list your authority that is equal to Scriptural support for KJVOism.
Simply reading the KJV will never lead anyone to the KJVO position therefore there is another authority that is equal to Scriptural support for the KJVOist. After being a KJVO for 7 years and debating KJVOist for years I have yet to get an answer!
David J
william s. correa
New Member
You were asked the same question several times and have not answered it. You say you did but you didn't. Therefore you are a liar, and you know what the bible says about "all liars" don't you? </font>[/QUOTE]I couldn't fall into hell if i went by it and slipped on a Bannana peeling, I have been sealed unto the day of redemtion!
- Status