Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This should read: "How many points of scripture do you agree with?" Each of these points is a clear response to scripture alone and thus they are consistent.
In your mind.This should read: "How many points of scripture do you agree with?" Each of these points is a clear response to scripture alone and thus they are consistent.
If one desires to deny scripture then one will deny these points and live with contradiction in their lives.
In scripture, which is also in my mind.In your mind.
Good.In scripture, which is also in my mind.
It is good. Scripture tells us we are corrupt by nature, God elected us without us meriting that election, Christ died for all whom the Father has given him, the elect cannot resist God's salvation so that they will not believe, and the elect will persevere to the end.Good.
Your commontaty on Scriptures not being cited here.It is good. Scripture tells us we are corrupt by nature, God elected us without us meriting that election, Christ died for all whom the Father has given him, the elect cannot resist God's salvation so that they will not believe, and the elect will persevere to the end.
These are all clearly taught in scripture and have been shown on countless threads in the BB for years now.
To those who have ears that hear and eyes that see, this truth is blessed comfort.
I suggest you thoroughly read Romans and then tell me I am wrong, or would you demand I quote the entire letter here for you as proof?Your commontaty on Scriptures not being cited here.
That you are wrong about what? You are wrong on some things. Depends on a specific issue and whether it is dealt with in Romans.I suggest you thoroughly read Romans and then tell me I am wrong, or would you demand I quote the entire letter here for you as proof?
This has already been addressed with you in numerous threads. You have looked for ways out and around. You refuse to see or hear. So be it.That you are wrong about what? You are wrong on some things. Depends on a specific issue and whether it is dealt with in Romans.
You are claiming nothing of any meaning.This has already been addressed with you in numerous threads. You have looked for ways out and around. You refuse to see or hear. So be it.
Indeed, to you, there is no meaning. You, therefore, prove my point.You are claiming nothing of any meaning.
So... what's the problem? Do you discount Romans 13?I used to be a regular supporter of the BBN (Listen to BBN now!) until they broadcasted John Calvin as someone who was a “great Christian” (Stories of Great Christians | moodyaudio.com). I contacted BBN and told then that I couldn’t send in my regular donations because of it. I wrote to them reminding them that John Calvin had Michael Servetus executed and then would go on to say…
"Whoever shall maintain that wrong is done to heretics and blasphemers in punishing them makes himself an accomplice in their crime and guilty as they are. There is no question here of man's authority; it is God who speaks, and clear it is what law he will have kept in the church, even to the end of the world. Wherefore does he demand of us a so extreme severity, if not to show us that due honor is not paid him, so long as we set not his service above every human consideration, so that we spare not kin, nor blood of any, and forget all humanity when the matter is to combat for His glory." - John Calvin
And some other quotes challenging the Calvin guy…
Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy. - Revelation 3:4
Did John Calvin defile his garments in toasting Michael Servetus?
“Neither God nor his Spirit have counselled such an action. Christ did not treat those who negated him that way.” - Italian poet Camillo Renato on the Servetus execution
“To kill a man is not to protect a doctrine, but it is to kill a man.” - French humanist Sébastien Chateillon on the Servetus execution
“I consider it a serious matter to kill men because they are in error on some question of scriptural interpretation, when we know that even the elect ones may be led astray into error.” - Michael Servetus
In 1908 a monument to Servetus was erected in the French city of Annemasse, some three miles [5 km] from the spot where he died. An inscription reads: “Michel Servetus, . . . geographer, physician, physiologist, contributed to the welfare of humanity by his scientific discoveries, his devotion to the sick and the poor, and the indomitable independence of his intelligence and his conscience. . . . His convictions were invincible. He made a sacrifice of his life for the cause of the truth.”
I suppose. Your undefined point. Undefinded it can mean anything you claim.Indeed, to you, there is no meaning. You, therefore, prove my point.
He could have quoted the whole Bible, but the truth remains…So... what's the problem? Do you discount Romans 13?