Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Norm Abortion is Post its speciality, drunkeness would go to Joshua, I know he dissagrees but when you promote drinking as ok some will get the message and move on to drunkeness, fornication and adultury in my opinion and the Bible homosexuality is sin so the practice is fornication and if married or with someone who is then adultery. as to wide range ungodly beliefs look at the threads on virgin born and abortion atleast that is my view you have the right to yours.
Xerglibmarliexngs Savings and Loan will give you Three Strawberries and a Grape / month in interest if you put them on deposit there.Originally posted by SheEagle911:
That's it! I'm hiding my Pez.
I have read a few of Post It's posts on abortion and his position is held by many people, including conservatives and liberals. While it is not my intention nor desire to enter this debate, making a case for murder for Post It's position, even by conservative scholars is typically considered untenable. As one moves from a conservative to fundamentalist perspective, I would suspect little support for his position. Moreover, I notice that Post It does not advocate abortion, but understands a necessity to engage in such a practice at times. Most would, I assume consider his position reasonable. In terms of Joshua, is it your assertion that he advocates drunkeness? Is it your position that if one is not generally opposed to drinking then one is generally in favor of drunkeness? How does that logically follow? And given that such a link would conceptually be your best argument, assuming it was logical, how do unrelated concepts like fornication, adultry, and homosexual behavior stem from: a) one generally allowing for drink, or b) one engaing in drink? I would think someone has a passel of 'splainin' to do. I will not quibble with you concerning homosexuality, for I can understand why you would assert the relationships that you have, however, responsible biblical scholarship, of which you are not likely to find agreement makes a plausible case for a commited homosexual relationship. It appears to me, in my brief membership on this board, that ungodly is typically criticism that is given for that which one disagrees. Hardly a rationale, even if the evaluation is actually correct. However, my larger point in this discussion remains -- when one seeks to marginalize a brother or sister in Christ or brothers and sisters in a greater sense: a) one, as a Christian, is grieving the Holy Spirit, and/or b) one ought to at least provide adequate support for such assertions to show cause why such assertions do not cause the Spirit grief, even if the behavior does. Wouldn't you consider such a fair statement? And if it is, either evidence needs to be forthcoming on what has been peviously stated or apologies are in order.
I have presented a scripture based argument before that supports homosexuality is not sinful when it is in the form of a committed relationship/marriage. Homosexuality, like heterosexuality can be sinful or not.
I have presented a scripture based argument before that supports homosexuality is not sinful when it is in the form of a committed relationship/marriage. Homosexuality, like heterosexuality can be sinful or not.
What about the Bible?
Nice try but what exactly do you know or could you know about Christ or salvation without the Bible. Whoever witnessed to you was either very old (2000 year range) or learned about the gospel from the Bible.[/QUOTE]
Brother, I think we will laugh about this foolishness in heaven. I will be there and I hope you will be there too.
Murph, of course you are the best judge of your time, and I am sorry time spent with me has been either distressful or wasteful or both. Perhaps all is not lost. Coming to the knowledge of truth is a lifelong pursuit for Christians who take seriously the task of righfully dividing the word of the Lord, and I make no claims at having exhausted truth, but what little I have found in comparsion to what may be gleaned (and we could quibble on questions of epistimology [perhaps another day
I have a similar salvation experience... except I came under conviction after hearing God's plan of salvation- from His Word, the Bible. Are you saying that somehow you were saved apart from the message of the Bible?
Just how long have you been beating your wife?