Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That is simply not true. When God created free will He created the potential for contrary choice, but he also created it in connection with full disclosure of the consequences and man being fully accountable for contrary choice. So indirectly, God is the author of sin, in the sense that God created the mechanism necessary for sin to exist (free will) but God did so without accountability for contrary choice as he made those with free choice accountable for their actions.
Sin originated from "good." No, you did not misread what I said. Sin originated from "good." When God finished creating he pronounced all things not just "good" but "very good." He could never have said that if evil had existed prior to the seventh day of creation. Hence, nothing but "good" and "very good" existed in creation.
A rationalization for how sin is derived from good may go like this; God created man to love Eve and to be sexually attracted and bonded to Eve so that he would forfeit his own life to preserve hers. Eve came directly from the hand of God and so had to be the most beautiful woman that has ever existed. In turn, Adam came directly from God and had to be the most attractive man that has ever existed. the natural magnatism between the two must have been enormous. God made them that way and that is "good." However, when Eve sinned Adam was forced to make a choice between love for God and love for Eve. He chose willfully to rather die with Eve than live without her. The sin was not love for Eve but loving Eve more than God.
Satan was made to glorfiy God as that is what angels are made to do. It was not sin to be like God. Indeed, we are commanded to be imitators of God (Eph. 5:1). To excel to be "like" God is "good." However, it became evil when he chose to excel not only to be "like" God but to the point of replacing God and thus becoming the object of glorification instead of God. The bible says that sin was "found" in Lucifer, rather than originating with God. Sin was derived from what is essentially "good" but distorted to an extreme that is not good. Now, I merely provided a rationalization.
It is true. It is not what you will openly say you believe, but it is the only logical implication of your belief. I am not implying dishonesty, just failure to accept logical consequences. God is "sovereign." Go back and recall what many on here have to me that sovereignty encompasses. If He actively controlled it and it happened, man would be trampling His will to do it against his sovereign will. It seems to me that God is hyper sovereign at some times and not others.That is not true. It is dishonest to mischaracterize what others believe.
Why did Eve sin?Because he chose his wife over his God.
So according to your theory God gave a special ability to believe to those whom He would save? That sounds remarkably like Efficacious Grace to me. Are you sure you are not a Calvinist?Some reason to give that man a special ability to choose to love or not love his Maker.
The things of God often make no sense to mankind.God creating man to merely answer an irresistible call makes no sense to me.
How few will there be, and where do you find that number in the bible? We know there will be a remnant, Romans 11:5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.Especially when you throw in the fact that relatively few will actually receive that "irresistible" call.
Because she was deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14 Adam wasn’t deceived, but the woman, being deceived, has fallen into disobedience;Why did Eve sin?
No, it is not.It is true.
Please do not accuse us of lying about what we believe.It is not what you will openly say you believe,
There is never a logical implication to an untruth other than it is untrue.but it is the only logical implication of your belief.
Yes, you are.I am not implying dishonesty,
What consequences? The consequence of believing the bible? The consequences of believing salvation is by grace and not works? The consequences of giving God the glory and not robbing any for myself? If so, guilty as charged!just failure to accept consequences.
Now you are accusing God of being "hyper" at some point then, presumably not "hyper" at other times? You believe God changes?It seems to me that God is hyper sovereign at some times and not others.
Why did Eve sin?
I agree that it was not Gods will for Adam to sin. There are some, I would assume are much more "hyper" than you, that have said "God ordained Adam's action before the foundation of The Earth." To me, ordained equals willed.
What is "hypersovereign?" It sounds like a word made up in order to hold on to one's autonomy.It is true. It is not what you will openly say you believe, but it is the only logical implication of your belief. I am not implying dishonesty, just failure to accept logical consequences. God is "sovereign." Go back and recall what many on here have to me that sovereignty encompasses. If He actively controlled it and it happened, man would be trampling His will to do it against his sovereign will. It seems to me that God is hyper sovereign at some times and not others.
Why did Eve sin?
I agree that it was not Gods will for Adam to sin. There are some, I would assume are much more "hyper" than you, that have said "God ordained Adam's action before the foundation of The Earth." To me, ordained equals willed.
The scriptures teach that Predestination refers to the elect in Christ, to the saved out people of God fro ranks of sinful Humanity, while double predestination states that God actively chose whom gets saved, and those who will be lost. My understanding is that God ordained that rejection of Jesus merits Hell and final judgement, but that all sinners also have chosen that end result.Explain to me the difference in ordaining someone to Hell and prrdestining someone to Hell. R.C. Sproul uses the term and says it is a legitimate term in Reformed theology.It is the negative result of a positive positive.
To me, that is exactly what Calvinism teaches; God chooses who will be saved. By defacto He is also choosing who will remain lost.....while double predestination states that God actively chose whom gets saved, and those ago will be lost.
An extreme application of His sovereignty.What is "hypersovereign?" It sounds like a word made up in order to hold on to one's autonomy.
Some do teach that, as I believe RC Sproul would, but my understanding is that God ordained the end result for sinners who keep on rejecting Jesus and salvation, but did not "force them" yo do that!To me, that is exactly what Calvinism teaches; God chooses who will be saved. By defacto He is also choosing who will remain lost.
You have stated the problem succinctly However, God's Word works from the presumption that man is "already condemned" justly. For example, the term choose, chosen, elect or election is never to damnation. However, election is "to" salvation which presumes they are already lost and condemned already.To me,
It's impossible to make God "extremely" Sovereign. Sovereign means that God rules supreme in every facet. There is nothing in which God is not in control.An extreme application of His sovereignty.
Yeshua, all humans rebel against God. It's not just an intellectual choice, it is a setting up of a personal kingdom in complete rebellion. Humans are the ISIS, which God will destroy.Some do teach that, as I believe RC Sproul would, but my understanding is that God ordained the end result for sinners who keep on rejecting Jesus and salvation, but did not "force them" yo do that!
I am speaking of your view of His sovereignty.It's impossible to make God "extremely" Sovereign. Sovereign means that God rules supreme in every facet. There is nothing in which God is not in control.
We must not only give up our own will we must die to ourselves that Christ might live.
Why do you coin a term that gives you the power of decision and yanks control from God. If you don't want a Sovereign God then have the courage to proclaim your own kingdom.
Again, it is impossible to over emphasize God's Sovereignty.I am speaking of your view of His sovereignty.
No, you are not. Please stop making such untrue accusations about what others believe.I am speaking of your view of His sovereignty.
There's plenty of "if." You can not even attempt to explain what determines who The Father will give to The Son.