I don'tCan I throw a monkey wrench in here?
Who thinks a local church affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention can be independent and fundamental? (Notice I did NOT capitalized the "i" and "f"
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don'tCan I throw a monkey wrench in here?
Who thinks a local church affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention can be independent and fundamental? (Notice I did NOT capitalized the "i" and "f"
SNIP
What I am saying is that when people attack the IFB they are allowing their limited view of a few to interfere in their judgment of all. I believe this is neither biblical nor moral in any way. I am not so much offended by the views of others as much as I just cannot understand how people can be so vehement that all IFP people need to bear the brunt of a few. Again I say name them, point them out or however you wish to expose the doers of evil but please do not cast all IFB believers into one mold because that makes you wrong regardless of your experience with a few.
May I be gracious in my responses to the board members! thjplgvp
I wouldn't trust Wikipedia if I were you. There is so much misinformation and disinformation on there, just as here on the BB. Paul Chappell and Clayton Reed commissioned a survey of IFB churches in America for their 2009 book, Church Still Works, and found 13,719 churches. That is only in the US.According to Wikipedia there are nearly 6000 IF Baptist congregations in America and it is unknown how many IF congregations that have no formal alliance.
Sometimes they even call it a denomination! Or talk as if there were some great leader or a headquarters responsible for the lapses.They are also ignoring the massive decentralization of the movement. From what I read they would hold thate there is a massive conspiracy encompassing every IFB church in the nation.
Sometimes they even call it a denomination! Or talk as if there were some great leader or a headquarters responsible for the lapses.
Jack Hyles 's "The Science of Calling a Pastor" Quote:
"Choose someone who is not a Bible expositor. There is not one expository sermon in the Bible. All of them are topical. I am not fighting expository preaching, but that kind of preaching will destroy a great church. Do not be swayed by their suave teaching. The great soul-winning churches have been pastored by topical preaching. I am not talking about evangelistic church; I mean soul-winning church! If you want a soul-winning church, you must call a pastor who preaches topical sermons."
"Many of our once great soul-winning churches fell prey to the popular notion of expository preaching. They decided that they wanted more Bible, but when they got it, it cost them their effective soul winning."
John R. Rice said, "Expository preaching, as it is done in most Bible-believing pulpits, does not grow soul-winning churches" (Why Our Churches Do Not Win Souls, Sword of the Lord, 1966, p. 74).
So both Hyles and Rice believed that expository preaching does not grow soul winning churches. I disagree Romans 10:17 says "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."
The preaching of God's Word is instrumental in a person's salvation. What do you think? Is expository preaching a danger to our churches? Hmmmm.
I don't
Jack Hyles was a cult leader. .
You did the exact same post on the "How to become an evangelist" thread, and I answered you there.How would you describe "revivalism" in the IFB churches? Is it just the idea that one can schedule a "revival week" ? Is it the idea that an "evangelist" should preach in a local church to reach a lost visitor? Is it when they have an altar call then repeat the sinner's prayer? Can an "evangelist" bring revival to a local church on a certain date in the calendar?
Is the purpose of an "evangelist" is to tell funny stories, play an instrument and swallow gold fishes? Where did IFB churches get all these ideas?
There is this little problem of attention span these days. Topical holds attention better. I usually put more scripture in a topical sermon than I put in an expository one. I think both have their place.Jack Hyles 's "The Science of Calling a Pastor" Quote:
"Choose someone who is not a Bible expositor. There is not one expository sermon in the Bible. All of them are topical. I am not fighting expository preaching, but that kind of preaching will destroy a great church. Do not be swayed by their suave teaching. The great soul-winning churches have been pastored by topical preaching. I am not talking about evangelistic church; I mean soul-winning church! If you want a soul-winning church, you must call a pastor who preaches topical sermons."
"Many of our once great soul-winning churches fell prey to the popular notion of expository preaching. They decided that they wanted more Bible, but when they got it, it cost them their effective soul winning."
John R. Rice said, "Expository preaching, as it is done in most Bible-believing pulpits, does not grow soul-winning churches" (Why Our Churches Do Not Win Souls, Sword of the Lord, 1966, p. 74).
So both Hyles and Rice believed that expository preaching does not grow soul winning churches. I disagree Romans 10:17 says "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."
The preaching of God's Word is instrumental in a person's salvation. What do you think? Is expository preaching a danger to our churches? Hmmmm.
There is this little problem of attention span these days. Topical holds attention better. I usually put more scripture in a topical sermon than I put in an expository one. I think both have their place.
The thing I have noticed IN GENERAL about audiences and expository sermons is that 1/3rd are hanging on every word and 2/3rds are fighting sleep.A boring sermon is a boring sermon, what can go wrong with one style can also go wrong with another on an equal level.
The thing I have noticed IN GENERAL about audiences and expository sermons is that 1/3rd are hanging in every word and 2/3eds are fighting sleep.
Squire, I wonder why you associate Hyles and BBFI churches with East Texas? Sure, Hyles did pastor in East Texas, but he was Southern Baptist back then, and I think attending East Texas Baptist (SBC) in Marshall. BBFI has roots that go back to J. Frank Norris, but we don't claim Fort Worth as part of East Texas!Hyles and his faction have their roots in the SBC. I term them and the BBF: the East Texas faction.
J. Frank Norris started the World Baptist Fellowship, IIRC in the early 1930s and originally called World Premillennial Missionary Baptist Fellowship. But independent Baptists in the South come from several strands, some of whom had little or no connection to J. Frank Norris. There was one group that I think was called the Orthodox Baptist Fellowship, led by men like W. Lee Rector and L. S. Ballard. Some of these men may have bumped shoulders with Norris at times, but were not led by him. I think the state of modernism among Baptist in the first quarter of the 20th century drove a lot of them toward independence and fundamentalism independently of others who were driven in the same direction.I believe J. Frank Norris started the IFB's in the South. Who do you think started the IFB's in the North?
Yes, too often we go off on tangents.Preachers also preached on hell to the exclusion of heaven and grace. The pendulum will swing as wide as it is pulled. Then it was only topical, now it is only expository. We should avoid the wide swing of the pendulum.
Hi. Just wondering which Wikipedia article has this 6000 number? I'm noticing that their article on BBFI shows 4500 for just them alone.According to Wikipedia there are nearly 6000 IF Baptist congregations in America and it is unknown how many IF congregations that have no formal alliance.