• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Interracial Marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magnetic Poles

New Member
righteousdude2 said:
I say to each their own [not that inter-racial marriages is wrong].....what a person does in this life is ultimately "blood on their hands" and their responsibility. The church can only teach so much. The truth is, today's church HAS VERY LITTLE to say that can convince others to live according to the Bible. Only those folks who really love the Lord [a narrow road of person headed to heaven] will listen and follow. The majority of the people in this world, many who claim to be religious:saint: , or even Christian:praying: , do just what they want to do regardless of the Word of God. In fact, these folks:1_grouphug: will go out and find a church and a teacher/preacher who will "tickle their ears" and give them that love pat on their backside, than send them along their way as they drive madly down the multi-lane freeway to hell.
And what does this rant have to do with the topic of interracial marriage?:rolleyes:
 

SaggyWoman

Active Member
standingfirminChrist said:
Why do you think God told the Jews not to marry outside of their nation? He did not command it just for people to shrug off like He did not mean it.

Joshua 23:12-13 Else if ye do in any wise go back, and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriages with them, and go in unto them, and they to you: Know for a certainty that the LORD your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the LORD your God hath given you.

A clear command not to marry outside the race. For when one does, the Word declares they will be a snare and trap to you and scourges in your sides.

SFIC,

I think the command had to do with others obeying God. If the ones of a different race chose to follow God, they could marry.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Let me derail this thread a bit by saying that I am surely ignorant in many areas.

Therefore, I have no particular problem with ignorance, and am not usually bothered by it.

However, after reading some posts in this thread, I'm convinced that some are abusing the privilege!

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EdSutton

New Member
Brother Bob said:
The very fact that you felt it necessary to tell your spouse that they would be welcome in your home, tells me that others around you would not welcome them.

I want you to know that I know you were referring to me and you are wrong and always seem to think the worst about someone. Blacks have stayed in my home and were welcome. My daughter was a basketball player and some of the players were black. The entire team stayed at my home several times. Now years have passed but they still come here to visit and are welcome. You have one of the worst attitudes of saying the worst, instead of thinking you did not understand the statement. Again, to not want my daughter to marry a black, still stands because of the life they would have to endure. Also, the family would have to endure also. You are so superior to everyone else that sometimes makes me ill. If anyone on here says because I feel as I do, that is hatred, then you are flat out wrong also.


BBob,
Actually, not at all. It actually had to do with her family, after she made the comment to me. It would not have bothered either my late mother, my late brother, or my close first cousin, and they were the only close kin that I had living, aside from my brother's six kids. I will not speculate as to extended family, even my own, for I have never conversed with any of them about such.

I did not know this per se, at the time, about some of her family, as neither she nor I live or even lived very close to her family, except for one uncle in Lexington, of whom the closest of any of the rest are over three hours away, and I had met any of, only one time, in person.

And I made no statement about hatred, or anyone hating another, at all, nor have I accused anyone of that. Inconsistency, definitely. The statement that you, in fact, did make was this.
If a bi-racial couple came to my church and offered themselves, I would take them in a minute. I am speaking of just in my home, not others about how I would feel.
This certainly implies you "feel" something, although you do not specify, here. I have no objection to anyone's preference, at all, as to whom they associate with, marry, work with, or what have you, as long as such is not contradicting Scripture. Is that a fair position? If it is contradicting Scripture, as I understand it, I do have an objection. I did read your posts, and in my mind, I pick up on what are, IMO, some 'latent racist attitudes' that seem to have been learned, even though some (not all) of them seem to bother you. (FTR, I seldom comment in any thread without reading all of it, first.) You mentioned something that happened among your own family that, and again I quote what you wrote:
I will step up to the plate and say that I would have a rough time dealing with it. If we are going to be honest then we must say what our real feelings are. We had a case in my close family, which caused a lot of hurt feeling all the way around. The child of this couple suffered the most, after a few years the family accepted it and show true love to the child, the parents divorced after a couple of years, but the damage to that child had already been done. People say they are not racist, but I really wonder, if it come home to them, whether you are black or white.

Some people speak of the South being racists, but the North is no different than the South. IMO

I wonder if it is sinful to bring a child into the world, knowing the kind of life it will have to live because of a mixe (sic) marriage. You certainly will cause that child to suffer more that we will ever know. I know of one child, who said "I wish I was white". He said this while he was still very young and when I heard of it, I knew that child was paying for the deeds of his parents and those of us who was around him.

Sure it is inconsistent, but we are what we are. We are a product of how we were raised. I remember when I traveled as a soldier on trains and stations seeing different places for whites and blacks. I on purpose sit where the blacks were, but did that change anything. No, it did not and I am glad those times are gone, but am I a rascist? If it means I have to accept inter-racial, then it becomes hard for me. Sorry if I offend anyone, I don't mean to. I am just giving a truthful answer.
I have never thought you were anything less than truthful, in the least. But how have I misread anything, here? I did not say it, you did. I do disagree with and/or question a few things here, though. I fully agree with rbell, that our background of how we were reared too often does become a cop-out. If one were to come from a background of alcoholism, for example, is it OK to dismiss the drinking from them, but not, say, from me, who had no such background, were I to be a member of a church you were associated with? I hope the standard would rightly be the same for both, especially if one were to be involved in some leadership position.
How about your own particular "hot button" issue of which you seem to mention more than any other poster of sexual immorality? Does someone get a 'free pass' from you because of a background that included this? I think not, and again, rightly so.
The OP of the thread mentioned that someone compared sodomy and interracial marraige. Fortunately, that was not you, but frankly, that is about as evil a statement as I have ever read on the BB. One does not read a much 'sicker' statement than that on the BB, or at least I have not in two years. Another poster made a flat statement that "Interracial marriages are not of God."
Another call that is extremely judgmental, to say the least. And I will not give either of those any 'pass' on such bigoted and dumb statements.

But I do not want to misunderstand you, or any other, Brother Bob. So how about explaining exactly what you mean by the parts I have copied, which were and are your own words? Fair request??

FTR, my bride's family came from Eastern Kentucky, which I also found out some years later (I just assumed they were from Ohio, where she grew up), and actually not too far from your neck of the woods, and were associated with the same group of Baptists you are affiliated with, namely, The Old Regular Baptists. I was and still am a 'flat-lander', myself.

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brian30755

New Member
Brother Bob said:
Yea, that rubbing in jail can be rough, I suppose..........:)


Brother Bob, you really shouldn't say things like this. You see, sometimes I'm reading these threads late at night, and when I bust a gut laughing out loud, it wakes my wife up. So stop it. :laugh:
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This Was NO Rant

Magnetic Poles said:
And what does this rant have to do with the topic of interracial marriage?:rolleyes:
I was expressing my view of inter-racial marriage. I was saying that no matter what we may believe [for or against] about inter-racial marriages, the final say is really up to the couple who make the decision to marry outside of their race. I used to think it was wrong, but, no longer see it that way. I have had many inter-racial couples serve along side of me in the ministry over the years, and I am totally repentant for my once bias thoughts.

Hope that makes my "rant" a little clearer.
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
With regards to my son (who is an infant now, so this issue is far, far in the future)...

I would have absolutely no problem with him dating or marrying someone of any ethnic heritage. I would have an issue with him marrying outside the faith, but that's a completely different matter.

As a caucasian (who doesn't tan very well), I wouldn't care if he married a black woman, and I wouldn't encourage him to avoid marrying someone of a different race because of the difficulties he might face. I'd prefer to hope and pray for a society that wouldn't cause those difficulties.
 

TC

Active Member
Site Supporter
Someone said that they questioned bringing a mixed child into the world because of what they will face. Well, I grew up in a school that was all the same - white. So, the fat kids and the kids that wore glassed got picked on. I was a fat kid who also wore thick glasses - I got double the torture. People tend to treat anyone different from the majority badly - the problem is sin. The world judges on externals, and we are not to be conformed to the world.

It has been pointed out that we all are decendants of Adam, so there is no such thing as different races. We may be from different nationalities and cultures, but we are all the same race. We cannot continue to justify our prejudices by saying that is just the way we are - it is a cop-out. God does not allow this passing of the buck (playing the blame game, or whatever else you wish to call it). God totally ignored Adam's blaming of Eve for his sin and said because of what you have done, this is your punishment. He did the same when Eve tried to blame the serpent. At some point, we have to take total responsibility for our own actions.
 

TCGreek

New Member
righteousdude2 said:
I was expressing my view of inter-racial marriage. I was saying that no matter what we may believe [for or against] about inter-racial marriages, the final say is really up to the couple who make the decision to marry outside of their race. I used to think it was wrong, but, no longer see it that way. I have had many inter-racial couples serve along side of me in the ministry over the years, and I am totally repentant for my once bias thoughts.

Hope that makes my "rant" a little clearer.

Praise God for your conversion! I pray that others would follow your example. :praying:
 

corndogggy

Active Member
Site Supporter
I've got to ask, do these relationships last? I mean, I never see any older mixed couples. Ever. The ones I see are always 18-40 or so. I know of one couple that may be 45, absolutely no more than 50, but they are the oldest I have ever met, it's very rare. Most of the "serious" mixed relationships are concentrated in the late 20's or early 30's and that's about it.
 

EdSutton

New Member
corndogggy said:
I've got to ask, do these relationships last? I mean, I never see any older mixed couples. Ever. The ones I see are always 18-40 or so. I know of one couple that may be 45, absolutely no more than 50, but they are the oldest I have ever met, it's very rare. Most of the "serious" mixed relationships are concentrated in the late 20's or early 30's and that's about it.
The one that I mentioned is much older than 45, and I know others that are (or were, as another close friend just died in their early 60s as a part of a 'mixed' couple, a year ago), as well.

Of course, I'm going on 60, so almost everyone I know is over 45, these days. :laugh: :laugh:

Ed
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
corndogggy said:
I've got to ask, do these relationships last? I mean, I never see any older mixed couples. Ever. The ones I see are always 18-40 or so. I know of one couple that may be 45, absolutely no more than 50, but they are the oldest I have ever met, it's very rare. Most of the "serious" mixed relationships are concentrated in the late 20's or early 30's and that's about it.

Could it be that 40 years ago interracial marriage was much less acceptable and therefore much less common?
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
StefanM said:
Could it be that 40 years ago interracial marriage was much less acceptable and therefore much less common?


Exactly, it's the same reason we don't see 40 yr old DVD players!!!

It was considered unacceptable, if not a down right sin in some of the more backward parts of our country....
 

rbell

Active Member
StefanM said:
Could it be that 40 years ago interracial marriage was much less acceptable and therefore much less common?

yep.

Not to mention...God is pretty clear on how serious marriage vows should be taken...j
 

Brother Bob

New Member
tinytim said:
Exactly, it's the same reason we don't see 40 yr old DVD players!!!

It was considered unacceptable, if not a down right sin in some of the more backward parts of our country....
Some of the backwards parts of our country is just not true. It was unacceptable throughout the whole country period!! You young whippersnappers just don't know what you are talking about, when it comes to interracial marriage.

These "sinners" built one of the greatest nations on the face of this earth, with always remembering God in every document they ever wrote. Sure mistakes were made, but to call them sinners is going too far. To sin, you have to "know" what you are doing is wrong, if it is.

Historically, Black-White interracial marriage has been the most
controversial of all types of intermarriage in the United States
(Porterfield, 1982). A total of 16 states maintained laws against
interracial marriage until the Supreme Court ruled in 1967 that such
laws were unconstitutional because they violated the equal protection
clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Marriage between blacks and whites is a longstanding and deeply ingrained taboo in American culture. On the eve of World War II, mixed-race marriage was illegal in most states,

If we are going to discuss this subject, lets keep it real at least and not lay it off on some backwoods people.


BBob,
 
Last edited by a moderator:

corndogggy

Active Member
Site Supporter
tinytim said:
Exactly, it's the same reason we don't see 40 yr old DVD players!!!

It was considered unacceptable...


So DVD players were considered unacceptable back then? Did we not have the technology for a mixed race couple to get together? Not quite the same thing there. :thumbs:

What's interesting though is this:

http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Features/6-03-20-SeniorCitizensLackTolerance.htm

Apparently even though the older folks are way behind in terms of tolerating mixed race marriages... half of them still say it's ok. Basically 2 out of 4 of them say it's ok, while 3 out of 4 of the rest of us say it's ok. I would think that this should mean that I should see more older mixed race couples than I do.

I guess my point is that this is a more common occurrence among the younger, more daring crowd. I assume that 20 years down the road when these same people are settled down and want different things out of life and have different goals, that these marriages start experiencing huge problems.

I would even bet that most of the same people who would enter into a mixed race relationship in their 20's and see nothing wrong with it, wouldn't do the same in their 40's, even if they continue to see nothing wrong with it.

I just think that alot of these relationships start because they are attracted to each other BECAUSE they are different races, instead of being attracted to each other as a person with no regards to race. Big difference, when you're talking about marriage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top