Reply to Skandelon;
You called me an Open Theist, blurring the line and ignoring I only agreed on this one point, everything is not predestined.[/quote] But that isn't the only point you hold to within Open Theism. You also have argued that God doesn't have exhaustive knowledge and that is the point most people equate with the Openness view with which they take the most issue.
Mormons affirm the doctrine baptism by immersion, so should we claim that we are all Mormans to a limited degree? This is an attempt on your part to blur the lines of distinction between orthodox Baptist believes regarding God's full and complete knowledge of all things and your Openists views which clearly deny this because you assume that full omniscience equals predetermination.
Yet, you appear to affirm that Peter denied Christ freely and that it was fully foreknown. I'd be interested to know how you affirm this is possible yet declare that God exhaustive knowledge somehow denies human freedom? Please explain.
You called me an Open Theist, blurring the line and ignoring I only agreed on this one point, everything is not predestined.[/quote] But that isn't the only point you hold to within Open Theism. You also have argued that God doesn't have exhaustive knowledge and that is the point most people equate with the Openness view with which they take the most issue.
Last edited by a moderator: