SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Right. No answer. No attempt to answer.
Looks like it’s time to ignore the fact you can’t answer and start another thread attacking reformed theology.
bananas
peace to you
Have a blessed day
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Right. No answer. No attempt to answer.
Looks like it’s time to ignore the fact you can’t answer and start another thread attacking reformed theology.
bananas
peace to you
To me, you're misunderstanding the Gospel of His grace, George.We're just splitting hairs now guys.
One thing is certain: God offering a man a false offer of salvation makes God a cruel deceiver of the worst sort.
Calvinism is a slander to God's character made palatable by the supposed great humility which that heresy allows a man to claim.
I'm sorry George, but I disagree.
The criterion is not faith, which is a benefit of being saved, but is rather God's purposes according to election ( Romans 9:11 ).
Paul literally spells it out in Romans 1 through Romans 11.
He tells the Roman believers why they have the faith that they have, which distinguishes them from the unbelievers around them.
The reason why people believe is because of God's work in a willfully rebellious sinner, drawing them to Himself in a merciful act of His grace.
The Lord Jesus tells us the same things in Matthew 11, Matthew 13, John 3, John 6, John 8, John 10 and many other places.
If you are unable to see that, then I am sorry, sir.
The criterion is not faith, which is a benefit of being saved, but is rather God's purposes according to election ( Romans 9:11 ).
The criterion is not faith
Well let's ask the guy who wrote the chapter. Just check PAUL'S CONCLUSION:
Rom 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of FAITH.
Rom 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
Rom 9:32 WHEREFORE?
Oh, I know! I know! Because of God's eternal decree of unconditional election?!
No:
Because they sought it not by FAITH, but as it were by the WORKS of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Rom 9:33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and WHOSOEVER [NOT THE "ELECT"] BELIEVETH on him shall not be ashamed.
The conclusion must interpret the development. Calvinism gets so lost in the development of the chapter that it forgets Paul's own conclusion of what he just said.
Once again the Calvinist changes the subject away the premise of my post, and to a vicious and vindictive attack on my character. It is sad to see so many professing Christians willing to engage according to the world's value system.Van, you are revealing your crutch again. Invariably, when the Bible reveals you to be wrong, you fall on Calvinism as your psychological means of holding to your false teaching. I, for one, am wondering when you will give up your crutch.
I recognize the truth of Romans 1:18-32, Romans 3:10-18 and many others, Van. That we as men are dead, and the only way that any of us seek Him is because of His work. Seeking the Lord and His ways is a matter of the heart, not a matter of outward obedience.
God doesn't offer us as men to save us if we do something.
He promises to save those that believe.
There's so much more to His glorious Gospel than what is presented from most pulpits today;
Much of it is very stark and sobering...
But it all results in His saints glorifying Him for even bothering with them.
Right, here the Calvinist denies Calvinism. According to Calvinism, the people entering were being compelled by irresistible grace, the "I" of the TULIP. But they were prevented from completing their entry, so the grace was not in fact irresistible. SNIPI see that they were entering the kingdom, because God had mercy on them and they were / are His elect. In other words, nothing they did, in and of themselves, ever resulted in the Lord granting them His favor.
One taint so after another denial of biblical truth.So do I, and it says nothing even close to what you've highlighted in red.
Your "poor translation" cop-out is just another crutch.One taint so after another denial of biblical truth.
I know what Acts 13:48 says and Calvinism's claims are no where to be found. Poor translations give an opening for false doctrine. As many as took the gospel's direction to eternal life believed.
The Greek word translated as appointed refers to an agreement by mutual consent. The failure to translate the word accurately provides the bogus foundation for false doctrine.
That doesn't mean that, for example, an omni-potent fiend is automatically righteous even when he does evil.
God must still be righteous, as well as omni-potent.
The reply of O man, who art thou is to a man arguing that it's not just of God not to save him even though he follows the works of the law whereas he saves the man who doesn't work - not to a man arguing that it is not just of God to randomly choose people without a criterion.
Paul tells you at the end of the chapter that there is a criterion, and that criterion of selection is not works, but faith.
The Greek word translated as appointed refers to an agreement by mutual consent. The failure to translate the word accurately provides the bogus foundation for false doctrine. Poor translations give an opening for false doctrine. As many as took the gospel's direction to eternal life believed.Your "poor translation" cop-out is just another crutch.
Here are other translations. Essentially, you are calling the vast number of scholars in Greek...poor translators, yet you hold your own paraphrase as superior. That is astonishing. [List edited]
New International Version
When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.
New American Standard Bible
When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and all who had been appointed to eternal life believed.
NASB 1995
When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.
NASB 1977
And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.
NET Bible
When the Gentiles heard this, they began to rejoice and praise the word of the Lord, and all who had been appointed for eternal life believed.
World English Bible
As the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of God. As many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Young's Literal Translation
And the nations hearing were glad, and were glorifying the word of the Lord, and did believe -- as many as were appointed to life age-during;
Thank youHave a blessed day
I also accept both 2 or 3, but seems to to be nature of God for choice 2!Why would David's infant go to heaven?
1) All babies are born sinless and thus are just like God, holy and perfect. Jesus death is unnecessary and in fact each child has the potential to be perfect throughout all its life.
2) God chose to extend grace to a corrupt human with a sin nature without requiring repentance or acceptance as a legal requirement for salvation. The infant is saved solely by grace alone.
3) God did not choose to redeem David's infant and the infant is eternally in hell due to the corrupt nature passed on from Adam to all.
The first option makes Romans 3:23 a lie, since in that scenario not all have sinned nor have they fallen short of the glory of God.
The second option requires faith that God mercifully chose to redeem the infant by extending grace. This is what David seems to indicate.
The third option realizes that a just God keeps his word when He says that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, therefore justice is meted out according to the law.
sbw, picks #1 with all its contradictions.
I pick #2, believing by faith that my beloved worships at the feet of the King.
I also accept that #3 is a just and fair option, even though it breaks my heart.
If there is 'a criterion of selection',
or "God is a Liar",
or "God is Insincere",
or "God does evil",
there is No God and No Savior.
many prefer a God who does what we desire Him to be doing!I believe the main point of those who can't Worship The God of The Bible for Who He Says He Is and Does is that "Jesus is not the savior".