Skandelon
<b>Moderator</b>
You wouldn't say Calvinism was born during that time, so I don't believe its fair to claim Arminianism was either. Both of these views (in different forms) existed long before the reformation as is evidenced in historical writings on the subject (which, btw, the more 'Calvinistic' (deterministic) interpretation didn't appear until Augustine, whereas the Early church fathers seem to strongly support the more common 'free will' approach)Skan,
I think Mr. Olson is taking some poetic license in linking Arminianism to the Reformation, at least in a positive sense. Most Arminians bristle at the thought of being considered as Protestants. One can say that Arminians are a product of the Reformation only in a highly qualified sense. Arminianism was born during the Reformation period. The Reformation and Reformed Theology are linked, with the latter proceeding from the former. Arminianism went its own direction and was officially repudiated by the Reformed churches at the Synod of Dordt.
I don't know of any non-Calvinistic Baptists who deny being Protestant. Can you name any notable ones?
Yes, that is what I was referring to. Thanks.The term "Reformed Baptist" is uniquely American, having entered usage in the 1960's. It came into use to describe an understanding of the Bible represented by the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith. The term was more comprehensive than "Particular Baptist" which centered one point of Calvinism. So, in that sense, Particular and Reformed Baptists are products of the Reformation and can be described as Protestants.