Is Obama a "natural born" citizen ?? Is his candidacy constitutional?

[KenH]

I edited my post and Ken edited his. Ken was pretty quick on the draw to catch it before my edit.....:laugh:

It's all in the timing. :laugh:

 

[tinytim]

Can we toss out both Senator McCain and Senator Obama from the race and just start over? :laugh:

Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?
Please!!! Can we?

PLEASE???

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Typical WND tripe

Geraghty defined the concerns most clearly, stating: "If Obama were born outside the United States, one could argue that he would not meet the legal definition of natural-born citizen … because U.S. law at the time of his birth required his natural-born parent (his mother) to have resided in the United States for '10 years, at least [f]ive of which had to be after the age of 16.'"

And if pigs could fly one could argue that they were birds.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Can we toss out both Senator McCain and Senator Obama from the race and just start over? :laugh:

I think we can all agree on this post

 

[dragonfly]

I think we can all agree on this post

No, I don't agree at all. I like Obama!

 

[Magnetic Poles]

No, I don't agree at all. I like Obama!

I do too, although I would have preferred John Edwards.

 

[LadyEagle]

And if pigs could fly one could argue that they were birds.

It's obvious that some here do not care if Obama meets the Constitutional requirements for POTUS. If what is posted here is only a minute fractional sampling of American citizens opinions, then the Constitution really doesn't matter anymore, like Henry Hyde said a few years back. If that is the case, we as a nation are toast. And so are our constitutional freedoms.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

It's obvious that some here do not care if Obama meets the Constitutional requirements for POTUS. If what is posted here is only a minute fractional sampling of American citizens opinions, then the Constitution really doesn't matter anymore, like Henry Hyde said a few years back. If that is the case, we as a nation are toast. And so are our constitutional freedoms.

You are exactly right, it is clear that people don't care what the Constitution says at all. They don't care that every natural born citizen, no matter what their race, background, or religion has the right to run for president, so they try to destroy them with trumped us suppositions.

Henry Hyde was right.

 

[Cutter]

You are exactly right, it is clear that people don't care what the Constitution says at all. They don't care that every natural born citizen, no matter what their race, background, or religion has the right to run for president, so they try to destroy them with trumped us suppositions.

Henry Hyde was right.

Roger, if the Obama campaign ever wants to form an anti-defamation team, you should apply. You definitely meet the criteria for the position. I have never seen such blind allegiance and passionate apologetics practiced by one human being for another. If that did not work out you can always get a position with the ACLU!

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Roger, if the Obama campaign ever wants to form an anti-defamation team, you should apply. You definitely meet the criteria for the position. I have never seen such blind allegiance and passionate apologetics practiced by one human being for another. If that did not work out you can always get a position with the ACLU!

You really haven't a clue have you?

I do not in any way, shape, or form support Sen Obama for president.

I do despise unfair politicking no matter who the victim.

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Roger, if the Obama campaign ever wants to form an anti-defamation team, you should apply. You definitely meet the criteria for the position. I have never seen such blind allegiance and passionate apologetics practiced by one human being for another. If that did not work out you can always get a position with the ACLU!

It isn't blind allegiance to support the truth. In fact, I believe Roger has made it clear, he doesn't support Obama for President. However, he is calling out those who use character assassination and lies to oppose a valid candidate. I am surprised those who attach the name of Christian to themselves support defamation.

 

[Revmitchell]

It isn't blind allegiance to support the truth. In fact, I believe Roger has made it clear, he doesn't support Obama for President. However, he is calling out those who use character assassination and lies to oppose a valid candidate. I am surprised those who attach the name of Christian to themselves support defamation.

Do you mean defamation like "Bush lied to get us into war"?

 

[Cutter]

You really haven't a clue have you.

I do not in any way, shape, or form support the Sen Obama for president.

I do despise unfair politicking no matter who the victim.

Oh, I have more than a clue, my friend!
That is why I said you would do so well in the proposed position. You can stand and make a statement like I do not support Obama for POTUS, then defend him so well in light of several instances of d*mning evidence or highly questionable relationships and ethics. You are a good one, oh yes you are! :thumbs:

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Do you mean defamation like "Bush lied to get us into war"?

If you want to discuss that, start a thread. Nice attempt to derail.

 

[Revmitchell]

If you want to discuss that, start a thread. Nice attempt to derail.

Nice

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Nice

Not at all...stay on topic. If you start a thread on your topic, I'll be happy to talk about your subject.

 

[Revmitchell]

Not at all...stay on topic. If you start a thread on your topic, I'll be happy to talk about your subject.

Then your false claim of unchristian behavior and defamation is clearly off topic by your own standard.

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Then your false claim of unchristian behavior and defamation is clearly off topic by your own standard.

Observation, not tryting to create a tangent, as you were.

 

[Revmitchell]

Observation, not tryting to create a tangent, as you were.

You may be right. Showing your hypocracy might just belong in another thread.

 

[Magnetic Poles]

You may be right. Showing your hypocracy might just belong in another thread.

Mitch, are you incapable of discussing a subject without insults and ad hominems? Apparently not. I have not attacked you, so get off your high horse.