That's exactly my concern. The avoidance of unrighteous judgement, not judgement itself. What commonly happens on this board is Person A saying So-and-So is a marxist, and if Person B says they disagree, then a common reaction from Person A is that Person B is a liberal, marxist, not a bible believer, or a whole list of other such comments. Likewise, we have instances of Person C saying So-and-So is a hero, and if Person D says they disagree, then a common reaction from Person C is that Person C is a right-winger, elitist, or a whole other list of other such comments.
What ever happenned to civil discussion and disagreement, simply allowing a person to disagree, and respecting the person regardless.
Do not derail this thread