See explanation given here:You are of course correct here;
This word is also translated as GRACED:thumbs::thumbs:
to you it was graced....:thumbs:
http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1735291&postcount=180
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
See explanation given here:You are of course correct here;
This word is also translated as GRACED:thumbs::thumbs:
to you it was graced....:thumbs:
Verse 29. For unto you. Unto you as Christians. This favour is granted unto you in your present
circumstances.
It is given. God concedes to you this privilege or advantage.
In the behalf of Christ. In the cause of Christ, or with a view to honour Christ. Or, these things are brought on you in consequence of your being Christians.
Not only to believe on him. It is represented here as a privilege to be permitted to believe on Christ. It is so.
Not in my vocabulary.Yes...this quote supports what i have posted;
to be permitted is to be Divinely enabled!
Not in my vocabulary.
FOR TO YOU IT HAS BEEN GRANTED FOR CHRIST'S SAKE: hoti humin echaristhe (3SAPI) to huper Christou: (Acts 5:41; Ro 5:3; Jas 1:2; 1Pe 4:13)
For it has been granted to you on behalf of Christ " (Lightfoot 1)
for it is his grace, his privilege bestowed upon you, that for Christ (Lightfoot 2)
For to you has been given the privilege of doing something for Christ (Barclay)
You are given, in this battle, the privilege (Phillips)
And the reason why you should not be terrified is because to you that very thing was given graciously as a favor for the sake of Christ and in His behalf, not only to be believing on Him but also to be suffering for His sake and in His behalf" (Wuest)
For (hoti) explains the reason the saints at Philippi did not need to be terrified by their opponents. Why? Because the opposition had been bequeathed to them from God as a gift of grace as explained below!
Vincent writes that (hoti) for...
justifies the preceding statement, but with special reference to soteria [word study]. The evidence that your courage is a divine token of salvation lies in the fact that God has graciously bestowed on you, along with faith in Christ, the privilege of suffering with Him. For faith implies oneness with Christ, and therefore fellowship with His sufferings (Ro 8:17-note; 2Th 1:5; 2Ti 2:12-note; Php 3:10-note). That you suffer with Christ proves your union with Him, and your union with Christ insures your salvation. (Philippians 1:29-30 Commentary Online)
Lange's Commentary...
For unto you it was given confirms the statement in Php 1:28, the last words of which (apo theou = from God) led the Apostle to adopt the passive form here. It is just you who are struggling and suffering together, to whom this grace [or undeserved favor] has been granted (charizomai) by God. Hence "you" (humin) has the emphatic position. (Philippians 1:27-30 Commentary Online)
You (humin) is emphatic by position and corresponds with the humon in Php 1:28.
TWO DIVINE
GIFTS
Granted (5483) (charizomai [word study] from charis [word study] = grace, unmerited favor) signifies a gift of grace and is the same verb Paul used in Php 2:9 (note) to describe the "bestowal" of the Name above every name upon Jesus. Suffering for the sake of Christ is the gift of grace or as both Barclay and Phillips put it "the privilege".
Charizomai is notes especially a grant of free favor or of kindness and thus is often used of free forgiveness (Lk 7:42, 2Co 2:7, 10, Ep 4:32-note, Col 3:13-note), sometimes of the work of free grace and salvation (Ro 8:32-note, 1Co 2:12), of an arbitrary, extra-legal, giving up of a prisoner to others, either for their freedom or penalty (Ac 3:14, 25:11, 16).
H C G Moule says that charizomai in this context speaks of "associations of sovereignty, favor, boon, (and) forms a noble paradox."
Marvin Vincent...
‘it hath been granted’; freely bestowed as a gracious gift. The word is significant as opening the conception of suffering from the Christian point of view. God rewards and indorses believers with the gift of suffering. In Paul’s bonds the Philippians are partakers with him of grace (Php 1:7-note. cp Acts 5.41). The aorist points to the original bestowment of the gift. (See Mt 5:11-note; Mk 10:38, 39.) (Philippians 1:29-30 Commentary Online)
Eadie observes that...
The aorist is used, as the apostle refers indefinitely to an early period of their past Christian history; but that the suffering continued, also, to the moment of his writing, is evident from the following echontes (experiencing - present tense = continuously)...
Faith in Christ is the means of salvation; but suffering is the evident token of salvation. The one secures it, the other foreshows it. The martyr is not saved, indeed, because he suffers; but his undaunted suffering betokens a present Saviour and a near salvation.
Note the two gifts: (1) The gift of faith which enables us to believe in Christ in the first place. Without this gift from the Lord, we would never be saved in the first place. (2) Then there is the gift of suffering—but it is the gift no one wants
Isaiah 55:6
Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near
Psalms 105:4
Seek the LORD, and his strength: seek his face evermore.
1 Chronicles 16:11
Seek the LORD and his strength, seek his face continually.
Matthew 6:33
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Luke 12:31
But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Matthew 6:33
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you
Psalms 105:4
Seek the LORD, and his strength: seek his face evermore.
Isaiah 55:6
Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:
Hebrews 11:6
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
1 Chronicles 22:19
Now set your heart and your soul to seek the LORD your God; arise therefore, and build ye the sanctuary of the LORD God, to bring the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and the holy vessels of God, into the house that is to be built to the name of the LORD.
Deuteronomy 4:29
But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
Proverbs 8:17
I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.
Jeremiah 29:13
And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.
Psalms 9:10
And they that know thy name will put their trust in thee: for thou, LORD, hast not forsaken them that seek thee.
Psalms 69:32
The humble shall see this, and be glad: and your heart shall live that seek God.
Job 8:5-6
If thou wouldest seek unto God betimes, and make thy supplication to the Almighty; If thou wert pure and upright; surely now he would awake for thee, and make the habitation of thy righteousness prosperous
Psalms 34:4
I sought the LORD, and he heard me, and delivered me from all my fears
2 Chronicles 12:14
And he did evil, because he prepared not his heart to seek the LORD
Salvation was given to those believers through faith, as a privilege, by grace, inasmuch as the privilege to suffer for his sake was given to the same believers.Ok....well lets expand your vocabulary with these brethrens help;
Glad to see that you finally accept the non-cal position.QF....
That is a good list of verses...but they do not address the original post.
Of course all men are responsible to seek God.
Glad to see that you finally accept the non-cal position.
All men are responsible to seek God (and to repent).
Thus the command: "all men everywhere to repent."
It is the responsibility of all men to seek God. They seek God without any gift of faith being given to them. That is what the verses that QF posted demonstrates. That is what those commands indicate. God doesn't give commands that man cannot obey.
They seek God without any gift of faith being given to them
in the words of P4T...wrong again DHK.....but you do have a remarkable consistencySuffering for Jesus is not given to unbelievers; neither is faith.
Don't make the verse say what it doesn't say.
__________________
Why would you believe something the Bible doesn't teach?Without the gift of saving faith...they seek in vain and will never be saved!
I'm not wrong, and you have never demonstrated it. You have two sides to Phil.1:29. You must be consistent. What is applicable to the first half is applicable to the second half and vice versa. You are trying to make the verse say what it doesn't.in the words of P4T...wrong again DHK.....but you do have a remarkable consistency
Calvinism deals with both sides of the coin...non cals look at one side primarily
Why would you believe something the Bible doesn't teach?
Show me from Scripture where faith is given to the unregenerate?
Faith in the Bible is: (1) a spiritual gift, (2) a fruit of the Spirit.
Does God give spiritual gifts and the fruit of the Spirit to the unsaved?
Does this position even make sense?
I'm not wrong...
Why would you believe something the Bible doesn't teach?
Show me from Scripture where faith is given to the unregenerate?
Faith in the Bible is: (1) a spiritual gift, (2) a fruit of the Spirit.
Does God give spiritual gifts and the fruit of the Spirit to the unsaved?
Does this position even make sense?
I'm not wrong, and you have never demonstrated it. You have two sides to Phil.1:29. You must be consistent. What is applicable to the first half is applicable to the second half and vice versa. You are trying to make the verse say what it doesn't.
Either both salvation and suffering are privileges and gifts of grace to be looked upon with favor by the believer,
or,
They are given to the unbeliever: suffering for Christ, and salvation in Christ. Which is it? It is one or the other. You can't have both.
Show me from Scripture where faith is given to the unregenerate?
Faith in the Bible is: (1) a spiritual gift, (2) a fruit of the Spirit.
Does God give spiritual gifts and the fruit of the Spirit to the unsaved?
Does this position even make sense?
DHK,
DHK...let me try it this way...as you keep offering this arguement.....
1]all men are conceived dead in Adam...unsaved.....all men children of wrath
2] God has purposed to save a multitude of unsaved men......not all
3]Unsaved men cannot be saved.....by themselves....they do not want or seek God by themself.
4] God is the one who gives salvation as a free gift to many
5] a new heart,saving faith, repentance,belief, perserverance , are all a part of salvation
6] there are other kinds of faith..... false faith, natural faith, deceived faith
an unsaved man can have faith in a cow, or ganesh, or allah......but this is the wrong object of faith.....so not saving faith
7 Jesus is the author and finisher of faith.....no definate article....to those he gives it to...ie, the elect
8] so....unsaved men.unregenerate men,,,,when converted by God....are "given" what you say they cannot be given.
9] only those unregenerate men ...given life, a new heart, repentance and faith.....are saved
10] after being saved they are also given a gift of faith...which is again seperate from saving faith....
So ...no unregenerate men cannot have spiritual gifts...WITHOUT THE SPIRIT!!!!
But when God regenerates and unsaved man....He is indwelt by the Spirit...and if he is willing to study the word...in time he will understand the grace of God.
That is how it makes sense.Anything else ....does not
Glory to God for this!!!!! :thumbsup:
The feeling from non-cals that we are "free," seeking God (prior to salvation) "good" contrary to Scriptures et al is fallacy.
Jesus said we are not free, but are slaves to sin in our lost state.
The failure is that they look through man's lens and fail to see what God sees through His lens, which is given to us in the Word of God.
The only faith that God gives is that faith which is inherent from the beginning. As Jesus said: "Unless you have faith as a child..." Even children have faith. That cannot be denied unless you deny the words of Jesus. Children have faith in their parents, that their parents will provide, protect, guide them. The object of their faith is their parents."Show me in Scripture where God gives faith to the unregenerate"
- DHK
What double-talk. According to DHK God has already given all men faith when unregenerate. All they have to do is "exercise" it and "voila!!!!"
But when we show him from Scripture God gives this to the elect, to believe at salvation, he flips out, yet says they already have it.
Hmmmm.
Where did it come from?
Scripture is clear. God gives faith as a gift to believe on Him for salvation.
You are good up to this point.DHK,
DHK...let me try it this way...as you keep offering this arguement.....
1]all men are conceived dead in Adam...unsaved.....all men children of wrath
2] God has purposed to save a multitude of unsaved men......not all
3]Unsaved men cannot be saved.....by themselves....they do not want or seek God by themself.
4] God is the one who gives salvation as a free gift to many
He does give us a new heart at salvation. However, God did not give saving faith; we were commanded to believe. God did not give repentance; we were commanded to repent. God did not give "perseverance (in the Calvinistic definition); he gave us eternal security.5] a new heart,saving faith, repentance,belief, perserverance , are all a part of salvation
There is only one kind of faith. Faith is faith. It is confidence, trust. Look it up in a dictionary. It is the object of the faith that is important. The object of one's faith must be Christ. If he is not the object of your faith then you cannot be saved; thus the verse: "the author and finisher of our faith." He is the object of our faith from beginning to end.6] there are other kinds of faith..... false faith, natural faith, deceived faith.
Faith is faith--confidence, trust.an unsaved man can have faith in a cow, or ganesh, or allah......but this is the wrong object of faith.....so not saving faith
He is the object of our faith from beginning to end to all that believe.7 Jesus is the author and finisher of faith.....no definate article....to those he gives it to...ie, the elect
To be regenerated is to be saved. They both happen at the same time.8] so....unsaved men.unregenerate men,,,,when converted by God....are "given" what you say they cannot be given.
They are given a new life and a new heart. But they had to believe and repent in order to get that far; in order to be regenerated.9] only those unregenerate men ...given life, a new heart, repentance and faith.....are saved
For one to believe that God would give spiritual gifts and the fruit of the Spirit to the unregenerate is astounding. How can you believe in such an unbiblical concept??10] after being saved they are also given a gift of faith...which is again seperate from saving faith....
And that only comes at salvation. Therefore faith of any kind never comes before salvation.So ...no unregenerate men cannot have spiritual gifts...WITHOUT THE SPIRIT!!!!
When he is regenerated and saved, yes.But when God regenerates and unsaved man....He is indwelt by the Spirit...and if he is willing to study the word...in time he will understand the grace of God.:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
Yes, this would be the "general call." This is the call that refers to the proclamation of the message.Scripture teaches, "Many are called, but few are chosen," thus proving that all called are not necessarily chosen.
All these verbs are transitive active verbs with God as the subject and people as the direct object. The same group of people are the recipients of all these actions. None is a subset of the other.Even real Calvinists affirms the universal nature of the gospel's call. So, the question at hand is whether the "call" Paul is speaking of (in Romans 8) is the so-called "effectual calling" of the Calvinistic system (which is NEVER expounded upon in scripture), or if he is simply speaking of the gospel call (which is extensively taught about) by which those who do respond are justified, sanctified and glorified. In the list Paul gives, the faith response is not included, it is assumed, thus to insist this text supports the Calvinistic rendering is presumptuous...and really an argument from silence.