Is the SBC getting liberal?

[FollowTheWay]

What's your point? You are going to have to elaborate.

Seems clear to me. Michal had no child but but Michal had five sons. These are conflicting statements.

 

[FollowTheWay]

This is a sophomoric attempt to make a case you are not prepared to make. Copiest errors do not affect inerrancy. Neither were copiest errors in view in the SBC conservative resurgence.

The question of inerrancy leads to the question of inerrancy of what. Inerrancy of the original manuscript (which we don't have), inerrancy of a particular source, inerrancy of a particular version or translation of the Bible, inerrancy of doctrine, etc. To categorically state without qualification that the Bible is without error implies all of these are true. Tell me what you believe is inerrant and we can discuss that.

 

[Reynolds]

Seems clear to me. Michal had no child but but Michal had five sons. These are conflicting statements.

Ok. You need to prove Merab was Michael.

 

[Revmitchell]

The question of inerrancy leads to the question of inerrancy of what. Inerrancy of the original manuscript (which we don't have), inerrancy of a particular source, inerrancy of a particular version or translation of the Bible, inerrancy of doctrine, etc. To categorically state without qualification that the Bible is without error implies all of these are true. Tell me what you believe is inerrant and we can discuss that.

You do not want to have a discussion. I have never once seen you attempt a real discussion. You are a flamer always have been. I am not sure you are even capable of an intelligent discussion. I have never seen it happen. You throw out copiest errors as an example of errancy of scripture which tells me you do not believe the bible is true from cover to cover. You defend liberals who went to the hyper liberal CBF because of their views of the bible. You do not want to discuss you want to argue.

 

[Reynolds]

Ok. You need to prove Merab was Michael.

And I will add, that if you can successfully do that, you will face another hurdle that can not be overcome.

 

[FollowTheWay]

You do not want to have a discussion. I have never once seen you attempt a real discussion. You are a flamer always have been. I am not sure you are even capable of an intelligent discussion. I have never seen it happen. You throw out copiest errors as an example of errancy of scripture which tells me you do not believe the bible is true from cover to cover. You defend liberals who went to the hyper liberal CBF because of their views of the bible. You do not want to discuss you want to argue.

Balderdash

Examples:

#40 FollowTheWay, Jun 9, 2017

#106 FollowTheWay, Today at 7:56 AM

#107 FollowTheWay, Today at 8:14 AM

 

[FollowTheWay]

Ok. You need to prove Merab was Michael.

For 2 Sam 21:8 Merab was used in two Hebrew manuscripts, Septuagint; most Hebrew manuscripts Michal

 

[Reynolds]

For 2 Sam 21:8 Merab was used in two Hebrew manuscripts, Septuagint; most Hebrew manuscripts Michal

Merab is Michael's sister.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

This thread is closed.

Six Hour Warning
This thread will be closed sometime after 2 AM Pacific.