• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is the SBC getting liberal?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The schism in the SBC had nothing to do with liberal theology. It was all about the fundamentalists seizing political power to support the Republican Party.

This has to be one of the most ideological and ignorant statements ever made on this board.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Liberals do not need facts they just need ideology and good intentions. Facts and results are irrelevant.
Do you really believe that the Bible is absolutely inerrant? That was what culled out many great professors from the SBS. I could provide about 10 references which disprove that belief. What version of the Bible do you want me to use? let's use the KJV. OK?
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then why do you make the statement that Democrats cannot be Christians. The Republican Party is calling the shots for the SBC leadership.
Maybe SBC "leadership" has enough sense to not be pro murder of the unborn and pro homosexual agenda advancement.
After all, other than the fact that they want to murder babies and that they want to advance every imaginable perversion, the Democrats are not that bad.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you really believe that the Bible is absolutely inerrant? That was what culled out many great professors from the SBS. I could provide about 10 references which disprove that belief. What version of the Bible do you want me to use? let's use the KJV. OK?
The Bible is inerrant. I already know what you will post.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Bible is inerrant. I already know what you will post.
Inerrant means without error. Correct? What's your definition? These incongruities have no impact on my faith whatsoever. I simply don't accept calling someone liberal theologically if they point that out. Now what am I going to say?
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Inerrant means without error. Correct? What's your definition? These incongruities have no impact on my faith whatsoever. I simply don't accept calling someone liberal theologically if they point that out. Now what am I going to say?
you are going to pick out 10 of the usual 30 something "errors" in scripture. None are errors. Type away. I won't do your work for you.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
you are going to pick out 10 of the usual 30 something "errors" in scripture. None are errors. Type away. I won't do your work for you.
How old was Ahaziah?

  • II Kings 8:26 "Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."
vs.

  • II Chronicles 22:2 "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How old was Ahaziah?

  • II Kings 8:26 "Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."
vs.

  • II Chronicles 22:2 "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."

This is a sophomoric attempt to make a case you are not prepared to make. Copiest errors do not affect inerrancy. Neither were copiest errors in view in the SBC conservative resurgence.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How old was Ahaziah?

  • II Kings 8:26 "Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."
vs.

  • II Chronicles 22:2 "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign."
22. You are dealing with a copyist error that made it into KJV, Tyndale, Geneva. You looked at it in other translations?
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is a sophomoric attempt to make a case you are not prepared to make. Copiest errors do not affect inerrancy. Neither were copiest errors in view in the SBC conservative resurgence.
ESV
22. You are dealing with a copyist error that made it into KJV, Tyndale, Geneva. You looked at it in other translations?
ESV

2Ki 8:26

Ahaziah was twenty-two years old when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Athaliah; she was a granddaughter of Omri king of Israel.

2Ch 22:2

Ahaziah was twenty-two[fn] years old when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Athaliah, the granddaughter of Omri

Note: See 2 Kings 8:26; Hebrew forty-two; Septuagint twenty

This was changed when the Old testament Bible was translated into Greek.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
22. You are dealing with a copyist error that made it into KJV, Tyndale, Geneva. You looked at it in other translations?
Did Michal have children?
ESV
2Sa 6:23
And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to the day of her death.

2Sa 21:8 The king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bore to Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Merab[fn] the daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite;
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Did Michal have children?
ESV
2Sa 6:23
And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to the day of her death.

2Sa 21:8 The king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bore to Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Merab[fn] the daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite;
What's your point? You are going to have to elaborate.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
ESV

ESV

2Ki 8:26

Ahaziah was twenty-two years old when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Athaliah; she was a granddaughter of Omri king of Israel.

2Ch 22:2

Ahaziah was twenty-two[fn] years old when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Athaliah, the granddaughter of Omri

Note: See 2 Kings 8:26; Hebrew forty-two; Septuagint twenty

This was changed when the Old testament Bible was translated into Greek.

Diiiiiiid...................you not read my post?
 

Katarina Von Bora

Active Member
Doctrine wise, I agree. Behavior on social issues is where I disagree. The SBC as of late has gone on its apology tour for being ashamed of its past. Our delegate came back from the convention last year saying he thought that the name Southern in the name SBC was actually in jeopardy. Fast forward to this year, divisive bad behavior is rewarded because a prominent BLACK pastor was the sponsor.

This is completely true. I read SBC Voices every day. I left an SBC church that I attended for decades, for their nonsense in supporting a clearly adulterous and lying church leader. There is no way to condone that.

I'm a Baptist always, but the scriptures tell us to separate ourselves from evil-doing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top