Featured Is the SBC getting liberal?

Uh excuse me sir, no one has advocated this however there is no evidence of it either. What you have posted can be true but understood in a different light rather than your negative connotation. When one is ignorant it is easy to come to the wrong conclusions. If you do not know the inner workings, purposes, and goals of the SBC actions can be interpreted wrong.

 

One of the mistakes churches make is to put the reversion clause in the by-laws but not in the deed. By-laws can be easily changed but deeds are far more difficult.

 

Correct. We could cleanly break from SBC at our next business meeting, if we so chose.

 

It is amazing how some of the posters on this thread missed what BOTH Cassidy and I pointed out.

Basically, ALL SBC affiliated churches should get legal assurance that the original deeds are truly unincumbered, and not binding to the convention.

Also, the church archives need to have on file letters from all loans sowing payment in full - typically called "release of loan" signed and notarized by the grantor of the loan.

Btw, what I previously posted was not an exaggeration, or some fundy rumor. That my integrity was called into question was totally unwarranted. Because of this, I will not comment on this thread, again. It would not be wise nor peaceable to continue participation.

 

Our church is 150+ years older than the convention. We are definitely not encumbered to the convention. Several of the churches in this county are. That's because the association planted them and gave them a lot of financial support at start up.

 

The one I have actually read does not.It is with the local association and not the SBC directly. It is pretty unincumbering. Basically it states that if the church dissolves, the property reverts to the association. It does not even state the church has to remain a member of the association.

One church actually did dissolve. The association ran it for a while as a youth home. The association later closed the youth home and sold the property.

 

Is the local association not SBC?

 

Yes, but I am not sure as to the exact details of how the affiliation operates. It is a separate entity that owns its own property etc. I have never really thought much about it.

 

The SBC works on 4 levels. The first level is the local churches, the second level is the local associations, the third level is the state conventions, and the fourth level is the national convention. They are all autonomous organizations. The national convention has no authority over anyone and there is no hierarchy. The same goes for all the rest. Decisions are made from the bottom up. We cooperate for the purpose of missions and support but the day to day activities of churches is a separate issue. When the state or local associations provide funding for property and buildings there remains for a time control of those properties or buildings by the state or local associations. That does not impose a hierarchy on the church itself. Those who provide funds simply want to make sure the monies go to exactly what it was intended for and nothing else. There is an accountability in that aspect but it does not effect any other part.

 

Thanks. That is how I had always assumed it worked, but did not know for sure.

 

The CBF is not liberal in its theology. Many left the SBC because they refused to sign Mueller's statement of faith. There were things in there that were not part of traditional Baptist core beliefs. Besides that, BaptistS have never believed in hard and fast confessions but rather in Soul Freedom and the Priesthood of believers. The SBS lost some outstanding professors and the SBC lost a large number of excellent missionaries in what was really a political fight for control to align the SBC with the Republican party.

 

Does the CBF have a theological statement?

 

That's a good question. I belong to a dual aligned Baptist Church but most members are not aware of its status. I know there's a set of core values but am not aware of a formal statement of faith. Personally, I tend to stand with the 1883 NH Confession.

 

"Because of the opprobrious epithet "liberal," today they call themselves "moderates." A skunk by any other name still stinks!" W.A. Criswell

 

The schism in the SBC had nothing to do with liberal theology. It was all about the fundamentalists seizing political power to support the Republican Party.