Featured John 3:16, The Meaning of "kosmos"

People choose to hear what they want to hear. God knowing this does not cause it. God provides the truth, and by it sanctifies a man to hear, but some will not hear anyway, Acts of the Apostles 7:51; Hebrews 10:29.

 

I am not sure why a mystery element must be applied to simple and clear statements that God has not intended to be mysterious. He makes simple statements of what he has done and what he will do, and sometimes he even tells us why he did it. Such is the case in Jn 3. He sent his son because he loved the world, he said. How simple is that? He said he loved it a lot. He sent the best thing he had to save it. Some of you try to tell others of us that he did not mean that. He then says he will save anyone/everyone who believes in him. This is consistent throughout all the New Testament. Then you throw something into the mix that is neither in the text and most people have never even heard of; prevenient grace. What in the world is that? It is not something that God wants us to know anything about because he did not say anything about it. It muddies the water. It is intended to make people look scholarly, but what it does is shows a man is justifying his unbelief of simple words and making the texts of scriptures conform to his own presuppositions and notions. It is not faith in what is said. Jn 3 is not a parable.

 

No. I said what I meant. God provides the truth, by God's truth He sanctifes a man to hear. If a man chooses to hear then by that hearing God has given the man a change of mind, 2 Timothy 2:25. If the man refuses to hear, the man does not change his mind, Acts of the Apostles 7:51, Hebrews 10:29.

 

Fiction "For God loved the world (mankind) in this way...

 

God demonstrated His love toward us in that while we were still sinners, He died for us. His love for all mankind is demonstrated by Him laying down His life as a ransom for all. However, only those whose faith God credits as righteousness are chosen, thus a conditional individual election for salvation.

 

You are not hearing. God's truth sacnctifes, John 17:17. God's natural revelation being heard gives all men some kind of faith, Romans 10:17-18, so there is no excuse for any refusing to hear the gospel. Some men refuse to hear the truth of the gospel, Hebrews 10:29.

 

1 Peter 1:2.
2 Thessalonians 2:13-14.

 

It would have to depend on the translation. The New World Translation (NWT) is not just an imperfect translation in that it never attempts to faithfully translate the original languages. The prevailing idea in the NWT is that Jesus is god-like, but certainly not God. So, the NWT would be in a vastly different category than the KJV, NASB, NLT, ESV, etc. So it is far less likely the NWT would be a tool of conversion.

The Archangel

 

Well this is a side issue. There is the issue of translation, which sets the NWT against NASB, NLT, ESV, etc. But as for the chosen Greek text(s) the KJV is set against the NWT, NASB, NLT, ESV, etc. A baptist pastor went from the NASB back to the KJV over this textual issue. John 1:18 for example. You can check for other references and see for yourselves.

 

I know of the differences in the families of manuscripts. However, it is apples and oranges. The different textual families do not deny the tenants of the faith while the NWT does.

The Archangel

 

Maybe?.... Maybe some passages, but it would depend on which passage was being read. If it's John 1:1, then no.

The Archangel

 

The reasoning is not moot. The NWT in John 1:1 reads, "the word was a god" (emphasis mine). If that person is reading John 1:1 thinking Jesus--the Word--is a god and not the one, true, and living God--that would not be the God of the Bible and no real conversion would have happened.

And, I might add, we were not discussing "Gospel Messages;" we were discussing picking up a particular translation and reading it. These are two different things.

The Archangel

 

What is really the words of God is a tenant of the faith which now Bible believing Christians are being taught side with the non-believers on the text. It is an issue.

 

To clarify: The different textual traditions are an issue? Are you considering that one of the traditions does not faithfully represent the Word of God?

The Archangel

 

Comes from the same word where we get our English word cosmetics. Because when a woman gets up in the mornings she uses cosmetics to create order out of chaos.

The meaning is that Satan has an organized system in place in the fallen world, the kosmos.