1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Kingdom Exclusion

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Lacy Evans, Sep 7, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I also know he will return, so that's not something that I hope for. Although, I might hope that it's soon. But, in your statement above, you are saying that you know he's going to return, but you hope he's going to return. I've heard people preach that "hope" means "assurance", but that is simply someone who is desparate to make a conditional promise fit the mold of everlasting salvation. A hope is not something that's assured. (Although, since he has promised things in exchange for obedience, we are assured that he will carry out his promises if we are faithful, but we hope that we will receive those rewards and we hope that we will receive glory.)

    Vol. 4: Analytical lexicon of the Greek New Testament, from Baker's Greek New Testament library, by Friberg, Friberg, and Miller, Louw and Nida’s Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament : Based on semantic domains (Vol. 1, Page 295), from the United Bible societies, Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English Lexicon, Moulton’s Analytical Greek Lexicon, The Greek and English Lexicon to the New Testament by Greene, and the Bauer, Danker, Arndt, and Gingrich’s A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (also known as the BDAG for short), all of which are considered standards in the field of Greek Lexicons, define the verb form as “to look forward to something, with implication of confidence about something coming to pass, to hope, or to hope for; to look forward to something in view of the measures one takes to ensure fulfillment; expect”. The noun form is defined as, “the looking forward to something with some reason for confidence respecting fulfillment, hope, expectation, that which is the basis for hoping, foundation of hope, that for which one hopes, something hoped for”. (These definitions are actually from the BDAG, but all the definitions are along these lines.)

    Hope means to look forward with confidence to that which is good and beneficial; to hope, to hope for, hope. Some examples can be found in Luke 24:21, which says, “and we had hoped that he would be the one who was going to redeem Israel”; 1 Timothy 4:10, which says, “because we have placed our hope in the living God”; Acts 23:6 in which Paul says, “I am on trial (here) because I hope that the dead will rise to life”; Romans 15:4: “in order that through patience and encouragement given by the Scriptures we might have hope.”

    Hope means to expect, with the implication of some benefit; to expect, to hope. In Luke 6:34-35, we find [And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again. But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil. ]. An example using “that which is hoped for” can be found in Romans 8:24, which says, “when what is hoped for is seen, there is no longer any need to hope”. The word can be used to reference that which constitutes the cause or reason for hoping; the basis for hope, the reason for hope. 1 Thessalonians 2:19 says, “for who is the basis for our hope or joy?” This expression in 1 Thessalonians 2.19 may be rendered as, “for who is the one who causes us to hope and to have joy [to be happy]?”
     
  2. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hope
    HOPE
    , n. [L. cupio.]
    1. A desire of some good, accompanied with at least a slight expectation of obtaining it, or a belief that it is obtainable. Hope differs from wish and desire in this, that it implies some expectation of obtaining the good desired, or the possibility of possessing it. Hope therefore always gives pleasure or joy; whereas wish and desire may produce or be accompanied with pain and anxiety.
    The hypocrite's hope shall perish. Job 8.
    He wish'ed, but not with hope--
    Sweet hope! kind cheat!
    He that lives upon hope, will die fasting.
    2. Confidence in a future event; the highest degree of well founded expectation of good; as a hope founded on God's gracious promises; a scriptural sense.
    A well founded scriptural hope,is, in our religion, the source of ineffable happiness.
    3. That which gives hope; he or that which furnishes ground of expectation, or promises desired good. The hope of Israel is the Messiah.
    The Lord will be the hope of his people. Joel 3.
    4. An opinion or belief not amounting to certainty, but grounded on substantial evidence. The christian indulges a hope, that his sins are pardoned.
    HOPE, v.i.
    1. To cherish a desire of food, with some expectation of obtaining it, or a belief that it is obtainable.
    Hope for good success.
    Be sober and hope to the end. 1 Pet 1.
    Hope humbly then, with trembling pinions soar.
    2. To place confidence in; to trust in with confident expectation of good.
    Why art thou cast down, O my soul,and why art thou disquieted within me? Hope thou in God. Psa 43.
    HOPE, v.t. To desire with expectation of good, or a belief that it may be obtained. But as a transitive verb, it is seldom used,and the phrases in which it is so used are elliptical, for being understood.
    So stands the Thracian herdsman with his spear,
    Full in the gap,and hopes the hunted bear.
    HOPE, n. A sloping plain between ridges of mountains. [Not in use.]
     
  3. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    no, inheritance and being an heir are two different things. Being an heir is not a guarantee of inheritance. If an inheritance is conditional, an heir must meet the conditions.

    Romans 8:17
    17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
     
    #143 James_Newman, Sep 18, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 18, 2006
  4. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    "Sonship" is never in question. A saved person is a son. But the "firstborn" blessing is conditional. Esau was a son and even recieved the normal portion of a son. But what he lost was his rights as a firstborn son. So can we.

    lacy
     
  5. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    We as believers are "in Christ". We are grafted to Him. We share in the rights of God's "Firstborn" Son. We cannot lose that.
     
  6. J. Jump

    J. Jump New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,108
    Likes Received:
    0


    I think we must be careful that we don't pull a verse from somewhere and say that it automatically applies to everyone that is a believer. When we do that we can prove just about anything we want to.

    Verses must be taken in context which is immediate, within the book and consistent from the beginning of God's revelation to man to the end of God's revelation to man.

    And all believers inheriting the kingdom is not consistent from the beginning to the end.
     
  7. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    We have met the condition the moment we are in Christ. God's wrath is appeased in Christ...and His blessings for us are also in Christ. I believe the HCSB nails the meaning of verse 17...

    Rom 8:17 and if children, also heirs--heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ--seeing that we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him.
     
  8. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    The wealthy ruler was able to "see" Lazarus and Abraham in Heaven. Is the Kingdom not Heaven? Was the wealthy ruler (who was tormented) in the Kingdom?

    For those who are KOG / KOH, what do you believe "outer darkness" to be?
     
    #148 webdog, Sep 18, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 18, 2006
  9. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2

    So you believe all believers are not "sons"?
     
  10. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    This is simply wrong and the scripture proves it. Why would the Bible warn us not to be a fornicator or profane, then give us the example of Esau, if there was no real threat? Is the threat of chastening in the same passage a real threat? They both are!

    Hebrews 12:4-17
    4 Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin. 5 And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: 6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. 7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. 9 Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? 10 For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. 11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby. 12 Wherefore lift up the hands which hang down, and the feeble knees; 13 And make straight paths for your feet, lest that which is lame be turned out of the way; but let it rather be healed. 14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord: 15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; 16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. 17 For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.
     
  11. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    Do you believe Esau was a son?
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Real threat of what...sinning?
    Yes, it's real. I speak from experience (unfortunately). I have yet seen what this has to do with your Kingdom view.
     
  13. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Do you believe Esau was grafted to Jacob?
     
  14. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree but like Esau (and Reuben) we can lose the double portion.
     
  15. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    It is all of "my" Kingdom view.
     
  16. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    ...not if we are "in Christ" we can't. The Bible teaches that ALL believers are in Christ. It makes no difference if it's double or triple portions, if anything can be lost while "in Christ", eternal security is moot.
     
  17. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Esau was a natural branch.
     
  18. Linda64

    Linda64 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMO--this "Kingdom Exclusion" doctrine sounds more like a "Protestant Purgatory"
     
  19. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did you read the scripture I posted? Who was it addressed to? What was the promise? What was the warning?

    Esau was the firstborn son (Of Issac) by birth and heir, by birth, of the promises of Abraham. His behavior (as a son) caused him to lose not his sonship, but his double portion.

    We are not in Abraham. But the type holds. We are heirs of the promise (in Christ) by birth. But if we despise the birthright, the scripture plainly reveals that we will lose the birthright with its authority. We'll still (Always) be a son, but we stand to lose plenty.

    Lacy
     
  20. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    Then explain the warning in Hebrews 6. I'll be waiting.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...