KJV vs. NKJV: which do you prefer?

[Logos1560]

I repeat, if the N.K.J.V. is not acceptable, let us have a new version based on the traditional texts, produced by a Christian organization. I can think of no one better to do it that the Trinitarian Bible Society.

The Trinitarian Bible Society would not produce a new version based on the traditional texts because they have accepted aspects of erroneous KJV-only reasoning. If they would produce one, it would be attacked by the same inconsistent, unjust measures/standards that the Trinitarian Bible Society itself uses in its accusations against the NKJV.

 

[Martin Marprelate]

The Trinitarian Bible Society would not produce a new version based on the traditional texts because they have accepted aspects of erroneous KJV-only reasoning. If they would produce one, it would be attacked by the same inconsistent, unjust measures/standards that the Trinitarian Bible Society itself uses in its accusations against the NKJV.

I realise that. I was trying to point out the illogical nature of its position that it will put huge efforts into producing an up-to-date version of the Reina Valera (now available, I believe), but obstinately oppose the same thing being done for the dear old KJV.

 

[Salty]

This thread is closed
As usual, feel free to start a new thread.