SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Right back at you.
I gave a link on what the Americans said and you can't accept it so you typically criticise it
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Right back at you.
I think that we are in agreement on this, for if the need arises to have a cop use their gun will be aiming somewhere to try to put the other party down and unable to still keep coming!It means they shoot center mass until the threat is gone, unless the suspect is wearing body armor, then it’s a headshot.
There is a legal difference between saying the officer “shoots to kill” or “shoots to stop the threat”.
The first presumes the justification for lethal force remains until the suspect is dead.
The second allows for the possibility that the justification for lethal force may end under certain circumstances.
Perfect example is a case from a few years ago, in Chicago I think. Young man charges a cop with a knife. It is justified lethal force.
The cop fires 3 rounds (I think) and the suspect falls to the ground. The cop then fires 12 more shots while the suspect is on the ground.
Cop charged with murder because he continued to shoot after the threat was ended. The man posed no threat to stab anyone from the ground.
peace to you
nearly all of the "cop killing" cases have already been tried and verdict rendered by the media and the dems!And the majority of Americans don't think for themselves if that is TRULY the case.
nearly all of the "cop killing" cases have already been tried and verdict rendered by the media and the dems!
Yes, started all the way back we our Supreme Court kicked God out of the Public schools, and then Ok Infanticide!Then your country is on a fast slope to destruction
Yes, started all the way back we our Supreme Court kicked God out of the Public schools, and then Ok Infanticide!
Yes, started all the way back we our Supreme Court kicked God out of the Public schools, and then Ok Infanticide!
Yes, but many times the Supreme Court nominees who seemed to be conservative once confirmed they all of a sudden become liberal, see John Roberts!Abortion became legal in 1973 in the US. Richard Nixon was the president and he was GOP!
True, but they did excuse him out of the school system!No human being can EVER kick God out of anywhere! He does as He pleases when He pleases and to whom He pleases. And is answerable to no one
Yes, but many times the Supreme Court nominees who seemed to be conservative once confirmed they all of a sudden become liberal, see John Roberts!
True, but they did excuse him out of the school system!
1960'sLate 50s or early 60s?
Think more like they act and sound conservative to get passed, and then true self comes out, as SC lifetime appointment!Yes what happens to these people? Is it peer pressure
Think more like they act and sound conservative to get passed, and then true self comes out, as SC lifetime appointment!
She is a staunch Catholic, so would be anti abortion!So Trump's latest Justice the woman probably won't bother to change roe v wade
She is a staunch Catholic, so would be anti abortion!
Polls can be made to say anything.I gave a link on what the Americans said and you can't accept it so you typically criticise it
Polls can be made to say anything.
Wait, what? Just what do you imagine the sitting president has to do with Supreme Court decisions?Abortion became legal in 1973 in the US. Richard Nixon was the president and he was GOP!
Except he didn't kill Floyd as the evidence clearly showed.maybe. But why are you afraid that the majority in your country might think that Chauvin is guilty? There are police all around the world, who are corrupt and themselves lawbreakers. This does not mean that the majority are, but, they do exist. Chauvin is one of those who went too far.