Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree. One doesn't have to be burned to suffer loss...I watch Let's Make A Deal, and people suffer losses all the time when they could have taken the banker's offer in the mid 6 figures and instead greedily hold out for more and end up with $500. Ask them what it means to "suffer loss"1Cr 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
What is it that the believer loses? His salvation? NO! He loses rewards that he would have received had he been serving the Lord as he should have been. But he will be saved.
Maccabees is not scripture, so there is no need to go there.
he meant "Bama"...as in Roll TIDE!!!!
In XC
-
Why Bema? Doesn't that all occure at the great white throne judgement?
I'm not a resident Catholic apologist but I will give you something else, although you will reject it just like you rejected the other two passages I submitted. It has been my observation that no matter what a person's beliefs may be, he will accept scripture at face value if he agrees with it. If he doesn't agree with it, he will offer another explanation of the passage that conforms to his beliefs. So here goes:I'm still waiting for our resident Catholic apologists to explain purgatory and offer scripture as proof.
These words of Christ imply there may be forgiveness in the age to come. Since there is no sin in Heaven, it doesn't apply to people who go there. We all believe there is no getting out of Hell once you go there, so it can't apply to Hell either. That only leaves one other possibility--Purgatory.Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come. Matthew 12:32.
I'm not a resident Catholic apologist but I will give you something else, although you will reject it just like you rejected the other two passages I submitted. It has been my observation that no matter what a person's beliefs may be, he will accept scripture at face value if he agrees with it. If he doesn't agree with it, he will offer another explanation of the passage that conforms to his beliefs. So here goes: These words of Christ imply there may be forgiveness in the age to come. Since there is no sin in Heaven, it doesn't apply to people who go there. We all believe there is no getting out of Hell once you go there, so it can't apply to Hell either. That only leaves one other possibility--Purgatory.
These words of Christ imply there may be forgiveness in the age to come. Since there is no sin in Heaven, it doesn't apply to people who go there. We all believe there is no getting out of Hell once you go there, so it can't apply to Hell either. That only leaves one other possibility--Purgatory.
Zenas said:These words of Christ imply there may be forgiveness in the age to come.
Call me stupid, call me crazy, call me ugly, but please don't call me a liberal. :BangHead:Only to a liberal does "shall not be forgiven" mean "may be forgiven".
Call me stupid, call me crazy, call me ugly, but please don't call me a liberal. :BangHead:
Thanks(?) RB. Incidentally I preferred the Georgia flag, at least I think that's what it was.Your stupid, crazy, and ugly. lol
Thanks(?) RB. Incidentally I preferred the Georgia flag, at least I think that's what it was.
Go to the passage and read it all--in context.Call me stupid, call me crazy, call me ugly, but please don't call me a liberal. :BangHead:
Now, let's look at this verse. Jesus was making it clear that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is an unforgivable sin. However he could have simply said, "Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him." He could have stopped right there. That is all that was necessary to get the point across but He went further by appending the words "either in this age or in the age to come."
One way of looking at this, probably the one favored by you, would be that Jesus was only being emphatic. Like me saying to my child, "No you can't have a pony, not now, not next year, not ever." However, by saying this, I am recognizing that I could give her something next year, just not a pony.
The other way of looking at this is that Jesus wouldn't have ruled out forgiveness for blasphemy in the age to come unless there actually could be forgiveness for other sins in the age to come.
I'm still waiting for our resident Catholic apologists to explain purgatory and offer scripture as proof.
I still have the propensity not in the same manner as before and my life has improved. But here is the thing. Isn't Christ finished work sufficient enough for me to be free from sin entirely? Why do I and others still struggle with sin?
Why Bema? Doesn't that all occure at the great white throne judgement?
I want to chime in and say ANYONE who hopes in a second chance after death will be eternally disappointed. It's Heaven or Hell and if you need a testimony I suggest you read the story "deaths" of the rich man and Lazurus. Don't play Russian roulette with your soul........no Purgatory ...no third option.