There seems to be a heavy focus on the word draw from the anti-calvinist crowd here. Calvinists know that the Greek underlying the word draw in passages in question (such as John 6) has a literal meaning of drag.
Non-Calvinists cry foul and say experts chose the word draw and not drag so we must be wrong. They say we "re-define" words. But do we really?
Let's look at the first two definitions of the word:
What do you know? Force applied, move to one side, pull out of a receptical, cause to come out, cause to go in a certain direction. These aren't invitations. These are intentional movements.
Let's now look at a thesaurus:
What do you know, it is a synonym of the word drag.
Do people still want to argue that the word draw is merely an invitation?