pinoybaptist said:Maybe I am misunderstanding you, brother.
are you saying the atonement is universal and unlimited ?
Then we should be universalists if that is the case.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
pinoybaptist said:Maybe I am misunderstanding you, brother.
are you saying the atonement is universal and unlimited ?
I started to reply to this last night, and again this afternoon, but I get a little grieved and nauseated every time I reflect of what you have said. So much for "Jesus Paid It All"!skypair said:NO! The facts are that I sinned and came short of the righteousness of God. And I MUST do something about that! God has done all that He can on my behalf at the cross. It's up to me now.
So I take it you have done absolutely nothing in response to Jesus sacrifice?TomMann said:I started to reply to this last night, and again this afternoon, but I get a little grieved and nauseated every time I reflect of what you have said. So much for "Jesus Paid It All"!
TC, I have always been intrigued by those who insist that "world" in the scriptures means every person without exception, when the examples are numerous where it does not.TCGreek said:Then we should be universalists if that is the case.
No. One is not stuck with universalism. You guys keep leaving out something very important, FAITH. There are some who will never believe and therefore will never see eternal life with God. That's why I keep saying that salvation has two parts, a Savior and faith in the Savior. That is why the people who "deny the Lord who bought them" will forever be lost. They denied Christ. They did not put their faith in Him and His finished work. But Christ still did the work of atonement for all men. Not all men will believe, only some.Tom Butler said:TC, I have always been intrigued by those who insist that "world" in the scriptures means every person without exception, when the examples are numerous where it does not.
At any rate, I offer II Cor 5:19 for them to chew on: "To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself; not imputing their trespasses to
them...."
This passage places them on the horns of a dilemma. If Christ is not imputing trespasses to the world, one must choose between universalism or something less than universalism. In other words, limting the world to whom he is not imputing trespasses.
One may turn it around and interpret this passage to mean that God imputes the righteousness of Christ to believers, and forgives the trespasses of those who repent and believe--every repenter in the whole world.
Otherwise, one is stuck with universalism.
Tom Butler said:TC, I have always been intrigued by those who insist that "world" in the scriptures means every person without exception, when the examples are numerous where it does not.
At any rate, I offer II Cor 5:19 for them to chew on: "To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself; not imputing their trespasses to
them...."
This passage places them on the horns of a dilemma. If Christ is not imputing trespasses to the world, one must choose between universalism or something less than universalism. In other words, limting the world to whom he is not imputing trespasses.
One may turn it around and interpret this passage to mean that God imputes the righteousness of Christ to believers, and forgives the trespasses of those who repent and believe--every repenter in the whole world.
Otherwise, one is stuck with universalism.
Tom Butler said:TC, I have always been intrigued by those who insist that "world" in the scriptures means every person without exception, when the examples are numerous where it does not.
At any rate, I offer II Cor 5:19 for them to chew on: "To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself; not imputing their trespasses to
them...."
This passage places them on the horns of a dilemma. If Christ is not imputing trespasses to the world, one must choose between universalism or something less than universalism. In other words, limting the world to whom he is not imputing trespasses.
One may turn it around and interpret this passage to mean that God imputes the righteousness of Christ to believers, and forgives the trespasses of those who repent and believe--every repenter in the whole world.
Otherwise, one is stuck with universalism.
Amy.G said:No. One is not stuck with universalism. You guys keep leaving out something very important, FAITH. There are some who will never believe and therefore will never see eternal life with God. That's why I keep saying that salvation has two parts, a Savior and faith in the Savior. That is why the people who "deny the Lord who bought them" will forever be lost. They denied Christ. They did not put their faith in Him and His finished work. But Christ still did the work of atonement for all men. Not all men will believe, only some.
Christ's work + our faith = salvation.
Poor usage of scripture Tom which seems to bring you to a false conclusion since your beginning with a faulty premise.Tom Butler said:TC, I have always been intrigued by those who insist that "world" in the scriptures means every person without exception, when the examples are numerous where it does not.
At any rate, I offer II Cor 5:19 for them to chew on: "To wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself; not imputing their trespasses to
them...."
This passage places them on the horns of a dilemma. If Christ is not imputing trespasses to the world, one must choose between universalism or something less than universalism. In other words, limting the world to whom he is not imputing trespasses.
One may turn it around and interpret this passage to mean that God imputes the righteousness of Christ to believers, and forgives the trespasses of those who repent and believe--every repenter in the whole world.
Otherwise, one is stuck with universalism.
Question: What must be done in order for God to be reconciled to a person or people? Is it not the atonement??Such is also the import of the term World, which he formerly used; for though nothing will be found in the world that is worthy of the favor of God, yet he shows himself to be reconciled to the whole world, when he invites all men without exception to the faith of Christ, which is nothing else than an entrance into life.
This goes back to what I posted earlier in this thread which discusses Christ's propitiation in relation to 1 John 2:2 (not ours only ..) and it relates here as well.Reconciliation
A CHANGE FROM ENMITY TO FRIENDSHIP. IT IS MUTUAL, I.E., IT IS A CHANGE WROUGHT IN BOTH PARTIES WHO HAVE BEEN AT ENMITY.
(1.) In Col. 1:21, 22, the word there used refers to a change wrought in the personal character of the sinner who ceases to be an enemy to God by wicked works, and yields up to him his full confidence and love. In 2 Cor. 5:20 the apostle beseeches the Corinthians to be “reconciled to God”, i.e., to lay aside their enmity.
(2.) Rom. 5:10 refers not to any change in our disposition toward God, but to God himself, as the party reconciled. Romans (Rom. 5:11) teaches the same truth. From God we have received “the reconciliation” (R.V.), i.e., he has conferred on us the token of his friendship. So also 2 Cor. 5:18, 19 speaks of a reconciliation originating with God, and consisting in the removal of his merited wrath. In Eph. 2:16 it is clear that the apostle does not refer to the winning back of the sinner in love and loyalty to God, but to the restoration of God’s forfeited favour. This is effected by his justice being satisfied, so that he can, in consistency with his own nature, be favourable toward sinners. Justice demands the punishment of sinners. The death of Christ satisfies justice, and so reconciles God to us. This reconciliation makes God our friend, and enables him to pardon and save us. (See ATONEMENT.)
First, it isn't universalism just your misunderstanding of the text in question as I see it.Jarthur001 said:Your post does not address the word "world" which was the main point. If world means all of mankind, then II Cor 5:19 means all of mankind will be reconciled.
Also if man must sin to be a sinner as some on this board has claimed, II Cor 5:19 says God will not impute trespasses of the world of mankind when they do sin, therefore all of mankind is not sinners no matter what they do.
If the world of mankind is not born sinners and sins are not imputed to the whole world of mankind, then none of us are sinners, and no one goes to hell, and Faith is not needed.
This my dear sister is universalism.
This is a powerful verse one must deal with.
Allan said:First, it isn't universalism just your misunderstanding of the text in question as I see it.
Also.. I can't find any lexical aide that states your version of the term 'world' means at any time, anywhere - God's people.
Every time it is used in relation of men to God it is always in every instance - wicked and sinful mankind as seperate from God's people. Its definition was established in the OT and continued in the NT with no deviation. Sorry, it just ain't there.
2 Corinthians 5:19 (Young's Literal Translation)
19how that God was in Christ -- a world reconciling to Himself, not reckoning to them their trespasses; and having put in us the word of the reconciliation
2 Corinthians 5:19 (Darby Translation)
19how that God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not reckoning to them their offences; and putting in us the word of that reconciliation.
.2 Corinthians 5:19 (21st Century King James Version)
19to wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them, and hath committed unto us the Word of reconciliation
.2 Corinthians 5:19 (Amplified Bible)
19It was God [personally present] in Christ, reconciling and restoring the world to favor with Himself, not counting up and holding against [men] their trespasses [but cancelling them], and committing to us the message of reconciliation (of the restoration to favor)
2 Corinthians 5:19 (New International Version)
19that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation.
2 Corinthians 5:19 (The Message)
God put the world square with himself through the Messiah, giving the world a fresh start by offering forgiveness of sins. God has given us the task of telling everyone what he is doing. We're Christ's representatives. God uses us to persuade men and women to drop their differences and enter into God's work of making things right between them. We're speaking for Christ himself now: Become friends with God; he's already a friend with you.
2 Corinthians 5:19 (English Standard Version)
19that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation.
Post #90 clarifies this and how it does mean all men (every sinful and wicked person).Jarthur001 said:Hello Allan,
It can be very easy. Does the word world mean all of mankind?
I feel the "world" is limited here and does not apply to each person that has ever been born.
other Bibles...
.
.
Is this saying all of mankind (the world) is reconciled in Christ?
Or is this limited to a group? That group being the believers/the elect of God.
James,Is this saying all of mankind (the world) is reconciled in Christ?
Or is this limited to a group? That group being the believers/the elect of God.
Amy,Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Hello Outsider. You are such a nice person to talk with. Yes, I agree that Paul was referring to himself and other saved individuals, but I was trying to make a point that Christ died for sinners, and all are sinners, even the "elect".Outsider said:Amy,
I do feel that Paul was talking about a select group here. I believe he was referring to himself and those that have been saved only.
The reason why I believe this scripture is for them only, is because in verse 9.
Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
I see the "We" in verse 9, being the same as the "Us" in verse 8.
To remain consistant, if the "Us in v 8, is the "We" in v 9, then scripture would be telling us that "All" are justified. Paul was letting them know that they are now justified and will be saved from God's wrath (to come).
Just the way I see it anyway.
God bless and many blessings!!!
Thank you for the compliment. I feel the same towards you.Hello Outsider. You are such a nice person to talk with. Yes, I agree that Paul was referring to himself and other saved individuals, but I was trying to make a point that Christ died for sinners, and all are sinners, even the "elect".
Maybe I didn't do a good job of point-making.
skypair said:So I take it you have done absolutely nothing in response to Jesus sacrifice?
There is no scriptural mandate, in your view, to believe the gospel in order to be saved?
Is there, Tom, ANY scriptural mandate you must obey for salvation? Any that you can think of? Or have you so compartmentalized "election" from your persona that your salvation is simply a matter of fate?
skypair
Are you saying that faith is a result of salvation?TomMann said:Water boils when it is heated. It doesn't decide to boil, it doesn't cooperate in the process. It is acted upon and as a result takes on a new nature, steam.
Are there changes in an individual to whom Christ is revealed? Absolutely there are. But they are a result of salvation and not the cause.
Are there scriptural mandates to be obeyed? No! Are there scriptural evidences that will be seen? Yes.
If your definition of fate is predetermined or predestinated outcome? I don't argue against your saying I believe in fate.