• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Love Alone Saves (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You sound like a Calvinist with these words. If only you didn't add to this...

Menno, We tell you God can do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING and the HOW and WAY he wants it.

We don't read any scripture with God punishing Adam and Eve with loss of free will or with the capacity to never do good.


We say God can do ANYTHING AND ANYWAY he wants he can EVEN run the world in a Calvinist system.

You say GOD can do anything AND ANYWAY but he is STUCK doing it only in a Calvinist system.

Your idea of GOD has no sovereignty, He can't make folks with free will, He can't even teach anyone to do anything right, let alone tie their shoes .
 

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm afraid you are losing it Utilyan. You have weaved such a web of twists and turns of word meanings just to reject what Jesus Christ has said and go about to make up your own religion.

Can you understand this.....

"I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins." (John 8:24)

Can you grasp this? If ye believe not that Jesus is the Christ, ye shall die in your sins!!!!! Why is this so difficult for you to believe Jesus???

Nope.

John 14

11“Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me; otherwise believe because of the works themselves.


I got video here which might better explain "BELIEVING" then I can.

And here is the Catechism of the Catholic Church explaining the position:

=========
"Outside the Church there is no salvation"

846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:



Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.336
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:



Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338
========



This video will explain "BELIEVING"


 
Last edited:

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Even Hitler could be said to have loved his neighbour, for just like the Jews and yourself, you get to decide when you want to show that love and to whom, for your love of thy neighbour is tainted with your sin nature which can only be fixed through faith in Jesus Christ which you reject the need for that part.

Hitler showed his true self and it was anything but love for his fellow man a' la' Christ. I have my faith in Jesus Christ as the Savior, He is my advocate before the Father, but I just don't believe that others who do not make the same claim as I and you do are separated from Him. In an unknowing way I think that they embrace Him also and that is what is most important.

Look, I respect your opinion on this as it is a cut and dried issue for you. As for me I look at it differently and my opinion is just as valid as yours. Let's say some of these other folks do indeed see the kingdom, does that in any way lesson your walk with Christ as you have experienced it in this life? I would think not.
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well Herbert,

I think it should be pretty clear to you from reading Adonia and Utilyan's post that they believe a person can reject Jesus Christ and be saved.

So my question for you is, why would a Catholic believe such a thing since the RCC does not teach such a thing? Are there bishops in your religion that are going rogue and teaching their people things that are against the RCC teachings? And if so, why wouldn't the Pope reprimand them or even remove them from their position?
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And here is the Catechism of the Catholic Church explaining the position:
Totally different subject.

You posted the Catechism which speaks about those who never heard through no fault of there own. This debate is about those who heard the Gospel and rejected Jesus Christ. Totally different.
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In an unknowing way I think that they embrace Him also and that is what is most important.
How can they do so in an "unknowing way'? This debate is about those who "do know" about Jesus Christ and they reject Him. One cannot say they love their neighbour and at the same time they reject Jesus Christ who created the command. Wouldn't that be absurd?
 

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Totally different subject.

You posted the Catechism which speaks about those who never heard through no fault of there own. This debate is about those who heard the Gospel and rejected Jesus Christ. Totally different.


"Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338

Sorry brother show me Muslim or an Athiest who is NOT IGNORANT OF THE GOSPEL.

Its almost a "oxymoron". In heaven there is going to be so much forgiving, folks are going to be gnashing their teeth in anger.

Also "NO FAULT of their OWN" that is a pretty massive butter fly effect umbrella.
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338

Sorry brother show me Muslim or an Athiest who is NOT IGNORANT OF THE GOSPEL.

Its almost a "oxymoron". In heaven there is going to be so much forgiving, folks are going to be gnashing their teeth in anger.

Also "NO FAULT of their OWN" that is a pretty massive butter fly effect umbrella.
Exactly! You posted about those "ignorant of the gospel". We are not debating that here. We are debating those who are NOT ignorant of the gospel. They hear the Gospel and they REJECT the gospel. Where have you been????
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him
Also I believe you missed the part "to that faith without which it is impossible to please him"

It's about God leading that person to faith outside of the Catholic Church. You keep saying a person does not need faith. Do I have to explain for you your own Catechism? It states it right there, without faith it is IMPOSSIBLE to please God. God must lead the person to faith, either through the Church or by Himself. Either way faith is a must.
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Menno, We tell you God can do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING and the HOW and WAY he wants it.

We don't read any scripture with God punishing Adam and Eve with loss of free will or with the capacity to never do good.


We say God can do ANYTHING AND ANYWAY he wants he can EVEN run the world in a Calvinist system.

You say GOD can do anything AND ANYWAY but he is STUCK doing it only in a Calvinist system.

Your idea of GOD has no sovereignty, He can't make folks with free will, He can't even teach anyone to do anything right, let alone tie their shoes .
Indeed, we cannot find free will anywhere in the Bible.

Nowhere do I claim God can't. What I claim is what God declared in scripture.
God says he chooses. God says he predestines. God says he adopts.
Does God say he created free will? If so, share the scripture where that is recorded.
 
Last edited:

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Indeed, we cannot find free will anywhere in the Bible.

Nowhere do I claim God can't. What I claim is what God declared in scripture.
God says he chooses. God says he predestines. God says he adopts.
Does God say he created free will? If so, share the scripture where that is recorded.

"we cannot find free will anywhere in the Bible."

Show me in the bible where it says God gave you a BRAIN.


I guess you don't have a brain?
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"we cannot find free will anywhere in the Bible."

Show me in the bible where it says God gave you a BRAIN.


I guess you don't have a brain?
What's your point?

Do you imagine God has lied when he says he chooses, predestines and adopts? Is the problem merely because your mind cannot comprehend how God can have such control over his own creation?
 

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Also I believe you missed the part "to that faith without which it is impossible to please him"

It's about God leading that person to faith outside of the Catholic Church. You keep saying a person does not need faith. Do I have to explain for you your own Catechism? It states it right there, without faith it is IMPOSSIBLE to please God. God must lead the person to faith, either through the Church or by Himself. Either way faith is a must.

It states a particular faith, THAT faith, The Catholic Faith.


"You keep saying a person does not need faith."

Quote me. The only thing I've said is faith ->ALONE<- is not the only means of salvation.


You know these debates would be a lot easier if you actual read the catechism and then actually point out a flaw inside of it.
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1) herbert, is Christ God or is he just a man who worked hard enough to merit extra points from God?

2) If you have to work for God's favor, is God's response really a response of graciousness or is it a response of duty to the one who has worked hard?

3) Is grace unmerited favor given by God to whom He wills, regardless of the persons moral status?

4) Based upon your statement, what Bible passages do you have, which shows that Yeshua received grace points from God that God will pass out to others?
Bump.

@herbert
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1) How does God choose whom He will save?

2) What are the things God must decide before a person can be saved?

3) Can a person be pardoned by God of their sins if they attempt to come to God on their own merit or by a pathway other than the cross?

@Adonia, @utilyan, @AndyMartin, and all others, please answer these three question and show the scripture you use as text to legitimize your position.
Bump. Still waiting for these questions to be answered.

Crickets...
 

utilyan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What's your point?

Do you imagine God has lied when he says he chooses, predestines and adopts? Is the problem merely because your mind cannot comprehend how God can have such control over his own creation?

Not at all. Lets cut to the chase here. Every single soul in heaven is ELECT. Can you agree with this?
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not at all. Lets cut to the chase here. Every single soul in heaven is ELECT. Can you agree with this?
Every single soul...whether heaven or hell, utilyan. Predestination is not just a referring to heaven.

And...this is a display of God's love when he predestines all humanity. Wrap your mind around that...if you can.
 

herbert

Member
Site Supporter
By saying this you are saying you cannot know now that you are saved. There are two judgment days coming. One for the saved and one for the lost. You will either be at the one or the other. Judgment deciding who will be saved is in the Present for each person who hears the Gospel and makes their decision either for Jesus Christ or rejecting Jesus Christ.

i gave you this Scripture, the very words of Jesus Christ Himself, and you either disregard it or totally ignore it or do not believe Jesus...

"He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him." (John 3)

steaver,

I will get to your other comments as soon as possible. But I'd like to point something out here that I think lies at the heart of this problem. As I see it, you understand salvation according to a particular paradigm. Catholics have their own paradigm. It seems as though a Catholic view on salvation and judgment doesn't exactly line up nicely with the terms of your paradigm. That doesn't, however, mean that a Catholic view is incoherent, unBiblical, or wrong at all. What it means is that our respective paradigms must be considered in order for us to move ahead fruitfully. And this particular passage just so happens to be a passage which may shed a lot of light on our differences. Let's consider it.

"He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him."

Consider this: I could have "eternal life" and then lose my possession of that "eternal life" by means of apostasy. For the word "everlasting" or "eternal" here should be understood as a quality of the life I possess in Christ, and not as a description of the duration of time during which I am guaranteed to have it.

Believing upon the Son is what brings about one's possession of that "eternal life" which accompanies belief. However, were one to turn his back upon the Son, he would then lose that "eternal life" which he once possessed.

For nothing in that passage says "He that believes on the Son has eternal life eternally..." So it is that I may, for a time, have eternal life through belief in the Son yet at some later time lose that eternal life through apostasy.

I heard someone explain it this way: If I had an "eternal battery pack" which was an unlimited source of energy for my phone, I could say "Look, I possess eternal power." Then, if I lost that battery pack I would say "I lost my eternal battery power." The fact that I have something with a particular quality (eternality) doesn't mean I will have that something for eternity. So it is that one could believe in Christ and thereby possess eternal life. Through sin and selfishness, though, that person could stray from Christ and come to deny Him altogether. In such a case, that eternal life in which that person once had a share, is now lost to him. He has, therefore, lost the "everlasting life" which came about through "belief in the Son." In his case, then, he had "everlasting life" for a time... But lost it. Just as I may have "everlasting power" (in a battery) for a time... only to lose it.

What you see as verses which support your paradigm are, to a Catholic, understood to contradict the position you're presenting.

What do you think? (and again, I'll get to your other comments as soon as time allows).

In Him,

Herbert
 

steaver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Consider this: I could have "eternal life" and then lose my possession of that "eternal life" by means of apostasy. For the word "everlasting" or "eternal" here should be understood as a quality of the life I possess in Christ, and not as a description of the duration of time during which I am guaranteed to have it.

Herein lies the root cause of the error in your paradigm. To truly believe upon the Son of God is to receive Jesus Christ through the rebirth, born-again, born of God. "Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him." (1Jo5:1)

When this happens, two become one, a new creation is formed. "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." (2Cor 5:17) "For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature." (Gal 6:15)

Just as one cannot unborn their natural birth, one cannot unborn their spiritual birth. This is an act of God which no man can undo nor would anyone ever desire to undo. "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." (John 1)
"For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified." (Heb 10:14)


True faith is a born of God faith, a faith which crys ABBA Father. "For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father." (Ro 8:14)

Those who walk away are as John said, "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us". (1Jo2:19)

Believing upon the Son is what brings about one's possession of that "eternal life" which accompanies belief. However, were one to turn his back upon the Son, he would then lose that "eternal life" which he once possessed.

This is the sad reality of the RCC. Never knowing for sure if they will be saved. Next week you could get tired of doing the religious duties and walk away, you do not know. Maybe miss to many Masses, maybe not do enough good deeds. Maybe even stop believing in Jesus Christ. This can only happen if one has never been born again. Born of God is the difference between your position and mine. I cannot stop believing in that which I have a personal knowledge is an absolute truth. Do you have this personal knowledge Herbert? Do you know if Jesus Christ is in you?
 

MennoSota

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1) herbert, is Christ God or is he just a man who worked hard enough to merit extra points from God?

2) If you have to work for God's favor, is God's response really a response of graciousness or is it a response of duty to the one who has worked hard?

3) Is grace unmerited favor given by God to whom He wills, regardless of the persons moral status?

4) Based upon your statement, what Bible passages do you have, which shows that Yeshua received grace points from God that God will pass out to others?

@herbert still ignoring the questions.
This must mean he is stumped and unwilling to give up his false beliefs.
@Adonia, and @utilyan also with nothing. Clearly Rome has no grasp of grace, but teaches salvation by works...a heresy from the devil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top