• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Man's nature

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ok, but this doesn't addressed either my statement regarding the PB belief concerning eternal life nor my question posed to you on the same subject:


Are there people who are saved that have never or will never believe?

ie. people who are JW's, Mormons, occulticts, Pagans, atheists, ect..through their death, never believing.
This is what all the other PB'ers on the board have stated through various debates about this very discussion.

Much of the answer to your question(s) is contained within my last post Allan. Much of the blame for His sheep not coming to 'the church' will fall onto 'the church' itself. How are they supposed to believe in Christ when His teachings have been been grossly misrepresented by 'the church'.

Yes, I believe there are those that are redeemed and born from above who may never enter into His kingdom of righteousness, joy, and peace, for whatever reasons. But, the foundation of God standeth sure, the Lord knoweth them that as His.

You haven't addressed the question I posed to you in post #63:

You wrote:

Originally Posted by Allan
.....WHat I find most intriguing is that there is 'seemingly' no repentance on teh road to Damascus either but we both know that therr had to have been

I asked:

Why do you find that intriguing? Do you think that Paul may have 'skated by' without adhering to the complete 'formula' one has to follow in order to acquire eternal life? Please explain.
 

Allan

Active Member
Yes, I believe there are those that are redeemed and born from above who may never enter into His kingdom of righteousness, joy, and peace, for whatever reasons. But, the foundation of God standeth sure, the Lord knoweth them that as His.
Here you have confused me more so than before.
Are you saying that there are some who have been redeemed/born from above, that will never have eternal life??

You haven't addressed the question I posed to you in post #63:
Yes I did, in post #116
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Here you have confused me more so than before.
Are you saying that there are some who have been redeemed/born from above, that will never have eternal life??

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1488277#post1488277

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1488545#post1488545


Yes I did, in post #116

No, you didn't. I asked:

Do you think that Paul may have 'skated by' without adhering to the complete 'formula' one has to follow in order to acquire eternal life?
...and you haven't addressed that.
 

zrs6v4

Member
From all the PB's I have debated with and those on this board that I have specifically spoken with (as well as the materials I have read from them), believe the elect is composed up of those of faith as well as others that will never have/place faith in Christ. These 'others' consist of unbelievers, believers in other gods, atheists or haters of God, but after they die they will find out they are God's elect ones and are already saved.

They all state the same thing you seemingly did back in post #63.. there is no 'formula' in order for man to obtain eternal life.

I believe Billy Graham has a similar view unless I am mistaken.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ann, you are always nice and I like you. You are the nicest Calvinist on the BB, imo. :wavey:

Awww - thanks Marcia. :)

I've heard this example of Lazarus before, but the story of Lazarus was not about salvation but about the power Jesus had to raise the dead. It should not be used as an allegory of salvation. That is just not good hermeneutics.

Yeah, I know. I almost didn't use it but still went for it. It's just an analogy although it's not perfect. But I do see similarities to the way Jesus rose people from the dead (that sounds SO grammatically bad) and how we are raised to spiritual life too.

I don't see scriptural support, however, for the "quickening." It's just not there. The way God saves is hidden from us, as far as I'm concerned. He tells us we are elect and chosen and He tells us to believe. Salvation is a mystery that we cannot dissect.

Being spiritually dead means being separated from God, and unreconciled to Him, not unable to respond.

See, I absolutely see the idea of being "quickened" in the Bible. It's not the "making born again without their knowledge" that some hyper-Calvinists might believe nor is it the "God doesn't do anything at all it's all man" of the, shall I put it as hyper-Arminian (I'm sure I'm using wrong terms in this since I'm not overly educated on terms and such). But since man cannot respond to God in our spiritually dead state, we MUST somehow be made able to respond. If one doesn't believe we're spiritually dead, then there's nothing more for me to say but if one agrees that we're spiritually dead, then there must be another step in there. The Bible speaks of the Father drawing, calling, seeking, etc. Those are the terms that I think show that we are somehow, by God's grace, made able to respond to Him. I do also see Scripturally that man's will is involved too so it's not like we're saved without our knowledge. It meets somewhere in the middle and from my reading of Scripture, the "quickening" makes the most Biblical sense.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Awww - thanks Marcia. :)
See, I absolutely see the idea of being "quickened" in the Bible. It's not the "making born again without their knowledge" that some hyper-Calvinists might believe nor is it the "God doesn't do anything at all it's all man" of the, shall I put it as hyper-Arminian (I'm sure I'm using wrong terms in this since I'm not overly educated on terms and such). But since man cannot respond to God in our spiritually dead state, we MUST somehow be made able to respond. If one doesn't believe we're spiritually dead, then there's nothing more for me to say but if one agrees that we're spiritually dead, then there must be another step in there. The Bible speaks of the Father drawing, calling, seeking, etc. Those are the terms that I think show that we are somehow, by God's grace, made able to respond to Him. I do also see Scripturally that man's will is involved too so it's not like we're saved without our knowledge. It meets somewhere in the middle and from my reading of Scripture, the "quickening" makes the most Biblical sense.
You are probably closer to our position than most of the Calvinists that I have talked to on this board. I am not a Calvinist, but I am not an Arminian either. I prefer to be labeled just as a non-Cal (or a Bible-believer, if you wish). The Arminian tag is an insult by the Calvinists because they know that we all believe in eternal security whereas the Arminians don't.

Anyway, Marcia is correct when she defined "dead" as
Being spiritually dead means being separated from God, and unreconciled to Him, not unable to respond.
That is the correct definition of death. It always means separation in the Bible. If the Calvinist could only understand this concept they would see that their arguments would fall apart. Separation from God does not mean without life, as they define it. It means that there must be a reconciliation. It means that there must be repentance. There is separation, and that separation must be reconciled. What does Paul say:

2 Corinthians 5:19-21 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.
21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

Being an ambassador for Christ we have the obligation of bearing the name of Christ to all that are in the world, taking the gospel to them and giving them "the word of reconciliation" (the gospel).
We plead with people to be reconciled with God. That is our message to them. Why? They are dead, or separated from God--not lifeless.
The answer to this problem is found in Christ. It was Christ that was sinless, Christ that was made sin for us; took our sin upon himself; that we might be made righteous through him.
Death is separation, not lifelessness.

The part the Holy Spirit is indeed a quickening, which also can be defined as a convicting. He came to the world to convict of sin, of righteousness, and of judgement. "Of sin because they believe not on me," the Bible says. Thus the work of the Holy Spirit brings conviction through the Word of God in order that the sinner may believe. But the "belief" or faith does not come from God. It must be the sinner's choice whether to accept Christ or to reject him. That is the way it was on the Day of Pentecost. Some were saved and some were not. Many were convicted. But in spite of that conviction, not all that were convicted trusted Christ. Thus the grace of God in some was resisted--even as Stephen said it was.

Man does respond when he is spiritually separated (dead) from God. He has no other choice. We are made ambassadors for Christ to reconcile the spiritually dead (separated) to Christ. That is our mission on this earth.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
What about the equally many, if not more stating to seek God, comes to God, etc?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
What about the MANY verses that say that man does not desire God, does not seek God, does not come to God, etc.??

Here's a young man who put together an extensive and exhaustive list, IMO. Take a look at it and tell me that the idea of total depravity is not Biblical.

http://www.traviscarden.com/articles/total-depravity-verse-list

I looked at those verses and did not see them teaching that man is so depraved that he could not choose God. I see them teaching that man has a sin nature and is prone to do evil.
Why, in Mark 10, did the rich young ruler seek out Christ, and then coming running to him, and bowing down in front of him, ask him: "How can I have eternal life?" He was seeking, wasn't he.
Nicodemus was seeking and he found salvation, as is evident from what we read in later chapters. "He came to Jesus by night."
Zaccheus sought out Jesus (and in a most difficult way).
The jailor came before Paul trembling and said "What must I do to be saved." Nobody forced him.
We have dozens of examples in the Bible of those who came of their own free will and trusted Christ. There are no examples that I know of where there is this process of new birth first and then justification or salvation second. Can you show me any examples of that happening?
 

Marcia

Active Member
No Marcia, it's people like you who are not only 'mean', but downright deceptive in your persistent insidious implications that all monergists are really just followers of Calvin.

One needs only to do a very brief scan of Winman's posts to realize his whole intent on this site is to bash the monergists and label them all as Calvinists, which really I take pride in the label, but for those newbies outside looking in, they could easily get the wrong impression towards us. Yeah, it is a shameful, deceitful tactic that you believers in 'Man's Sovereign Will' use quite often.

You, Marcia, should be ashamed.

What am I supposed to be ashamed of?

I strongly objective to the term "deceptive," which means one is purposely trying to deceive others. I think you owe me an apology on that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Allan

Active Member
No, you didn't. I asked:


...and you haven't addressed that.

Yes.. I.. did
Just because you don't 'like' the answer doesn't mean I haven't answered it.
Since there is a 'formula' to eternal life then, no, Paul did not "skate by" it. The passage regarding Paul salvation says nothing about what went on in Pauls heart at that moment. The only thing we know is that Paul ackowledged that whomever it was before him must be God, since he calls him 'Lord' and then obeyed him. Paul was zealot who love God thus this encounter redefines his view when Jesus answers the question - Lord, who are you?
Yet we do know what Paul believes regarding our eternal salvation as he has set it out to others - believe unto everlasting life as illistraged by this verse:
1Ti 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Allan

Active Member
Much of the answer to your question(s) is contained within my last post Allan. Much of the blame for His sheep not coming to 'the church' will fall onto 'the church' itself. How are they supposed to believe in Christ when His teachings have been been grossly misrepresented by 'the church'.

Yes, I believe there are those that are redeemed and born from above who may never enter into His kingdom of righteousness, joy, and peace, for whatever reasons. But, the foundation of God standeth sure, the Lord knoweth them that as His.
You seem to be deflecting and as such stillseemingly to still not answer my question.
It is a simple yes or no question:
Do you believe there are people who are eternally or everlastingly saved that have never or will never believe?

ie. people who are JW's, Mormons, occulticts, Pagans, atheists, ect..through their death, never believing - but are still eternally or everlasting saved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Archangel

Well-Known Member
Do you believe there are people who are eternally or everlastingly saved that have never or will never believe?

ie. people who are JW's, Mormons, occulticts, Pagans, atheists, ect..through their death, never believing - but are still eternally or everlasting saved.

I, for one, do not believe anyone is saved without believing. As a Calvinist, I would argue that belief is a result of God's work of redemption (Regeneration, etc.) not a cause of it. Regardless of which system of theology one holds, it is impossible to argue that persons are saved without actively believing in Christ.

Blessings,

The Archangel
 

Allan

Active Member
I, for one, do not believe anyone is saved without believing. As a Calvinist, I would argue that belief is a result of God's work of redemption (Regeneration, etc.) not a cause of it. Regardless of which system of theology one holds, it is impossible to argue that persons are saved without actively believing in Christ.

Blessings,

The Archangel
I completely concur :thumbs:
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I, for one, do not believe anyone is saved without believing. As a Calvinist, I would argue that belief is a result of God's work of redemption (Regeneration, etc.) not a cause of it. Regardless of which system of theology one holds, it is impossible to argue that persons are saved without actively believing in Christ.

Blessings,

The Archangel

I agree. It is clear that salvation is based on belief.
 

Winman

Active Member
No Marcia, it's people like you who are not only 'mean', but downright deceptive in your persistent insidious implications that all monergists are really just followers of Calvin.

One needs only to do a very brief scan of Winman's posts to realize his whole intent on this site is to bash the monergists and label them all as Calvinists, which really I take pride in the label, but for those newbies outside looking in, they could easily get the wrong impression towards us. Yeah, it is a shameful, deceitful tactic that you believers in 'Man's Sovereign Will' use quite often.

You, Marcia, should be ashamed.

It is not my intent to bash monergists and label them all as Calvinists. It is the doctrine I oppose, not individuals. As far as labeling all as Calvinists, I am aware that there are many different beliefs in this system (five point, four point, Doctrines of Grace...). One of the difficulties in this debate is that no two monergists seems to believe the same thing, and thus they constantly accuse those who oppose their doctrine of not understanding the doctrine or misrepresenting it.

As far as newbies looking in, I am just trying to show them that there is volumes of scripture that easily shows this doctrine error and making them aware of these scriptures.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You seem to be deflecting and as such stillseemingly to still not answer my question.
It is a simple yes or no question:
Do you believe there are people who are eternally or everlastingly saved that have never or will never believe?

ie. people who are JW's, Mormons, occulticts, Pagans, atheists, ect..through their death, never believing - but are still eternally or everlasting saved.

Your question is distorted and biased toward making it appear as if I would approve of God haters and evil doers being included among the elect.

I do not speak for other Primitive Baptists when I make this statement, I speak only for myself:

The Spirit of God blows where it wills. He is not confined to any Church or denomination, neither is His work constrained to the written word or conveyed by a preacher. Man has no more control over who is born of the Spirit than he does over the wind. Just as God had a multitude that belonged to Him outside of the Mosaic economy, I cannot doubt that He would have a multitude that belongs to Him outside of the visible church today.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is not my intent to bash monergists and label them all as Calvinists. It is the doctrine I oppose, not individuals. As far as labeling all as Calvinists, I am aware that there are many different beliefs in this system (five point, four point, Doctrines of Grace...). One of the difficulties in this debate is that no two monergists seems to believe the same thing, and thus they constantly accuse those who oppose their doctrine of not understanding the doctrine or misrepresenting it.

As far as newbies looking in, I am just trying to show them that there is volumes of scripture that easily shows this doctrine error and making them aware of these scriptures.

So, Winman, the God-honoring doctrines which give Him ALL the glory are false, and are damning folks, and it is your Christian duty to oppose and stamp out those doctrines every chance you get. Do I have it right?

But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who was made unto us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption: that, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord. I Cor 1:30,31
 
Top