My bad. Sorry man. Trying to understand your point
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Remember, the RCC contains some doctrines carried over from the "mystery, Babylon" religion started by Nimrod & Semiramis. In them, Mary replaced Semiramis as "queena hevvin". The Greex had picked up stuff from that religion as well, & made Athene a perpetual virgin. Thus, some early RCs made Mary into one, & the RCC has been trying to justify that doctrine even since, as well as the "Immaculate Deception", etc.Mark 6:3 “Is this not the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, Jose, Judas, and Simon? Are not his sisters here with us?”
All that you wrote cannot negate scripture. Mary had at least six children after Jesus.
Why are people so hung up on Mary having sex, and children, with her husband?
What purpose does it serve to ignore scripture and pretend she was a perpetual virgin?
peace to you
She had natural born children after Jesus, as no need to have her stay a perpetual Virgin, as Rome sees her as being sinless and somehow having sex would make her evil and not chaste!I was sitting at my desk thinking deep thoughts when a new one crept into my mind. Luke has Mary, who at the time was engaged to Joseph, being told by an angel that she will (future tense) conceive and give birth to a son. She replies by asking how that would be possible since she hasn't had any activity necessary to bring that about. I wonder why she would say that unless she also didn't plan on ever having that activity in the future after she was married? If, so, that might seem to be support for some religious organizations' assertion that she was forever virgin.
Mary was not the biological mother of Jesus, but the Surrogate Mother for the Son of God when He came in the form of Embryo like In-vitro
ya know ... I'd never thought about this ... but after having a couple of Embryo-Transfer cattle ... I better understand what you're saying ... and agree!
A Texas Longhorn momma can birth a full blood black angus calf in one of these procedures 9 months prior.
In my opinion, NOT because sex would have defile the fetus, Jesus, but so that no one could ever say that Jesus was conceived from sex
I’m 100% certain the Blessed Virgin Saint Mary, the Ark of the living God, the mother of God, birthed no other children and remained a Virgin; before, burning and after His birth. The perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin Saint Mary cannot exegetically be disproved
I never said so. 100% of His genes were from God or His own.
In order to clarify this point, I meant the concept of half brothers is based on the notion that Mary's ovum was used for Jesus, which I disagree.
Eliyahu
the Ark of the living God (Theotokos), the mother of God
No sir ... and embryo transfer is FULLY bovine ... it simply has the DNA of its parents, not the surrogate mother's.so Jesus Christ is not really "human", as the God-Man? Where did He get his "human nature" from?
Strictly speaking, that terminology is totally unBiblical.. . . Mother of God . . . .
Then you disagree with the word of God.. . . on the notion that Mary's ovum was used for Jesus, which I disagree.
Eliyahu
". . . And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? . . . "
it simply has the DNA of its parents
Not both Joseph and Mary!
I never said so. 100% of His genes were from God or His own.
In order to clarify this point, I meant the concept of half brothers is based on the notion that Mary's ovum was used for Jesus, which I disagree.
Eliyahu
You make a valid argument, however “Seed” means descendent. That is accomplished by Mary giving birth. In the same way Jesus was descended from David because Joseph was Mary’s husband and His “father” here. They obviously didn’t understand genetics in those days, as we do.Remember Jesus Christ, raised out of the dead, of the seed of David, according to my good news, 2 Tim 2:8 YLT
and to Abraham were the promises spoken, and to his seed; He doth not say, 'And to seeds,' as of many, but as of one, 'And to thy seed,' which is Christ; Gal 3:16 YLT
Reconcile to your thoughts.
You make a valid argument, however “Seed” means descendent. That is accomplished by Mary giving birth. In the same way Jesus was descended from David because Joseph was Mary’s husband and His “father” here. They obviously didn’t understand genetics in those days, as we do.
I’m more interested in the Angel saying the child is of Holy Spirit. That certainly opens the possibility the child (Jesus) was formed completely independent of Mary’s DNA.
I don’t believe any doctrine is affected by the view God formed Jesus’s human body independent of Mary’s DNA but we can disagree.
peace to you