• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Mitt Romney and the Platform his Presidential Nomination Gives Mormonism to Expand

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Then that means you must believe that the person who becomes President has more power to influence the lives of people than the Almighty.

Your God is much smaller than mine.

Doesn't mean that at all. Just the assumption you wanted to make in order to be able to make your little dig.:laugh:
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally Posted by Mexdeaf
Then that means you must believe that the person who becomes President has more power to influence the lives of people than the Almighty.

Doesn't mean that at all. Just the assumption you wanted to make in order to be able to make your little dig.:laugh:

Whereas you state that a Mormon president will result in many, many conversions to Mormonism. Doesn't mean that at all. Just the assumption you wanted to make in order to be able to make your little dig.:laugh:
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nope. We've never been left with two primary candidates who are clearly against God. This is new territory.

I guess you've never lived in the US for an election before this. LOL Yeah, this is SO not new territory.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
I guess you've never lived in the US for an election before this. LOL Yeah, this is SO not new territory.

Then do tell when the last time was that the two primary candidates for President were as they are today?
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
Then do tell when the last time was that the two primary candidates for President were as they are today?

You made the statement "Nope. We've never been left with two primary candidates who are clearly against God. This is new territory."

YOU provide the proof. Second request.
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
Doesn't mean that at all. Just the assumption you wanted to make in order to be able to make your little dig.:laugh:

No, it is a logical corollary of your "if you vote for Romney, millions will go to Hell" campaign.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
You made the statement "Nope. We've never been left with two primary candidates who are clearly against God. This is new territory."

YOU provide the proof. Second request.

You want the proof, go and get it. First request.

I'm not your child. I don't have to do something just because you and members of the board think that's SOP.:laugh:

I made the statement . If you don't want to believe it, i don't particularly care.
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
You want the proof, go and get it. First request.

I'm not your child. I don't have to do something just because you and members of the board think that's SOP.:laugh:

I made the statement . If you don't want to believe it, i don't particularly care.

Then your statements have ZERO credibility. And the attitude reflected here (as well as your previous post where you posted the picture of Big Bird giving the one-finger salute- then laughed it off) leaves you with very little personal credibility.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Then your statements have ZERO credibility. And the attitude reflected here (as well as your previous post where you posted the picture of Big Bird giving the one-finger salute- then laughed it off) leaves you with very little personal credibility.

You again are under the assumption that I give a flying hoot about having credibility with you. So save your little games. Crying "then your statements have zero credibility" isn't gonna force me to do anything.:laugh:

I guess some of you are just used to that stuff working.:wavey:
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then do tell when the last time was that the two primary candidates for President were as they are today?

Unregenerate? Hmmm - From what I've read, it could be all of history for the last bunch of years. I'm not so sure about the Bushes but honestly, I don't know that anyone running for president under either party have been regenerate in my lifetime.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Unregenerate? Hmmm - From what I've read, it could be all of history for the last bunch of years. I'm not so sure about the Bushes but honestly, I don't know that anyone running for president under either party have been regenerate in my lifetime.

I don't think there has ever been a time that we've had a KNOWN non-Christian as the primary candidate against a suspected non-Christian.

As immoral as the country has become, it appears to be a new low.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Zaac- You have made it clear that you are against Romney, your reason being is that he is a "false god worshipper". I asked you who you were for; and when you requested I open another thread on the subject, I did. In this new thread, you still would not give a straight answer.

So I ask you again, who are you in favor of becomming the next President? I ask for a name, that's all.
 

LadyEagle

<b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
Moderator note: This thread has reached 10 pages. Per forum rules, this thread will be closed no sooner than 8:00 p.m. ET by one of the moderators.

Lady Eagle
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Moderator note: This thread has reached 10 pages. Per forum rules, this thread will be closed no sooner than 8:00 p.m. ET by one of the moderators.

Lady Eagle

Well Zaac, time to start another Anti-Romney-Because-He's-A-Mormon thread.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Bottom line is that we get to choose between two men who are not believers. They are not close to being believers that we know of and so we have a decision to make:

* Vote for the man who will do the best job in the office
* Don't vote because there is no one worth voting for

It's your choice - and mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top