• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

My Position as a Baptist Believer

Status
Not open for further replies.

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Well done. That should end 1689Dave's ridiculous straw man argument and distracting assertion that Baptists adopted the Catholic's verbiage.



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
I actually thought that Matthew 28 stating the exact verbiage many baptist use (coupled with the fact that a baptist distinctive is the authority of Scripture) should have ended his ridiculous straw man argument.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
"People are more likely to be right in what they affirm than in what they deny." F.D. Maurice
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
Good catch. You are like my reviewers......I don't know whether to hug you or punch you....but you are good at catching this stuff. :D
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: "The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century."
Talk:Trinity/old1 - Wikipedia
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
@1689Dave,

Why do you hold the Ronan Catholic Church in such authority?

There is no evidence the RCC even existed in the second century. There is no ebidence Peter was the first Pope. These are things the RCC claims.

As Baptists most here will refute your allegiance to the Catholic authority. We (Baptists) look to Scripture - NOT Catholic councils, Creeds, or Encyclopedias as the standard of our faith and practice.

Scripture says to Baptize in "the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" and that the Disciples did indeed baptize in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

You are the only person here rejecting Scripture in favor of Catholic dogma. But this is because you do not understand the passages in question (you hold to ritualistic incantations).
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I actually thought that Matthew 28 stating the exact verbiage many baptist use (coupled with the fact that a baptist distinctive is the authority of Scripture) should have ended his ridiculous straw man argument.
Well, that should have done it.

But since 1689Dave kept clinging and quoting the Catholic Encyclopedia, actually reading it destroys his argument.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
It remains not finding something does not prove it doesn't exist. It could mean many different things. I'm going to do a search and get back with you.
The 1689 London Confession states Baptists MUST baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

If you cannot find that it does not mean it does not exist. :Wink
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
The 1689 London Confession states Baptists MUST baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

If you cannot find that it does not mean it does not exist. :Wink
Baptism as the Catholics do? It's baptism as the Apostles taught.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Baptism as the Catholics do? It's baptism as the Apostles taught.
Baptists do not baptize as the Catholics do. You are the only person accepting RCC as an authority.

Baptists affirm believers baptism and take their lead from Scripture (from the Bible).

Jesus told us how to disciple others and commanded that we make disciples baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

Have you ever read actually sat down and read the Bible or do you take your doctrine from another source (Ecumenical creeds, perhaps)?
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
Baptists do not baptize as the Catholics do. You are the only person accepting RCC as an authority.

Baptists affirm believers baptism and take their lead from Scripture (from the Bible).

Jesus told us how to disciple others and commanded that we make disciples baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

Have you ever read actually sat down and read the Bible or do you take your doctrine from another source (Ecumenical creeds, perhaps)?
You reject scripture about baptism and side with the Catholics. BTW, Antichrist still remains in the temple of God through his false doctrines.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
You reject scripture about baptism and side with the Catholics. BTW, Antichrist still remains in the temple of God through his false doctrines.
I actually accept Scripture about baptism.

I believe Jesus' words in Matthew 28 are true - we are to baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit AND I believe baptism presented in Acts, baptizing in the name of Christ is true (they are saying the same thing).

I think you are wrong to accept one passage and deny another.

You have been led astray in doctrine by websites like the one you offered. Have you bothered to read the site? Look at the writers statements about the TR. The guy obviously has no biblical background or any clue about what he is writing about.

That is why we have to stick with Scripture - not some fool on the internet blabbing about doctrines he has never formally studied. Scripture is the authority for our faith.
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
I actually accept Scripture about baptism.

I believe Jesus' words in Matthew 28 are true - we are to baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit AND I believe baptism presented in Acts, baptizing in the name of Christ is true (they are saying the same thing).

I think you are wrong to accept one passage and deny another.

You have been led astray in doctrine by websites like the one you offered. Have you bothered to read the site? Look at the writers statements about the TR. The guy obviously has no biblical background or any clue about what he is writing about.

That is why we have to stick with Scripture - not some fool on the internet blabbing about doctrines he has never formally studied. Scripture is the authority for our faith.
You reject the Apostle's final words on interpreting Matthew 28.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First of all Dave I disagree... If you Baptize in the name of Jesus only, you have robbed the Godhood... I baptize thee in the name of the Father... I know you believe God the Father gave all those elect to save to the Eternal Son... Right?... I baptize thee in the name of the Son... The Eternal Son had a name... Jesus... He had a name before Mary was told what his name was... Proverbs 30:4... His designation is Christ or the (Messiah), meaning “the anointed one"... Then last of all is the person of the Holy Ghost... the regenerator of the unregenerate... The quickener of the dead... The one who convicts us of sin against an offended Holy God... The three and one Godhead, elected us, gave us and saved us and without all three SALVATION IS IMPOSSIBLE!... Therefore I baptize thee... In the name of the FATHER... And of the SON... And of the HOLY GHOST!... TO GOD BE ALL THE GLORY!... Brother Glen:)

Btw... For clarification sake, in my Old Line Baptist Church I never heard Holy Spirit used in Baptism, only Holy Ghost!... Oh and speaking of the Holy Spirit, to those in the know... I GOT THE BOOK!:Biggrin

Did you mean to respond to my post or @1689Dave?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top