1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured NASB (1995 Edition) versus NASB (Current Edition)

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by alexander284, Mar 8, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh, Rip! You are so precious to me!!

    *You really are*
     
    #41 alexander284, Mar 15, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2022
  2. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You're hyper-effeminate. You are derailing your own thread. Seek professional help Alex.
     
  3. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Whatever you say, Rip!

    *Ahhhhhhh *
     
  4. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, I've come to understand why.
     
  5. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    All 3 of them essentially literal and formal translations, while the 2020 Nas seems to be moving into at times more dynamic version
     
  6. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, I'm rather disappointed by that.
     
  7. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I noticed you didn't mention the NKJV. Do you consider the NKJV to be reliable, also?
     
  8. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, I find it's growing on me, as well. I'm not prepared to make the transition from the 1995 edition to the 2020 edition, but the 2020 update is better than I expected it to be.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But you would prefer siblings. :)
     
  10. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,742
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Absolutely, but why didn't you mention that since there is no difference in Christ, male or female, highlighting "and sisters" presents falsehood.
     
  11. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Think that Lockman basically decided to make their version of the Csb, to be more inclusive in order to try to get more market share!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    To me its pretty much same as the 2011 was to the 1984 niv!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah, let's attribute evil motives to the CSB translation team. Why not, you have dumped on the NIV for ages. You might as well make false accusations about the translators of another translation. I'm waiting for you to go after the NLT team next.
     
  14. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I see what you're saying, but I believe that the 2020 edition of the NASB isn't as extreme.
     
  15. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    I NEVER said evil motives, but that they decided to change form being so formal and literal in order to try to gain more market share!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Agree with that, as think the Niv 2011 went full on inclusive, but still disappointing where they took the newest Nas!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, that aspect of the NASB 2020 is, indeed, a source of disappointment. However, still a solid, formal Bible translation, nevertheless, wouldn't you agree?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Would see it as about the same as the Csb, still a good translation, but did get downgraded!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The NIV in any of its editions was never formally equivalent, or "literal" as you wrongly stated.

    And your false accusation about market share is shameful.
     
  20. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    I was addressing the Lockman Foundation and their situation!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...